DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6187 - 6190
I vote: 6187 D1 3.0 coppro Instant Adoption AGAINST 6188 D0 2.0 ais523 Fix the revocation bug FOR -- -Tiger
DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6187 - 6190
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Due to lack of quorum, the decisions for Proposals 6187, 6188, and 6190 are not resolved; instead, the voting period is doubled. Any chance you can repost the text of such proposals next time?
DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are Murphy and Yally. Aren't you the IADoP?
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election
comex wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are Murphy and Yally. Aren't you the IADoP? No e is not; Murphy's attempt to cause the election to start and subsequently end failed due to my being an eligible candidate. There is currently an ongoing election.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election
coppro wrote: comex wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are Murphy and Yally. Aren't you the IADoP? No e is not; Murphy's attempt to cause the election to start and subsequently end failed due to my being an eligible candidate. There is currently an ongoing election. Not my attempt; I haven't been nor deputised for IADoP in some time.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting results for Proposals 6187 - 6190
comex wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Due to lack of quorum, the decisions for Proposals 6187, 6188, and 6190 are not resolved; instead, the voting period is doubled. Any chance you can repost the text of such proposals next time? I'll try to remember. Proposals haven't been failing quorum very often in recent months.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registrar Election
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: comex wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: I deputize for the IADoP to initiate an Agoran Decision to choose the holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector is the IADoP, and the options are Murphy and Yally. Aren't you the IADoP? No e is not; Murphy's attempt to cause the election to start and subsequently end failed due to my being an eligible candidate. There is currently an ongoing election. It was Wooble's attempt.
DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Refactor contracts
Ed Murphy wrote: Publicity is a contract switch with values Private (default) and Public. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding: I like this proposal, however, Publicity is already a forum switch.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: http://irc.freenode.net:6667/#%23nomic no longer a forum
On 4/10/09 10:08 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: ##nomic doesn't work for me either. Besides, Rule 478 says the publicity of a forum can be changed by the Registrar without objection by announcing intent to change it to that forum. But that forum is inaccessible so this is hardly possible. I assure that the forum actually exists and continues to be functional. As with most technical things, can we be a whole lot more specific than doesn't work, please? You might also consider irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/%23%23nomic if your IRC client actually takes URLs and is not forgiving with their format. - woggle signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
