On 31 July 2011 05:23, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
R2328.
Sigh.
On 31 July 2011 02:18, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2011 23:21, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deregister.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to withdraw all
previous support or
On 30 July 2011 23:43, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Consent Timing (AI=3)
{{
In Rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) replace depends on objections or
notice with depends on objections, notice, or consent.
}}
Agoran Consent depends on objections.
--
Charles Walker
On 31 July 2011 01:18, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2011 23:21, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deregister.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to withdraw all
previous support or
On 31 July 2011 03:48, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 19:48, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Walker wrote:
On 24 July 2011 19:11, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
The relevant announcements, in order:
1) Pavitra attempted (with the
On 31 July 2011 01:17, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2011 17:21, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
A person CAN taunt the police by announcement specifying an
integer from 1 to 14 inclusive. Doing so is the Class-N Crime
of Naughtiness,
On 31 July 2011 03:36, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: A successful economy must have some other objective (AI=2)
{{
Repeal rule 2332 (Winning by Points).
}}
As I've stated, I oppose using points as economy until they are no longer
win as soon as you have X points
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 04:21, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 31 July 2011 03:36, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: A successful economy must have some other objective (AI=2)
{{
Repeal rule 2332 (Winning by Points).
}}
As I've stated, I oppose
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:19, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.cawrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 04:16, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On 26 July 2011 11:54, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to deregister Sgeo.
I intend,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:21 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
CFJ: An action taken with Agoran Consent depends on objections or
notice as used in Rule 1728.
Arguments:
Arguably, Consent depends on objections.
Of course Consent depends on objections. Whether it goes through or
not depends
Background: Currently, one can pay two FINE and a Spending Action with
the same Points.
Proposal: Payment (AI = 2)
{{
Create a new rule titled Payment with Power 2 and the following text:
To pay a unit of an asset is to destroy that unit while
designating exactly one purpose (such as
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Charles Reiss woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
Background: Currently, one can pay two FINE and a Spending Action with
the same Points.
This is pretty similar to my proposal General Costs, which failed
due to a bug. This reminds me to submit a fixed version, hope you
12 matches
Mail list logo
