On 2015-08-18 00:22, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Proposal “Discussion Redirection” with AI 3 {
> Create the rule “Discussion Redirection” with Power 1 {
> If a message is sent to a Discussion forum that is clearly intended to
> be sent to a Public forum, it SHALL be treated as if it were sent
On 17 August 2015 at 07:21, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> comment, please:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
>
>
>
>
Neat!
Not searchable by ctrl-f. Could that be arranged?
--
- Tiger
I think I'd say that any intentional line break constitutes a
paragraph break, except in unusual cases such as mailing addresses,
poetry, and ASCII art. Therefore, list items separated by intentional
line breaks are separate paragraphs (and may be multiple paragraphs
each). Blank lines don't really
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:01 PM, omd wrote:
> > == CFJ 3452 ==
> >
> > The text of Rule 1728/33 contains exactly 14 paragraphs.
> >
> > ==
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:01 PM, omd wrote:
> == CFJ 3452 ==
>
> The text of Rule 1728/33 contains exactly 14 paragraphs.
>
>
G., why is the presence/absence of a
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:01 PM, omd wrote:
> Rule 2429 puts special status on "paragraphs" when considering
> whitespace. However, paragraphs are not defined.
> Rule 1728 consists of several nested lists. Some list items
> are separated by a blank line, some list items aren't. The
> first bloc
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Thanks! Indexing is definitely something I'm thinking about.
> Also thinking about mouseover text that has snippets of definitions
> (e.g. only the single bullet that defines "SHOULD" could pop up).
Just for reference, an old (2010) attempt o
Thanks! Indexing is definitely something I'm thinking about.
Also thinking about mouseover text that has snippets of definitions
(e.g. only the single bullet that defines "SHOULD" could pop up).
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> One piece of advice: link terms used to the relevant rul
One piece of advice: link terms used to the relevant rules, i.e. whenever a
rule contains a text “SHOULD,” that text could be a link to the rule “Mother,
May I?”.
> On Aug 16, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> comment, please:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, omd wrote:
> - Rule 2448 is missing "History:"
> - Missing revision number in "Amended() by Proposal 7766 (scshunt), 24
> July 2015"
> - Wrong date format in "Created by Proposal 7729 (Henri), 11 Feb 2015"
> (there is more inconsistency in the older dates, but that's a bit m
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > comment, please:
> > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
>
> I like it. I personally would prefer if everything were expanded
> initially, and then maybe there could be buttons for c
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > comment, please:
> > > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
> >
> > I like it. I personally would prefer if everything were expanded
> >
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
>
> not bad if you make it do lists properly (including indent). I like the
> style.
Thanks... shamefully stolen style of course. Looking at it made
me
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> FWIW in my copy of the SLR from August 11, it's under the 7.
Aha! Mystery solved. The last few SLRs were straight-out
forwards and forwards of forwards, of the July 24 copy.
Each forward added a space for some reason.
The original 24-July post i
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Copy-paste from here:
https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/rkeep/current_slr.txt
Rule 1688/7 (Power=3)
The Power of an entity is a non-negative rational number. An
("T" is under the 6).
From here:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:27 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2015 9:16 AM, "Tanner Swett" wrote:
> >
> > I submit the quoted proposal.
> >
> > —the Warrigal
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, Trust Tokens were repealed as a result of our victory.
I don't think Eras are necessarily tied to wins? Given
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, Trust Tokens were repealed as a result of our victory.
Say what?
On Aug 17, 2015 9:16 AM, "Tanner Swett" wrote:
>
> I submit the quoted proposal.
>
> —the Warrigal
Unless I'm mistaken, Trust Tokens were repealed as a result of our victory.
-scshunt
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> comment, please:
> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/agora/rules/
I like it. I personally would prefer if everything were expanded
initially, and then maybe there could be buttons for collapsing.
Also, you seem to have a couple of element
19 matches
Mail list logo
