DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: Fora (Rule 478, self-ratifying) Discussion irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/##nomic discussion There seems to be a http: in the link, which doesn't work. However, for people without irc: set up,

DIS: Re: BUS: Election updates

Thanks! :) On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > In light of that, I withdraw my candidacy for Herald, since I have no ideas > in particular for reinvigorating patent titles. > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Finger Points & CFJs

I agree. I could not think of any reasons why it would be FALSE, but just wanted to be sure. On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > > D Margaux wrote: > > > > > I initiate two CFJs as follows: > > > > > > (1) The Referee CAN

DIS: Re: BUS: Finger Points & CFJs

On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: > D Margaux wrote: > > > I initiate two CFJs as follows: > > > > (1) The Referee CAN act on behalf of eir zombie to Point the zombie’s > > Finger at a player. > > This is CFJ 3660. I assign it to G. This seems like a straightforward TRUE (even

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Finger Points & CFJs

D Margaux wrote: For what it’s worth, Corona is an interested party in that CFJ—e was one of the players that was fined and the CFJ question is whether that fine against Corona is effective. Noted, I'll support a motion for reconsideration if e judges FALSE. Would anyone else like to join

DIS: Re: BUS: Finger Points & CFJs

For what it’s worth, Corona is an interested party in that CFJ—e was one of the players that was fined and the CFJ question is whether that fine against Corona is effective. On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 6:41 PM Edward Murphy wrote: > D Margaux wrote: > > > I initiate two CFJs as follows: > > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: PTPMFUBGOFTDAODWTVOAWIC

The issue with this is that the Herald CANNOT award 2+ Champion titles simultaneously (I think... by R649 each award is an individual act). So if e says "I award Champion to twg and D Margaux" then D Margaux is the one who was "most recently" awarded it. With simultaneous wins, this shifts the

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: PTPMFUBGOFTDAODWTVOAWIC

I’m not sure this is actually necessary. If the win is contested, the Prime Minister can still comply with the rule by saying, “I appoint X to be Speaker if and only if e won the game,” and that conditional would be resolved when the CFJ is resolved. On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 5:58 PM Timon

DIS: Re: BUS: Finger Points & CFJs

Aargh. I _want_ to favour these CFJs but I will be out of the country for a week or so starting Wednesday and can't guarantee I'll be able to judge them in a timely fashion. :( (I'm not expecting anyone to do anything about it, I just wanted to express general frustration.) -twg ‐‐‐

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

Oh, yes, you're correct, actually. Thank you. In that case the tally would look like this: ++ |8089| +--++ |Aris | FF | |G.| P | |Murphy|| |Trigon| F | |twg | F | +--++ |Kenyon|| +--++ |FOR

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I would like to request that nobody CoE the resolution of proposal 8089, > because it wouldn't change the outcome of the decision and would have a > knock-on effect on this distribution's quorum which I would much rather > not have to think

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

Whups! If nothing else, this sure puts em at the bottom of the pile for the next auction! (I'll try to remember to include blot info when doing auctions in future). On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > On Sunday, September 16, 2018 3:42 PM, D Margaux > wrote: > > Person

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Quorum Reduction

Aris wrote: Amend Rule 879, Quorum, by changing its second paragraph to read as follows: The quorum that an Agoran Decision gains as it is created can be defined by other rules of power 2 or greater. If no other rule defines the quorum of an Agoran Decision, the quorum for that

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Award of Victory

I'm not a big fan of this - if we award almost-scams (assuming it didn't work) with proposal-based AI-1 championship wins what's the darn point? Other option (preferable): ask the herald to attempt to award champion with 2 Agoran Consent - at least that ensures that the support is more of a

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Empty Draft

Correct as far as I can tell, but if you wait until I've resolved proposal 8093, there'll be another 12 proposals to vote on. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, September 16, 2018 7:32 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I'm under the impression that no proposals were submitted by

DIS: [Promotor] Empty Draft

I'm under the impression that no proposals were submitted by anyone other than me this week. If I somehow missed one, I'd really appreciate a reminder. Thanks, Aris