DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8123-8132
Votes inline > On Nov 11, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > IDAuthor(s) AITitle > --- > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence FOR > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed FOR > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing FOR > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs FOR > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards AGAINST because unconditional income is a good thing. > 8128 twg 2.0 [1] AGAINST—this is just Speaker and Distributor, right? Both seem like they are worthy of a stipend. > 8129 twg, Trigon, G. 3.0 Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2 FOR > 8130 Gaelan 2.0 Law is Ambiguous Word Act FOR > 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act AGAINST, this is already handled by 2552/0¶1. > 8132 Aris1.0 Website Ruleset Update Petition FALSE > > > [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > > // > ID: 8123 > Title: Independence > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Gaelan > Co-authors: > > > Prepend “Such an action is known as a dependent action.” to the > beginning of the last paragraph of rule 1728, “Dependent Actions.” > > // > ID: 8124 > Title: Only proposals should be distributed > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: This was pretty useless back in the day and it still is. If > someone decides they need this mechanic for anything, just reenact > it. ] > > Repeal Rule 2515 "Distributing Assets". > > // > ID: 8125 > Title: Time periods are confusing > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: The current way is a really roundabout way of doing it, in my > opinion. I'm not sure if this is any better, to be honest, but > I think it has some merit. ] > > Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by: > replacing the following: > 2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N > Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the intent was announced at > least 4 days earlier > > 3. If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the intent > was announced at least T earlier. > with: > 2. The intent was announced at least T earlier. If T is undefined, > it is instead considered to be 4 days if the action is not With > N Support; otherwise 0 days. > > and by renumbering the list accordingly. > > // > ID: 8126 > Title: High-level asset verbs > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > > [ COMMENT: This terminology is ripped from the coins rule and applies to > all assets. I really like this one. ] > > Amend Rule 2577 "Asset Actions" by replacing the second paragraph with > the following three paragraphs: > For an entity to earn an asset is for that asset to be created in > that entity's possession. To grant an entity an asset is to create > it in eir possession. > > For an entity to lose an asset is for that asset to be destroyed > from that entity's possession. To revoke an asset from an entity > is to destroy it from that entity's possession. > > For entity A to take an asset from entity B is to transfer it from > entity B to entity A. > > > Amend Rule 2559 "Paydays" by replacing its text with: > Whenever a Payday occurs, the following events happen in order: > > 1. Each player first earns 10 coins; then > > 2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or > more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were > levied on em for eir conduct in that office during that time, > that player earns 5 coins. > > The occurrence of Paydays is secured. At the beginning of each > month, a Payday occurs. > > > Amend Rule 2499 "Welcome Packages" by replacing its text with: > If a player has not received a Welcome Package since e most > recently registered, any player CAN cause em to receive one by > announcement. > > When a player receives a Welcome Package, e earns 10 coins. > > > Amend Rule 2555 "Blots" by replacing the paragraph beginning "To Lefy a > Fine" with: > To Levy a Fine of N on a person, where N is a positive integer, is > to grant em N blots. To expunge a bl
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8123-8132
Ah, I see. Never mind, then.
On 11/11/2018 09:17 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an amendment is ignored, so the proposal still works.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 8:09 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
On 11/11/2018 08:52 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
FOR. Trigon, this is one of the most beautiful changes I've seen since
I became a player. I'm not sure why I find it so elegant, but I do.
There's a typo ("lefy" instead of "levy"), but it's Rule 105
inconsequential.
If this proposal passes, I'll publish an intent to clean it.
--
Trigon
--
Trigon
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8123-8132
No, it's where you said "Amend Rule 2555 'Blots' by replacing the
paragraph beginning 'To Lefy a Fine' with:". So it doesn't appear in
the amended text. Furthermore, Rule 105 says that an inconsequential
misquotation in an amendment is ignored, so the proposal still works.
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 8:09 PM Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> On 11/11/2018 08:52 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >> 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
> > FOR. Trigon, this is one of the most beautiful changes I've seen since
> > I became a player. I'm not sure why I find it so elegant, but I do.
