DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8016-8023

On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: // ID: 8023 Title: Zombie Lots Adoption index: 2.0 Author: G. Co-authors: Aris The Registrar CAN flip the master switch of a zombie lot from Agora to that lot's winner after the

DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Monthly housekeeping

I support the intents for o, Quazie, and PSS. Gaelan > On Mar 6, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > I flip o's master switch to Agora. > I flip pokes' master switch to Agora. > > > I intend to deregister, with 3 Agoran Consent, each of: > omd, o,

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8016-8023

A search through my archives shows that I've been using it since it became my responsibility to list quorum in my distributions. That happened with the adoption of Proposal 7853, "Close Ancient Loopholes", by ais523, on Monday June 5th 2017, which also set quorum to always be an integer value. So

DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Monthly housekeeping

Wow, I didn't even realize how long it's been since PSS posted. On 3/6/2018 7:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: I flip o's master switch to Agora. I flip pokes' master switch to Agora. I intend to deregister, with 3 Agoran Consent, each of: omd, o, Quazie, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, pokes

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8016-8023

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > All of the below proposals met the quorum of 3.0. > > How did the ".0" get into quorum? I've seen it be used here for quite a > while, but we didn't use it historically and there's no rules reason

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8016-8023

On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:15 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > All of the below proposals met the quorum of 3.0. How did the ".0" get into quorum? I've seen it be used here for quite a while, but we didn't use it historically and there's no rules reason for it. It's not an index, after all (and under