> I think all the R105 requirements are satisfied by publishing the rule that
> contains the change, i.e. it's if there was an SLR published in the 4-60 day
> time window beforehand.
Oh, that's interesting. Let me check my understanding...
R105 says the full text of the rule change, and the
Thanks, I'll try that. Though in this case I didn't even find it in spam.
On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I also received the original message (via an enterprise gmail if it
> matters).
>
> Note a couple months ago when I migrated to gmail I had to explicitly
> whitelist
Neither did I, and I have such a filter.
-Aris
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:00 PM James Cook wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try that. Though in this case I didn't even find it in spam.
>
>
> On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 16:36, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > I also received the original message (via an
I also received the original message (via an enterprise gmail if it
matters).
Note a couple months ago when I migrated to gmail I had to explicitly
whitelist everything with to:agoranomic.org because some people kept ending
up in spam (can't remember if Murphy was one of them).
On 5/10/2019
> Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought Comptrollor was
> imposed, but not 100% sure.
Yes, Comptrollor is imposed. I sent a message about it at 04:24 UTC.
As on the previous occasion, I got the original message.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 11 May 2019, D. Margaux wrote:
Below is Murphy’s message from the website, which somehow hasn’t come through.
I declare candidacy for Assessor.
Can you have an election for imposed offices? I thought
6 matches
Mail list logo