> > There's a typo ("lefy" instead of "levy"), but it's Rule 105
> > inconsequential.
>
> If this proposal passes, I'll publish an intent to clean it.
>
> --
> Trigon
DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8123-8132
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 8:05 PM Reuben Staley wrote: > > On 11/11/2018 08:34 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:> IDAuthor(s) > AITitle > > --- > > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence > FOR > > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed > FOR > > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing > FOR, though I'm sure there's a better way I could've written this. > > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs > FOR > > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards > FOR > > 8128 twg 2.0 [1] > PRESENT. I don't know what to think about it. > > 8129 twg, Trigon, G. 3.0 Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2 > FOR. I think this works fine. > > 8130 Gaelan 2.0 Law is Ambiguous Word Act > FOR > > 8131 天火狐, twg 2.0 V.J. Rada Protection Act > FOR > > 8132 Aris1.0 Website Ruleset Update Petition > AGAINST. I actually did update the website so it supports an FLR that is > up-to-date with the SLR because of a conversation between Aris and me > the other day. But I really just feel like this being a proposal is a > strange choice. TBH, I think I just misread one of your messages. You said "Draft a proposal; Agora shall decide". I thought you were talking about this; rereading, I think you were talking about making the FLR weekly. -Aris
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8123-8132
On 11/11/2018 08:52 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs
FOR. Trigon, this is one of the most beautiful changes I've seen since
I became a player. I'm not sure why I find it so elegant, but I do.
There's a typo ("lefy" instead of "levy"), but it's Rule 105
inconsequential.
If this proposal passes, I'll publish an intent to clean it.
--
Trigon
Re: DIS: Interest Poll: Rulekeepor's Notes
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 04:32 +0100, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > > Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's > > an old tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think > > it would be useful. > > > > If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you > > would like me to include. > > As I recall, the most interesting information in those were when the > Rulekeepor pointed out that a Proposal had not worked as intended. In general, Rulekeepor's notes should likely just contain information on effects of passing a proposal that are not obvious from the proposal text. Things like "the rule that the proposal tries to amend doesn't exist" are needed to make sense of the effect the proposal had on the gamestate. The notes wouldn't be necessary in cases where the proposals actually do what it looks like from their text that they dod. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Interest Poll: Rulekeepor's Notes
Indeed; if I published them that would probably be the bulk of it, along with the IDs of new rules. On 11/11/2018 08:32 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's an old tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think it would be useful. If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you would like me to include. As I recall, the most interesting information in those were when the Rulekeepor pointed out that a Proposal had not worked as intended. Greetings, Ørjan. -- Trigon
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
Alright, fair enough. I stand corrected. We may want to clean up our nomenclature here at some point. -Aris On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:30 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:21 -0800, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Strictly speaking, you can CoE any document (R2201). However, the > > message I sent wasn't even a document, given that it was sent to a-d. > > Rule 1551 defines a public document to be part (possibly all) of a > public message. It also strongly implies that a public document is a > type of document, although without defining "document". That weakly > implies that a document is part, and possibly all, of a message. If so, > messages to a-d probably count, otherwise the "public" modifier would > be pointless. > > Other uses of "document" in the rule include "backing documents" > (something quite different), and Canti Cygnei (similar to the usage in > rule 1551, but which could be submitted via private email to the > Registrar, and are thus not necessarily public). There's also the usage > in rule 2124, which is just weird. > > -- > ais523 >
Re: DIS: Interest Poll: Rulekeepor's Notes
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's an old tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think it would be useful. If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you would like me to include. As I recall, the most interesting information in those were when the Rulekeepor pointed out that a Proposal had not worked as intended. Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:21 -0800, Aris Merchant wrote: > Strictly speaking, you can CoE any document (R2201). However, the > message I sent wasn't even a document, given that it was sent to a-d. Rule 1551 defines a public document to be part (possibly all) of a public message. It also strongly implies that a public document is a type of document, although without defining "document". That weakly implies that a document is part, and possibly all, of a message. If so, messages to a-d probably count, otherwise the "public" modifier would be pointless. Other uses of "document" in the rule include "backing documents" (something quite different), and Canti Cygnei (similar to the usage in rule 1551, but which could be submitted via private email to the Registrar, and are thus not necessarily public). There's also the usage in rule 2124, which is just weird. -- ais523
