DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Economic Flexibility

2017-01-13 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: Let me make sure I understand the intent: if this only defined a switch, then proposals of AI=1 could adjust it. Because it’s in a rule with P=3, only proposals with AI=3 or higher can adjust the switch, and only if they also adjust the rule text? I

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Economic Flexibility

2017-01-13 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Jan 14, 2017, at 2:26 AM, nichdel wrote: > Amend the rule titled "Economics" by replacing: > > Any attempt by a player to PAY any amount that would make > eir own balance negative is INEFFECTIVE, rules to the contrary > notwithstanding. > > With: > >

Re: DIS: Game-state proposals?

2017-01-13 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > I should add: for economies, surprise resets, or the have-nots taking from > > the haves via proposals, can be very controversial and really annoy people > > who have