Re: DIS: Re: Proto-Contract: Micro-Proposals

Alright, here’s a V2: { This contract accepts shinies as long as it has fewer than ((Pend Cost) + 1) shinies. It accepts no other assets. This contract maintains a piece of state known as the Proposal Puddle, containing a set of micro-proposals each consisting of a title, adoption index,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Registrar] Zombie auctions for Quazie, 天火狐, and nichdel

The issue is that the Zombie Auctions rule specifically may prevent that. It has higher power then the newer auction rules, and says: The winner of the auction, if any, is the player who bids the highest number of shinies... This makes the winner to the player who bid the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Registrar] Zombie auctions for Quazie, 天火狐, and nichdel

New bids are supposed to overwrite old ones, don't know if it actually works. On 2/15/2018 1:23 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: If you’re right about newer bids overwriting older ones, we should be fine. Gaelan On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Ah -

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Registrar] Zombie auctions for Quazie, 天火狐, and nichdel

If you’re right about newer bids overwriting older ones, we should be fine. Gaelan > On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Ah - entirely forgot about that. Well hopefully my insertion didn't make > things worse then. > > >> On Thu, 15 Feb

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Registrar] Zombie auctions for Quazie, 天火狐, and nichdel

Ah - entirely forgot about that. Well hopefully my insertion didn't make things worse then. On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I resolve my intent to ratify without objection. CB’s and my non-real-integer > bids should no longer exist. > > Gaelan > > > On Feb 15, 2018, at 9:54