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
Strictly speaking, you can CoE any document (R2201). However, the message I sent wasn't even a document, given that it was sent to a-d. -Aris On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:32 AM Reuben Staley wrote: > > Just so you know, Claims of Error only work on actual reports. This is not > a report, just a quick question about the accuracy of the list. You might > have already known that, but I just wanted to make sure. > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 11:13 Gaelan Steele > > CoE: there was a typo fix proposal in one of my recent vote emails. I’ll > > try and find it in few. > > > > Gaelan > > > > > On Nov 11, 2018, at 12:55 AM, Aris Merchant < > > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let > > > me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you! > > > > > > IDAuthor(s) AITitle > > > > > --- > > > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence > > > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed > > > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing > > > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs > > > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards > > > 8128 Trigon 1.0 Happy Birthday To You > > > 8129 twg 2.0 [1] > > > > > > [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > > > > > > -Aris > > > >
DIS: Interest Poll: Rulekeepor's Notes
Would anyone like me to start publishing Rulekeepor's notes? It's an old tradition but I'm not going to do it if people don't think it would be useful. If you *do* want me to publish them, tell me what information you would like me to include. Here are a few examples from various Rulekeepors to help you all decide: ALEXIS, LATE 2017: https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08651.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08688.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg08706.html G., MID 2015: https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07539.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07613.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07656.html OMD, LATE 2014: https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07427.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07456.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07458.html WOGGLE, MID 2013: https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg06926.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07017.html https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07084.html -- Trigon
DIS: Re: BUS: SPOOKY package theft
My reading of the rules suggests that the auction ends (and the lots can be given) without anyone announcing its end. (The announcer SHALL announce the end, but nothing else depend on it.) Gaelan > On Nov 11, 2018, at 6:07 PM, D. Margaux wrote: > > Lol! Good bye, Nichdel. I appreciate your faithful zombie service. > > I think Gaelan’s actions are all effective, but I’m not sure the scam works > unless Nichdel comes back and announces the end of the auction. I don’t think > anyone can announce the auction results except Nichdel. > > I intend with notice to flip Nichdel’s master switch back to agora. > >> On Nov 11, 2018, at 8:14 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: >> >> I perform the following series of actions if and only if all of them are >> EFFECTIVE. >> >> I transfer 5 coins to nichdel. >> >> I act on D. Margaux’s behalf to act on nichdel’s behalf to create an auction >> with the following attributes: >> One lot, containing 10 coins >> Announcer: nichdel >> Auctioneer: nichdel >> Minimum bid: 1 Nothing >> Currency: Nothings (from the contract I created) >> >> I act on D. Margaux’s behalf to act on nichdel's behalf to transfer all of >> eir assets to myself. >> >> I act on D. Margaux’s behalf to act on nichdel’s behalf to flip eir Master >> switch to emselves. >> >> I award nichdel a welcome package. >> >> I create a Nothing in my possession. >> >> I bid 1 nothing in the above auction. >> >> Gaelan
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Dummy contract
Could you make a public statement that your scam won’t hurt the person who
joins the contract (more than anyone else, that is)?
-Aris
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 4:20 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Fair warning: I’m actually only 50% sure it will work.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Nov 11, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> >
> > I have to say, I'm really, really curious what it is you have up your
> sleeve...
> >
> > -twg
> >
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > On Monday, November 12, 2018 12:11 AM, Gaelan Steele
> wrote:
> >
> >> The quoted offer is void. New version with the actual text so that
> people know it’s not dangerous:
> >>
> >> I agree to be bound by the following contract with one other player
> (after that player agrees, I do not agree to further copies): {
> >> A party to this contract CAN, one time only, act on Gaelan’s behalf to
> transfer 3 coins to emselves.
