On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 22:20, Bernie Brackett wrote:
> it feels like there's a discussion going on involving what exactly single
> transferable vote means, so I feel like I should bring up that Score Voting
> has mathematically been proven to be better. Is there any reason not to
> switch to it?
Thank you for pointing that out. It is through the due diligence of the
players of Agora Nomic that what I report is even remotely accurate.
On Sat, May 25, 2019, 15:52 omd wrote:
> Just a quick note -
> The FLR credits Proposal 7778 (in various places) as:
> Amended(21) by P7778
it feels like there's a discussion going on involving what exactly single
transferable vote means, so I feel like I should bring up that Score Voting
has mathematically been proven to be better. Is there any reason not to
switch to it?
Just a quick note -
The FLR credits Proposal 7778 (in various places) as:
Amended(21) by P7778 'Instant Runoff Improved' (Alexis), 14 Aug 2014
But in fact I submitted it:
And it was actually adopted on
On Sat, 2019-05-25 at 21:24 +, James Cook wrote:
> I couldn't resist making my own attempt. It's a lot wordier than
> yours, unfortunately, but it addresses these points and omd's first
> point. Maybe there's some middle ground that's less wordy.
> 2. For an instant runoff decision, the
> I intend to propose the following change to rule 955, in place of the current
> definition of IRV:
> > The outcome of an Instant Runoff decision is:
> > a. If a single option has the absolute majority of valid ballots specifying
> > it as the first entry on the list, then the outcome is
Mail list logo