Me too, if I can find the time I'm going to make the proposal.
~Corona
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I replied to Discussion right after bidding closed to point them out
> clearly but it was under the very informative Subject Re:[Herald] Weekly
> Report or so
Sorry, I replied to Discussion right after bidding closed to point them out
clearly but it was under the very informative Subject Re:[Herald] Weekly
Report or something.
I'm now a complete convert of going to the hash-supported secret (or at
least not time-rushed) bidding method.
On Tue, 10 Ju
Official decree from the Cartographor:
Please, in all future auctions, if you bid outside of the main thread, I
would really appreciate it if you contacted me privately, telling me the
auction number and bid amount. I'll include a memo similar to the one above
in each land auction announcement.
On
Really sorry, but the auction results are still incorrect. I don't think
you won any of the auctions.
Yesterday, I first bid like this:
> AUCTION 1: the land unit at (-6, -1)
> If I am not the current highest bidder in this auction, I bid
> 46 coins.
>
> AUCTION 2: the land unit at (-6, +1)
>
Yeah, those were the only bid messages that weren't on your photo I'm
pretty sure. (I was being paranoid about a snipe from Corona between
the two messages, that's why there were two).
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> To clarify, no bids were placed in between these two messages?
>
Thanks!
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I transfer all the fabric from the loom I'm on to myself and then transfer
> it all to G..
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 12:54 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> > Fails; you need to transfer the fabric from the loom to yourself first.
> >
> > -twg
To clarify, no bids were placed in between these two messages?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 12:40 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Many apologies, but this is missing all the bids I submitted in the last
> hour
> of the auction. Those were submitted here:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agorano
Fails; you need to transfer the fabric from the loom to yourself first.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On July 10, 2018 6:52 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
>
> I transfer all the fabric I have to G..
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 15:37 Reuben Staley reuben.sta...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
I think that should resolve any CFJs, except for the most pedantic.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:51 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Sure, here it is.
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 11:46 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > To avoid the inevitable CFJ, could yo
To avoid the inevitable CFJ, could you send that photo as an attachment.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:44 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Corona wins all the quoted auctions for 38 coins.
>
> I'm out of town and have been therefore unable to use my computer for a
> while. Therefore, this resolution was wr
oh yah it's pretty obvious - no (0) style for invalid rules.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> hm can't remember what I intended I'll ponder and respond.
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > While not explicitly stated in the rules, I read them as sugges
It's a fair cop, but in retrospect it cost me 60 Coins needlessly (over
my more visible bids) so there's some instant karma for me there too :P
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Something something black kettle...
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On July 9,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I am a little disappointed that you're making Points totally replace
> Economics and the rest of PAoaM - not because I'm utterly against a full
> repeal in itself, but because I've been spending the last few days
> working on a series of proposals
VALID, and a set of intriguing arguments that would take some refuting
Counsellor. Style +2.0.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I humbly submit the following Docket #1 argument:
>
> Eff-arr-quee should be considered vastly superior to all other games.
> I will refute the arguments o
1 - Yes, definitely. 2 - Yes, definitely. 3 - Sorry, can't.
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I'm in the _very_ early stages of looking into creating a new MU* for
> Agora. The codebase would be hosted on the Agora GitHub org, and any
> player would be free to contribute code. My ski
hm can't remember what I intended I'll ponder and respond.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> While not explicitly stated in the rules, I read them as suggesting
> that an INVALID rule can not have style points awarded.
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:43 AM Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Oh, also, can you increase the player starting bonus 100, or like quarter
> the coins to points ratio? This is going to be hideously unbalanced for a
> long time if we keep this big a coin starting advantage, because it's
> vastly easier to get coins no
While not explicitly stated in the rules, I read them as suggesting
that an INVALID rule can not have style points awarded.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:43 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> This is INVALID As per #6: "for you" doesn't address anyone with "deserved
> respect" (while #6 doesn't supply ev
This is INVALID As per #6: "for you" doesn't address anyone with "deserved
respect" (while #6 doesn't supply every grammatically appropriate address
in the explicit list of titles, the first clause makes it clear that all
forms of address need similar levels of respect - "you" needs to be "your
as you can guess, no no and no
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) Slightly interested.
> 2) Probably not.
> 3) No.
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:21 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> >
> > 1) Yes, it sounds interesting in
1) Slightly interested.
2) Probably not.
3) No.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:21 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> 1) Yes, it sounds interesting in principle. Then again, I said that about the
> birthday tournament as well, and didn't feel like playing in the event.
> 2) Yes, but I can't promise to dev
1) Yes, it sounds interesting in principle. Then again, I said that about the
birthday tournament as well, and didn't feel like playing in the event.
2) Yes, but I can't promise to devote a great deal of time to it. Also, I don't
have much experience with Python.
3) Yes.
-twg
‐‐‐ Origina
I like this system. More incentive to create proposals can't be a bad thing. As
regards fixing the rejection penalty to always be positive, I feel like it
would be more elegant to take adoption index directly into account instead of
just specifying a minimum penalty. Something like (AGAINST * AI
23 matches
Mail list logo