> >> Nothings are a currency. Gaelan CAN create Nothings in his possession
> by announcement.
> >> }
> >>
> >>> On Nov 11, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote:
> >>> I need a contract for a thing.
> >>> I agree to be bound by the following contract with one other player
> (after that player agrees, I do not agree to further copies):
> >>> {
> >>> A party to this contract CAN, one time only, act on Gaelan’s behalf to
> transfer 3 coins to emselves.
> >>> Gaelan CAN amend this contract by announcement, as long as the
> amendment does not remove or modify these first two paragraphs, introduce
> any further obligations on parties to this contract other than Gaelan,
> allow acting on behalf of parties to this contract other than Gaelan, or
> allow amendments to this contract through a mechanism other than this one.
> >>> }
> >>> Gaelan
> >
> >
>
>
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Dummy contract
Fair warning: I’m actually only 50% sure it will work.
Gaelan
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> I have to say, I'm really, really curious what it is you have up your
> sleeve...
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Monday, November 12, 2018 12:11 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
>> The quoted offer is void. New version with the actual text so that people
>> know it’s not dangerous:
>>
>> I agree to be bound by the following contract with one other player (after
>> that player agrees, I do not agree to further copies): {
>> A party to this contract CAN, one time only, act on Gaelan’s behalf to
>> transfer 3 coins to emselves.
>> Nothings are a currency. Gaelan CAN create Nothings in his possession by
>> announcement.
>> }
>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote:
>>> I need a contract for a thing.
>>> I agree to be bound by the following contract with one other player (after
>>> that player agrees, I do not agree to further copies):
>>> {
>>> A party to this contract CAN, one time only, act on Gaelan’s behalf to
>>> transfer 3 coins to emselves.
>>> Gaelan CAN amend this contract by announcement, as long as the amendment
>>> does not remove or modify these first two paragraphs, introduce any further
>>> obligations on parties to this contract other than Gaelan, allow acting on
>>> behalf of parties to this contract other than Gaelan, or allow amendments
>>> to this contract through a mechanism other than this one.
>>> }
>>> Gaelan
>
>
DIS: Re: BUS: Dummy contract
I have to say, I'm really, really curious what it is you have up your sleeve...
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, November 12, 2018 12:11 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> The quoted offer is void. New version with the actual text so that people
> know it’s not dangerous:
>
> I agree to be bound by the following contract with one other player (after
> that player agrees, I do not agree to further copies): {
> A party to this contract CAN, one time only, act on Gaelan’s behalf to
> transfer 3 coins to emselves.
> Nothings are a currency. Gaelan CAN create Nothings in his possession by
> announcement.
> }
>
> > On Nov 11, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Gaelan Steele g...@canishe.com wrote:
> > I need a contract for a thing.
> > I agree to be bound by the following contract with one other player (after
> > that player agrees, I do not agree to further copies):
> > {
> > A party to this contract CAN, one time only, act on Gaelan’s behalf to
> > transfer 3 coins to emselves.
> > Gaelan CAN amend this contract by announcement, as long as the amendment
> > does not remove or modify these first two paragraphs, introduce any further
> > obligations on parties to this contract other than Gaelan, allow acting on
> > behalf of parties to this contract other than Gaelan, or allow amendments
> > to this contract through a mechanism other than this one.
