DIS: Come get your rulesets here!

2018-08-03 Thread Reuben Staley
So I've been on vacation for a while and instead of relaxing like a normal person, I decided to make some more up-to-date rulesets. But not only that. I couldn't figure out how to install the Haskell code's dependencies so I went and rewrote the entire thing in Python. My hope is that with

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-03 Thread Reuben Staley
> G. I believe this is implied by R2509, but I have added a provision in the case that it's not. > Aris That is a valid concern. The reason it is the way it is now is simply that I thought it was funny to include excessively ridiculous words. Nevertheless, I have changed it in the below

Re: DIS: What's it all about then, eh?

2018-08-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
Oh cool, something like weather is really a good idea - in co-op games you're playing against "the board" so you definitely need some randomly-generated adversity. On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > In the Millenial Land System, Land Transfigurations were actually part of a > larger

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-03 Thread Aris Merchant
With G.'s suggestion, this looks pretty great content-wise. I would request that you change "force-feed" to "feed", though, because the real world contexts where the former occurs are somewhat upsetting. -Aris On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:10 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > This reads really clearly

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Revamping movement

2018-08-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
This reads really clearly and I like it this way around. Minor edit: capitalize the CAN and add to that sentence "if it would not reduce eir EP below 0"? (Not sure if it's implied anyway, better safe than sorry?) On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > I believe this institutes a clear

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8066-8077

2018-08-03 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I am sorry. Your message said 8077-8081. > On Aug 3, 2018, at 7:09 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Ah, I see the confusion now - this is in fact the previous batch of proposals > (8066-8076, not 8077-8081). Sorry. > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ >> On August 3, 2018 10:58

Re: Fwd: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8066-8077

2018-08-03 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Ah, I see the confusion now - this is in fact the previous batch of proposals (8066-8076, not 8077-8081). Sorry. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 3, 2018 10:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > AttPF > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Publius Scribonius