Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
I should know this, but what's your nickname, David? Are you a player? Sorry. On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 3:50 PM, David Nicol wrote: > you do realize of course that the moats of Fantasy Rules Castle are stocked > with vicious leopleurodons and the southwest corner has a vicious unpatched > radiation leak, though, so you not? > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, David Nicol wrote: > >> don't let me stop you ... the beginning of every round is without >> constraint. >> >> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Cuddle Beam >> wrote: >> >>> what about an Agoran invasion of FRC >>> >>> except a good one >>> >>> because Christmas >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:50 AM, David Nicol >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Ørjan Johansen >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >>> > > >>> > > If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? >>> Like, >>> > >> it's less about playing the rules than just making them for >>> aesthetics >>> > and >>> > >> fantasy. >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding >>> scale >>> > > between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly >>> > story >>> > > telling. >>> > > >>> > > Greetings, >>> > > Ørjan. >>> > > >>> > >>> > lately it seems to all be olympic ping-pong --- there's a serve, >>> sometimes >>> > it gets returned, very occasionally there's a volley. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to >>> > refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to >> refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) >> > > > > -- > “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to > refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
you do realize of course that the moats of Fantasy Rules Castle are stocked with vicious leopleurodons and the southwest corner has a vicious unpatched radiation leak, though, so you not? On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, David Nicol wrote: > don't let me stop you ... the beginning of every round is without > constraint. > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Cuddle Beam > wrote: > >> what about an Agoran invasion of FRC >> >> except a good one >> >> because Christmas >> >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:50 AM, David Nicol >> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Ørjan Johansen >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> > > >> > > If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? >> Like, >> > >> it's less about playing the rules than just making them for >> aesthetics >> > and >> > >> fantasy. >> > >> >> > > >> > > Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding >> scale >> > > between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly >> > story >> > > telling. >> > > >> > > Greetings, >> > > Ørjan. >> > > >> > >> > lately it seems to all be olympic ping-pong --- there's a serve, >> sometimes >> > it gets returned, very occasionally there's a volley. >> > >> > -- >> > “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to >> > refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) >> > >> > > > > -- > “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to > refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) > -- “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798)
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
don't let me stop you ... the beginning of every round is without constraint. On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > what about an Agoran invasion of FRC > > except a good one > > because Christmas > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:50 AM, David Nicol wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Ørjan Johansen > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > > > > > If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? > Like, > > >> it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics > > and > > >> fantasy. > > >> > > > > > > Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding scale > > > between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly > > story > > > telling. > > > > > > Greetings, > > > Ørjan. > > > > > > > lately it seems to all be olympic ping-pong --- there's a serve, > sometimes > > it gets returned, very occasionally there's a volley. > > > > -- > > “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to > > refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) > > > -- “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798)
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
what about an Agoran invasion of FRC except a good one because Christmas On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:50 AM, David Nicol wrote: > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Ørjan Johansen > wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > > > If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? Like, > >> it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics > and > >> fantasy. > >> > > > > Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding scale > > between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly > story > > telling. > > > > Greetings, > > Ørjan. > > > > lately it seems to all be olympic ping-pong --- there's a serve, sometimes > it gets returned, very occasionally there's a volley. > > -- > “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to > refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798) >
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? Like, >> it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics and >> fantasy. >> > > Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding scale > between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly story > telling. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > lately it seems to all be olympic ping-pong --- there's a serve, sometimes it gets returned, very occasionally there's a volley. -- “no man should be compelled to do what the laws do not require; nor to refrain from acts which the laws permit.” Calder v. Bull (U.S. 1798)
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
I also still play. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Dec 25, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> >>> If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? Like, >>> it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics and >>> fantasy. >> >> Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding scale >> between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly story >> telling. > > It's still entirely up to the judge each round. I think I noticed Murphy > was the judge of the current or just-ended round...? > > Reference: frc-p...@googlegroups.com > > -G. > > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: merry christmas guys