> > }
> > Gaelan
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Weekly report: Forbes 500
These are CoEs, not CFJs :) -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, November 11, 2018 7:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > (Or, since D. Margaux also re-raised the issue and assigned a new > case, these could be withdrawn). > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I favor these. > > My apologies, I wrote 3/4 of the judgement in question but then real life > > clobbered me this past week - if I'm assigned I can judge these within > > 1-2 days of assignment. > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > > > I CoE this report: "D. Margaux did not judge CFJ 3672, so e possesses > > > only 636 coins." > > > I CoE this report: "Trigon did not judge CFJ 3672, so e possesses only 35 > > > coins." > > > In response to both these CoEs, I cite CFJ 3681. > > > Notice of Honour: > > > -1 G. (not having properly judged CFJ 3681 yet) > > > +1 天火狐 (being an obedient zombie) > > > -twg > > > Original Message > > > On Sunday, November 11, 2018 4:49 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Date of this weekly report: 2018-11-11 > > > > Date of last weekly report: 2018-10-30 > > > > [Hopefully this is the last time I rearrange the report layout for a > > > > while! I'm fairly satisfied with it now.] > > > > ASSET INDEX > > > > === > > > > This section does not self-ratify. > > > > Asset class Recordkeepor > > > > Coins Treasuror (twg) > > > > Blots Referee (twg) > > > > COIN BALANCES > > > > = > > > > This section does not self-ratify due to a bug. See Proposal . > > > > Coins Active players > > > > > > > > 17ATMunn > > > > 33Aris > > > >6Corona > > > > 14CuddleBeam > > > > 641D. Margaux > > > > 426G. > > > > 14Gaelan > > > > 15Hālian > > > > 15L. > > > > 24Murphy > > > > 16omd > > > > 13Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > 15Tarhalindur > > > > 40Trigon > > > > 65twg > > > > > > > > > > > > Coins Zombies > > > > > > > >5nichdel > > > >0pokes > > > >5Telnaior > > > >0天火狐 > > > > 19V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > > > Coins Non-player entities > > > > > > > > 1135Agora > > > > 12Lost and Found Department > > > > > > > > > > > > RECENT HISTORY > > > > = > > > > This section is purely informational and does not self-ratify. > > > > Entity Change Time (UTC) Reason > > > > > > > > D. Margaux + 5c. 2018-11-10 20:05 Judged CFJ 3686 > > > > D. Margaux + 5c. 2018-11-10 20:05 Judged CFJ 3685 > > > > G. + 9c. 2018-11-06 00:10 Transfer from pokes > > > > pokes - 9c. 2018-11-06 00:10 Transfer to G. > > > > twg + 8c. 2018-11-05 21:01 Transfer from 天火狐 > > > > 天火狐 - 8c. 2018-11-05 21:01 Transfer to twg > > > > Agora + 13c. 2018-11-05 20:55 Zombie auction (天火狐) > > > > twg - 13c. 2018-11-05 20:55 Zombie auction (天火狐) > > > > Agora + 25c. 2018-11-05 15:12 Zombie auction (pokes) > > > > G. - 25c. 2018-11-05 15:12 Zombie auction (pokes) > > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-11-03 07:22 Judged CFJ 3684 > > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-11-03 07:22 Judged CFJ 3683 > > > > G. + 5c. 2018-11-02 17:45 Judged CFJ 3680 > > > > G. + 5c. 2018-11-02 17:45 Judged CFJ 3679 > > > > twg + 5c. 2018-11-01 13:56 Judged CFJ 3677 > > > > V.J. Rada + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > twg + 25c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Assessor etc.) > > > > Trigon + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Rulekeepor) > > > > 天火狐 + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Telnaior + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Tarhalindur + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > P.S.S. + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > pokes + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > omd + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Distributor) > > > > nichdel + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Murphy + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (ADoP) > > > > L + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Hālian + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Gaelan + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > G. + 15c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Herald, Registrar) > > > > D. Margaux + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Referee) > > > > CuddleBeam + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Corona + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Aris + 15c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Promotor, P.M.) > > > > ATMunn + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > > Tarhalindur + 10c. 2018-10-31 20:23 Welcome Package > > > > twg + 1c. 2018-10-31 16:32 Transfer from Gaelan > > > > Gaelan - 1c. 2018-10-31 16:32 Transfer to twg > > > > -- time of last report -- > > > > G. + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:57 Judged CFJ 3681 > > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:38 Judged CFJ 3673 > > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:38 Judged CFJ 3672 > > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:38 Judged CFJ 3671 > > > > Tri
