DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ proposals
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:57 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: - REMIT: The case becomes open again, and the current judge is recused. The Arbitor SHALL NOT assign em to the case again unless no other eligible judges have displayed interest in judging. If no eligible judges have *ever* displayed interest in judging, or just recently? If two people have expressed interest in judging but have both been remitted, is the Arbitor prohibited from assigning either one to the case? --the Warrigal
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ proposals
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Tanner Swett tannersw...@gmail.com wrote: If two people have expressed interest in judging but have both been remitted, is the Arbitor prohibited from assigning either one to the case? Good point. I will amend.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Results for Proposal 7757
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:49 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the following proposals. For each decision, the options available to Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).] CoE: The options for the decision are FOR and AGAINST. ID Author(s) AI Title - 7757+ scshunt1.0 IADoP Titling + is not one of *, x, or !... Oops, copy-pasto. I think that the resolution is unambiguous because I listed it in the text of adopted proposals -scshunt
