DIS: Re: BUS: I Point the Finger

On Jun 13, 2017, at 4:38 AM, V.J Rada wrote: > I Point the Finger at Cuddlebeam. On 25 May he said "I pledge to not > submit Judgement on CFJ 3509." > (https://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2017-May/034882.html > >

Re: DIS: new player limits and bonuses

> On Jun 12, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > We used to have a "newbie" category that lasted at least a month. > [This is inspired by CuddleBeam's recent CFJ, but not just because > of that, CuddleBeam, there are several instances in the archives > of new

Re: DIS: new player limits and bonuses

> On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:05 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > > >The proposal things > > Maybe its just me but I'm not particularly motivated to make proposals. Its a > bit because of Adam Smith-like economics and personal greed I guess. > > I know that using my shinies to

DIS: Noteworthy judgements

Since we’ve had a rather large number of new CFJs recently, I figure it’s worth sanity-checking the results of that process. Which recent-ish judgements should be called out as particularly well thought-out or well-presented, or should serve as a model for future judgements? -o

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Weekly Report

Gameplay note: On Jun 14, 2017, at 3:23 AM, Quazie wrote: > COE - I paid 30 shinies to pend my 5 oroposals In the interests of friendliness and expedience, I choose to interpret > For each proposal submitted above, of which there are 5, I N shinies to Agora > to pend

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

> On Jun 14, 2017, at 4:17 AM, V.J Rada wrote: > > "As Referee, I believe there are no outstanding rules violations in the > preceding Agoran week, for which a Card has not already been issued" > > For clarity, this doesn't mean the investigations into my finger pointing

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Payday (revision 2)

A two-fer: On Jun 14, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> Sprocklem 10 >> 天火狐 10 > > The 10 after 天火狐 isn't lined up with the rest. I'm viewing with a monospaced >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Payday (revision 2)

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: Sprocklem 10 天火狐 10 The 10 after 天火狐 isn't lined up with the rest. I'm viewing with a monospaced font and all three CJK characters are double width, which ISTR someone said was right. Greetings,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Payday (revision 1)

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > No, I'm not missing it.  It's literally a claim that there was an error, and > > e did so.   So e expressed a doubt through the method of claiming there was > > an error > > which is exactly what

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Payday (revision 1)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > No, I'm not missing it.  It's literally a claim that there was an error, and > e did so.   So e expressed a doubt through the method of claiming there was > an error > which is exactly what the rule says the method consists of (claim of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Payday (revision 1)

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 02:50 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > > As Secretary, it is my pleasure to report that Agora has paid the > > > > following

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Secretary] Payday (revision 1)

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 02:50 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > As Secretary, it is my pleasure to report that Agora has paid the > > following salaries to players: > > CoE: This first attempt at making the report was inaccurate (and was > withdrawn by its

DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

"As Referee, I believe there are no outstanding rules violations in the preceding Agoran week, for which a Card has not already been issued" For clarity, this doesn't mean the investigations into my finger pointing are closed or anything yeah? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Owen Jacobson

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7858-7863

I vote as follows: > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee (sh.) > - > 7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7 Aris 6 FOR. Aris, your commitment to making this happen is

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3497 Judged FALSE by Aris

> Judge's Arguments: > > I was considering playing along with this, but frankly, given > everything that's happened, I'm not in the mood. Even the caller has > practically admitted that this CFJ is frivolous (the message was > entitled "A little levity"). The only sensible reading of the rule is