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Treasuror] Weekly report: Forbes 500
(Or, since D. Margaux also re-raised the issue and assigned a new case, these could be withdrawn). On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I favor these. > > My apologies, I wrote 3/4 of the judgement in question but then real life > clobbered me this past week - if I'm assigned I can judge these within > 1-2 days of assignment. > > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > > I CoE this report: "D. Margaux did not judge CFJ 3672, so e possesses only > > 636 coins." > > I CoE this report: "Trigon did not judge CFJ 3672, so e possesses only 35 > > coins." > > In response to both these CoEs, I cite CFJ 3681. > > > > Notice of Honour: > > -1 G. (not having properly judged CFJ 3681 yet) > > +1 天火狐 (being an obedient zombie) > > > > -twg > > > > > > �\�\�\�\�\�\�\ Original Message �\�\�\�\�\�\�\ > > On Sunday, November 11, 2018 4:49 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey > > wrote: > > > > > Date of this weekly report: 2018-11-11 > > > Date of last weekly report: 2018-10-30 > > > > > > [Hopefully this is the last time I rearrange the report layout for a > > > while! I'm fairly satisfied with it now.] > > > > > > ASSET INDEX > > > > > > === > > > > > > This section does not self-ratify. > > > > > > Asset class Recordkeepor > > > > > > Coins Treasuror (twg) > > > Blots Referee (twg) > > > > > > COIN BALANCES > > > > > > = > > > > > > This section does not self-ratify due to a bug. See Proposal . > > > > > > Coins Active players > > > > > > 17ATMunn > > > 33Aris > > >6Corona > > > 14CuddleBeam > > > 641D. Margaux > > > 426G. > > > 14Gaelan > > > 15Hālian > > > 15L. > > > 24Murphy > > > 16omd > > > 13Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > 15Tarhalindur > > > 40Trigon > > > 65twg > > > > > > > > > Coins Zombies > > > > > >5nichdel > > >0pokes > > >5Telnaior > > >0天火狐 > > > 19V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > Coins Non-player entities > > > > > > 1135Agora > > > 12Lost and Found Department > > > > > > > > > RECENT HISTORY > > > > > > = > > > > > > This section is purely informational and does not self-ratify. > > > > > > Entity Change Time (UTC) Reason > > > > > > > > > > > > D. Margaux + 5c. 2018-11-10 20:05 Judged CFJ 3686 > > > D. Margaux + 5c. 2018-11-10 20:05 Judged CFJ 3685 > > > G. + 9c. 2018-11-06 00:10 Transfer from pokes > > > pokes - 9c. 2018-11-06 00:10 Transfer to G. > > > twg + 8c. 2018-11-05 21:01 Transfer from 天火狐 > > > 天火狐 - 8c. 2018-11-05 21:01 Transfer to twg > > > Agora + 13c. 2018-11-05 20:55 Zombie auction (天火狐) > > > twg - 13c. 2018-11-05 20:55 Zombie auction (天火狐) > > > Agora + 25c. 2018-11-05 15:12 Zombie auction (pokes) > > > G. - 25c. 2018-11-05 15:12 Zombie auction (pokes) > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-11-03 07:22 Judged CFJ 3684 > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-11-03 07:22 Judged CFJ 3683 > > > G. + 5c. 2018-11-02 17:45 Judged CFJ 3680 > > > G. + 5c. 2018-11-02 17:45 Judged CFJ 3679 > > > twg + 5c. 2018-11-01 13:56 Judged CFJ 3677 > > > V.J. Rada + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > twg + 25c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Assessor etc.) > > > Trigon + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Rulekeepor) > > > 天火狐 + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Telnaior + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Tarhalindur + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > P.S.S. + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > pokes + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > omd + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Distributor) > > > nichdel + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Murphy + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (ADoP) > > > L + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Hālian + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Gaelan + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > G. + 15c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Herald, Registrar) > > > D. Margaux + 10c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Referee) > > > CuddleBeam + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Corona + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Aris + 15c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday (Promotor, P.M.) > > > ATMunn + 5c. 2018-11-01 00:00 Payday > > > Tarhalindur + 10c. 2018-10-31 20:23 Welcome Package > > > twg + 1c. 2018-10-31 16:32 Transfer from Gaelan > > > Gaelan - 1c. 2018-10-31 16:32 Transfer to twg > > > -- time of last report -- > > > G. + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:57 Judged CFJ 3681 > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:38 Judged CFJ 3673 > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:38 Judged CFJ 3672 > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 01:38 Judged CFJ 3671 > > > Trigon + 5c. 2018-10-30 00:05 Judged CFJ 3670 > > > D. Margaux + 5c. 2018-10-29 14:11 Judged CFJ 3672 > > > D. Margaux + 5c. 2018-10-27 19:4
