DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] [RWO] Routine Worst-Case Cleanup

2018-08-08 Thread Rebecca
I can't resolve this Finger without knowing whether or not the document was incorrect (or indeterminate, which it clearly isn't). Unless anyone can point to a proposal that clearly existed that your ratification claimed did not, and within a timely fashion from the Finger, I will likely acquit.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] [RWO] Routine Worst-Case Cleanup

2018-08-08 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Actually, the previous batch was resolved _after_ this batch was distributed, so I believe quorum is only 5 at the moment. It will be higher (at least 7) when the current batch is resolved. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 8, 2018 7:51 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > The old

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] [RWO] Routine Worst-Case Cleanup

2018-08-08 Thread Kerim Aydin
The old precedents don't apply. Previously the rules said something like "a proposal is created by publishing a body of text that is clearly marked as a proposal" which meant that you could accidentally do that if you marked something as a proposal when you distributed. Now it says "create by