DIS: Re: BUS: Victory by Apathy

2019-02-19 Thread Cuddle Beam
On a side-note, if capitalization no longer denotes terms of art and should be interpreted literally, I got to go look for a real-life banner to raise some time in the future... On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 08:20, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >Capitalization is generally inconsequential and should not be

DIS: Re: BUS: Victory by Apathy

2019-02-19 Thread Cuddle Beam
>Capitalization is generally inconsequential and should not be used to infer that it's a term of art I disagree. And my counterargument is going to make me sip a lot of air through my teeth because I don’t like it. The capitalization thing is an Agoran slang/tradition/cultural thing (yuck,

DIS: Re: BUS: Victory by Apathy

2019-02-19 Thread James Cook
On Tue., Feb. 19, 2019, 23:12 ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk < ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 03:56 +, James Cook wrote: > > Apathy. I specify Falsifian and G. > > > > I initiate a Call for Judgement, specifying the statement: "Falsifian > > and G won the game." > > > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Apathy

2019-02-19 Thread Reuben Staley
Support On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, 20:56 James Cook Apathy >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] vote for the best Ruleset find

2019-02-19 Thread Telnaior
Are we allowed to make conditional votes? If so, and Gaelan either does not vote or votes PRESENT, then I vote PRESENT. If so, and Gaelan casts any other vote, then I vote {Telnaior, Gaelan, Cuddlebeam, twg}. If conditional votes are not allowed, then I vote {Telnaior, Gaelan, Cuddlebeam,

Re: DIS: Relics

2019-02-19 Thread Cuddle Beam
>getting to 3 when starting <3 cute, I <3 you too. Anyways, I was thinking about the Greed Relic and how to make it way less vulnerable to dishonesty. Instead of attending to the result of a scam's method (someone reporting that a non-consensual event happened) , we could just look at the method

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] vote for the best Ruleset find

2019-02-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
I vote as follows: (Telnaior, Gaelan, CuddleBeam, twg). Total coincidence that this was the order I listed the options lol Reasons: Quite tough to choose between Telnaior and Gaelan. Both very good. Telnaior takes several rules (Rewards, Assets, Reports and Duties) and links parts of them -

Re: DIS: Relics

2019-02-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
Well I did think about noting you could have as many relic levels as you wanted, but I figured the mark "escalation" scam worth a Relic would be just "getting to 3 when starting <3". In terms of "levels of victory" I kinda feel like there's "some power" versus "complete power", not a huge

Re: DIS: Relics

2019-02-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 2/19/2019 5:36 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: I'm piggybacking off the existing Ribbon rules. Maybe there's a more elegant way to do it. What do you guys think? I think it's fine and elegant to use existing stuff, but the rule is pretty long already - I'd split it into three rules: Rule 1:

Re: DIS: Relics

2019-02-19 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 07:39 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I'm not sure if you'd have a different relic for all 3 steps (power- > 1, power-3, and power-1 to power-3), that might be a bit much, but > distinguishing different dictatorship levels gives you some options. I'm vaguely amused that you

Re: DIS: Relics

2019-02-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 2/19/2019 5:36 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > Also, I have no idea what an escalation scam is, someone please fill me in > on that lol. An escalation scam is a sub-type of Dictator scam, really. A Dictator power-1 scam would be a scam that gives you complete control over an instrument of power-1

DIS: Relics

2019-02-19 Thread Cuddle Beam
I'm piggybacking off the existing Ribbon rules. Maybe there's a more elegant way to do it. What do you guys think? I'm not super happy with Greed Relic as it is but I like the idea of scams that break consent. It just seems too easy to earn (an accomplice just pretends that the transfer was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not so fast!

2019-02-19 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Already on my radar! -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 1:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On 2/18/2019 5:18 PM, D. Margaux wrote: > > > This is such a mess lol. > > Patent title suggestion for everyone involved in the mess: > "Badge of the Best Intents". > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Deputisation for PM CFJs

2019-02-19 Thread D. Margaux
In that case, you have a few options— 1) judge them FALSE/FALSE (which is their current truth values) 2) wait to see if the intent fixing proposal passes (if you think any intent will be fixed retroactively and want the judgement to reflect that) > On Feb 19, 2019, at 2:49 AM, Aris Merchant >