DIS: Re: BUS: Elections
I become a candidate for Rulekeepor. On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 11:34 Timon Walshe-Grey I become a candidate for Referee. > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Sunday, November 11, 2018 6:15 PM, Edward Murphy > wrote: > > > I initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the Prime Minister > > election. > > > > - Vote Collector is ADoP > > - Valid options are ATMunn, D. Margaux, G., Murphy > > - Voting method is instant runoff > > > > In the above election, I vote for Me. > > > > I initiate elections for: > > > > - Arbitor (held interim by D. Margaux since Oct 20) > > - Referee (held interim by twg since Nov 1) > > - Registrar (held interim by G. since Nov 5) > > - Rulekeepor (held interim by Trigon since Oct 14) > > >
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
Just so you know, Claims of Error only work on actual reports. This is not a report, just a quick question about the accuracy of the list. You might have already known that, but I just wanted to make sure. On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 11:13 Gaelan Steele CoE: there was a typo fix proposal in one of my recent vote emails. I’ll > try and find it in few. > > Gaelan > > > On Nov 11, 2018, at 12:55 AM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let > > me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you! > > > > IDAuthor(s) AITitle > > > --- > > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence > > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed > > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing > > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs > > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards > > 8128 Trigon 1.0 Happy Birthday To You > > 8129 twg 2.0 [1] > > > > [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > > > > -Aris > >
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
CoE: there was a typo fix proposal in one of my recent vote emails. I’ll try and find it in few. Gaelan > On Nov 11, 2018, at 12:55 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let > me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you! > > IDAuthor(s) AITitle > --- > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards > 8128 Trigon 1.0 Happy Birthday To You > 8129 twg 2.0 [1] > > [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > > -Aris
Re: DIS: SCAM ALERT (was Re: BUS: Contract Hash)
twg wrote: Normally when someone seems suspiciously anxious to have something happen at a certain time, I expect it to be intended to help em qualify for a transparent ribbon. But I don't see any way for this proposal to inadvertently grant Gaelan one ribbon, never mind five. It might work if e could somehow start an auction with Agora as Auctioneer and lots of eir own choice, but the proposed rule pretty clearly forbids that. 'Lots of eir own choice' seems possible, but ultimately ineffective due to Rule 2549: "An Auction also CANNOT be initiated unless the Auctioneer is able to give away each item in each of the Auction's lots."
Re: DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
Also, you are missing "Bugfix: Treasuror doesn't self-ratify v2": https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32959.html -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, November 11, 2018 8:55 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let > me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you! > > ID Author(s) AI Title > > > > 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence > 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed > 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing > 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs > 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards > 8128 Trigon 1.0 Happy Birthday To You > 8129 twg 2.0 [1] > > [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies > > -Aris
DIS: [Promotor] Index Proposalorum
Here's my draft list of proposals. If I'm missing anything, please let me know. Also, all ID numbers are provisional. Thank you! IDAuthor(s) AITitle --- 8123 Gaelan 3.0 Independence 8124 Trigon 1.0 Only proposals should be distributed 8125 Trigon 3.0 Time periods are confusing 8126 Trigon 3.0 High-level asset verbs 8127 Trigon 2.0 Reinstituting Rewards 8128 Trigon 1.0 Happy Birthday To You 8129 twg 2.0 [1] [1] With not very much responsibility comes fewer shinies -Aris
