DIS: History of rules reenacted by PAoaM

I'm hoping to deputize rulekeepor so we can have an up to date FLR again, but I'm lost on some parts. PAoaM reenacts a bunch of rules, eg 1993/1, 1994/0, 1995/0, but I can't find any of them on the archives and they aren't on the github reposity. I'd like to find them so I can list the revision

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] the Great Zombie Auction for April

I bid 3. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:16 PM, Corona wrote: > I bid 3. > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > > > > > > I bid 3 coins in this auction. -G. > > > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > I bid 4

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Land Auctions for April week 1

I bid 12 on 4 and 5. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 08:41 Gaelan Steele wrote: > 13 on 1, 12 on 2 > > Gaelan > > > On Apr 5, 2018, at 6:24 AM, ATMunn wrote: > > > > I bid 12 coins on auction 3. > > > >> On 4/3/2018 5:40 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> 10 on 1-3 >

Re: DIS: Proto: Formalized Precedent

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:36 PM Gaelan Steele wrote: > Wow, thanks for taking the time to write this—it’s really interesting and > I think you have a lot of valid points. (Side note: interesting to see it > from a British perspective. My understanding of American law is that we

Re: DIS: Proto: Formalized Precedent

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > I might favor some > carefully implemented system of injunctions or judicial orders that > allowed judges to remedy the short term harm caused by a > misunderstanding or rule violation... It took an incredibly complex (read: "very carefully

Re: DIS: Proto: Formalized Precedent

Wow, thanks for taking the time to write this—it’s really interesting and I think you have a lot of valid points. (Side note: interesting to see it from a British perspective. My understanding of American law is that we still operate under the “precedent is perfect” idea, which may have