Happy Holidays. Vives annos! (this is not technically correct, but is close). Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Dec 25, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > Joyous seasonal fiestas > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 3:38 PM, ATMunn wrote: > >> That doesn't even matter anyways, the message was NttPF. >> >> And yes, Merry Christmas :) >> >> >> On 12/25/2017 8:55 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >>> see title >>> >>> I'm sorry, but I believe precedent is that this is not clear enough for >>> an action. >>> >>> Also, Merry Christmas! >>> >>> Ørjan. >>> >> signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > > If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? Like, > > it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics and > > fantasy. > > Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding scale > between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly story > telling. It's still entirely up to the judge each round. I think I noticed Murphy was the judge of the current or just-ended round...? Reference: frc-p...@googlegroups.com -G.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? Like, it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics and fantasy. Back when I played, that varied from round to round, on a sliding scale between some rounds being mostly logic puzzles and some being mostly story telling. Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
If I've getting this correctly, FRC is heavily roleplay-based, yes? Like, it's less about playing the rules than just making them for aesthetics and fantasy. On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 07:01 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I have a few (but far from all) in mind - will publish and/or > > > choose from any alternates provided - maybe people can > > > vote on the best... (private submission to me preferred to > > > maintain suspense...:). > > > > I was actually interpreting this more like a Fantasy Rules Contest > > starter. > > Oh that's a good model. I'm not gonna judge or make rules for tho it I'll > just > collate any that people post (+ my own), once a day. Maybe mix and > match. >+1 for FRC regs showing up, I'll read em. > > > I've been thinking about resurrecting that recently, although probably > > on a site dedicated to playing games rather than among other nomic > > players. The biggest change I'd make to the regulations would be to > > favour the more subjective meanings of "consistency" over the rather > > degenerate situation of fantasy rules directly talking to each other. > > > > Perhaps I should at least suggest a set of regulations here so that the > > loophole-finders and scamsters here can let me know if they'd work or > > not? > > > > -- > > ais523 > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 07:01 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I have a few (but far from all) in mind - will publish and/or > > choose from any alternates provided - maybe people can > > vote on the best... (private submission to me preferred to > > maintain suspense...:). > > I was actually interpreting this more like a Fantasy Rules Contest > starter. Oh that's a good model. I'm not gonna judge or make rules for tho it I'll just collate any that people post (+ my own), once a day. Maybe mix and match. +1 for FRC regs showing up, I'll read em. > I've been thinking about resurrecting that recently, although probably > on a site dedicated to playing games rather than among other nomic > players. The biggest change I'd make to the regulations would be to > favour the more subjective meanings of "consistency" over the rather > degenerate situation of fantasy rules directly talking to each other. > > Perhaps I should at least suggest a set of regulations here so that the > loophole-finders and scamsters here can let me know if they'd work or > not? > > -- > ais523 >
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 07:01 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I have a few (but far from all) in mind - will publish and/or > choose from any alternates provided - maybe people can > vote on the best... (private submission to me preferred to > maintain suspense...:). I was actually interpreting this more like a Fantasy Rules Contest starter. I've been thinking about resurrecting that recently, although probably on a site dedicated to playing games rather than among other nomic players. The biggest change I'd make to the regulations would be to favour the more subjective meanings of "consistency" over the rather degenerate situation of fantasy rules directly talking to each other. Perhaps I should at least suggest a set of regulations here so that the loophole-finders and scamsters here can let me know if they'd work or not? -- ais523
DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
- A little bit of Monica in my life - A little bit of Erica by my side - A little bit of Rita is all I need - A little bit of Tina is what I see - A little bit of Sandra in the sun - A little bit of Mary all night long - A little bit of Jessica here I am On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On the first day of Nomic, the Forum gave to me > > - A ruleset of perfect clarity. > > (To be continued) > > > > > >
Re: DIS: merry christmas guys
Joyous seasonal fiestas On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 3:38 PM, ATMunn wrote: > That doesn't even matter anyways, the message was NttPF. > > And yes, Merry Christmas :) > > > On 12/25/2017 8:55 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> see title >>> >> >> I'm sorry, but I believe precedent is that this is not clear enough for >> an action. >> >> Also, Merry Christmas! >> >> Ørjan. >> >
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
I have a few (but far from all) in mind - will publish and/or choose from any alternates provided - maybe people can vote on the best... (private submission to me preferred to maintain suspense...:). On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, ATMunn wrote: > Are you taking suggestions here? > > On 12/25/2017 9:26 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > On the first day of Nomic, the Forum gave to me > > > > - A ruleset of perfect clarity. > > > > (To be continued) > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: merry christmas guys
That doesn't even matter anyways, the message was NttPF. And yes, Merry Christmas :) On 12/25/2017 8:55 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, VJ Rada wrote: see title I'm sorry, but I believe precedent is that this is not clear enough for an action. Also, Merry Christmas! Ørjan.
DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
Are you taking suggestions here? On 12/25/2017 9:26 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On the first day of Nomic, the Forum gave to me - A ruleset of perfect clarity. (To be continued)
DIS: Re: OFF: [Reportor] Holiday Arts Supplement
Now THAT would be a sight to see. On 2017-12-26 01:26, Kerim Aydin wrote: On the first day of Nomic, the Forum gave to me - A ruleset of perfect clarity. (To be continued)
Re: DIS: merry christmas guys
On Mon, 25 Dec 2017, VJ Rada wrote: see title I'm sorry, but I believe precedent is that this is not clear enough for an action. Also, Merry Christmas! Ørjan.
DIS: merry christmas guys
see title -- >From V.J. Rada
