On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Let me make sure I understand the intent: if this only defined a switch,
then proposals of AI=1 could adjust it. Because it’s in a rule with P=3,
only proposals with AI=3 or higher can adjust the switch, and only if
they also adjust the rule text?
I
On Jan 14, 2017, at 2:26 AM, nichdel wrote:
> Amend the rule titled "Economics" by replacing:
>
> Any attempt by a player to PAY any amount that would make
> eir own balance negative is INEFFECTIVE, rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding.
>
> With:
>
>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > I should add: for economies, surprise resets, or the have-nots taking from
> > the haves via proposals, can be very controversial and really annoy people
> > who have
3 matches
Mail list logo