Re: DIS: Official rules?

2015-08-16 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I'm sending that same textfile from the command line... somewhere in > lines that aren't flush, an extra space appears? You can see that didn't happen when I was the Rulekeepor: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official

DIS: Re: BUS: could agora be nearly web 2.0?

2015-08-16 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/ not bad if you make it do lists properly (including indent). I like the style.

DIS: FLR lint [attn: G.]

2015-08-16 Thread omd
- Rule 2448 is missing "History:" - Missing revision number in "Amended() by Proposal 7766 (scshunt), 24 July 2015" - Wrong date format in "Created by Proposal 7729 (Henri), 11 Feb 2015" (there is more inconsistency in the older dates, but that's a bit more work to fix - I didn't know this before)

Re: DIS: Official rules?

2015-08-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, omd wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, omd wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> By the way, did you notice that the copy in the archives indents the > >> Rule Text a couple extra spaces? But not the dividing . So > >> if you look

Re: DIS: Official rules?

2015-08-16 Thread omd
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, omd wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> By the way, did you notice that the copy in the archives indents the >> Rule Text a couple extra spaces? But not the dividing . So >> if you look in the archives, the text runs over the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: $$$$

2015-08-16 Thread omd
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Luis Ressel wrote: > I'd be grateful if you could try to use a maximum line length of ~70 > chars for your proposals (the Rulekeepor would probably be happy, too). (The Rulekeepor needs to rewrap the rule text anyway after indenting it properly, so it shouldn't ma

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7785-86

2015-08-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
Tritto. > On Aug 16, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Sprocklem wrote: >> On 2015-08-16 16:28, Luis Ressel wrote: >>> ID Author(s) AI Title >>> - >>> 7785* G. 1.0 The New Map >> FOR >>> 7786* sc

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: $$$$

2015-08-16 Thread Gaelan Steele
Oh, I did 80 characters. Whoops! > On Aug 16, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Luis Ressel wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:25:37 -0700 > Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> I submit this proposal: >> >> >> Title: >> Author: Gaelan

DIS: Re: BUS: Absence

2015-08-16 Thread Sean Hunt
On Aug 16, 2015 6:39 PM, "Luis Ressel" wrote: > > I'll be away for the next three weeks, so I resign Promotor. > > I'll keep ADoP if that's okay; I'll miss one report deadline, but I > don't think one missing ADoP report will be a problem. Of course, feel > free to deputise if you disagree. > > Al

DIS: Re: BUS: $$$$

2015-08-16 Thread Luis Ressel
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:25:37 -0700 Gaelan Steele wrote: > I submit this proposal: > > > Title: > Author: Gaelan > AI: 1 > > Create the power-1 rule “$$$” with this text: > [..] I'd be grateful if you could tr

Re: DIS: Official rules?

2015-08-16 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:00 -0400, omd wrote: > - More generally, there should be a guide for new players. For > inspiration, here is a 20-year-old(!) Agora Guidebook: > http://agora.qoid.us/www.fysh.org/~zefram/agora/agora_vanyel0/agora/guidebook.html It's surprising how much has changed, and ho

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] (corrected) Census

2015-08-16 Thread Edward Murphy
Warrigal wrote: Player 501: Murphy (Ed Murphy) Note to self, deregister again before the end of the year.

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Scam fix

2015-08-16 Thread Sean Hunt
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Edward Murphy wrote: > Proposal: Scam fix > (AI = 3) > > Amend Rule 955 (Determining the Will of Agora) by replacing > >otherwise if the strength of FOR is equal to or > greater than the decisions adoption index and the ration > with >

DIS: Re: BUS: Some proposals

2015-08-16 Thread Edward Murphy
Catching up on backlog. scshunt wrote: provided that the Promotor always spending power no less than 1 less than the greatest spending power among offices, "provided that no office's spending power exceeds that of Promotor by m