Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-04 Thread Aris Merchant
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:46 PM James Cook wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 20:22, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > wrote: > > Translated to English, this states that the email should not be > > considered valid if the Subject fail was modified in transit. Of > > course, the Subject of the email

Re: DIS: DMARC bounces (attn Murphy)

2019-06-04 Thread James Cook
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 20:22, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > Translated to English, this states that the email should not be > considered valid if the Subject fail was modified in transit. Of > course, the Subject of the email actually was modified (by the list > software, inserting the BAK:),

Re: DIS: [Referee] Ritual Finger Pointing Proto-Decision

2019-06-04 Thread Rebecca
it's to be found in rule 217. On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 1:25 PM James Cook wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 05:49, Rebecca wrote: > > I suspect that the text is > > not clear and therefore the four-part test must be applied. > > What's the four-part test? > -- >From V.J. Rada

DIS: (Attn omd) mailman.agoranomic.org HTTPS certificate error

2019-06-04 Thread James Cook
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 06:06, omd wrote: > Sorry about this! Despite the "Attn omd" in the subject, my eyes saw > the "DIS:" and jumped over the rest; I was putting off reading Agora > list messages so I didn't see it until now. (Even though you also > added me directly as a recipient, Gmail

Re: DIS: [Referee] Ritual Finger Pointing Proto-Decision

2019-06-04 Thread James Cook
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 05:49, Rebecca wrote: > I suspect that the text is > not clear and therefore the four-part test must be applied. What's the four-part test?

Re: DIS: On Cleanliness

2019-06-04 Thread Reuben Staley
I could have sworn we had a clause that prevented the cleaning from affecting the interpretation of the rule at some point. Regardless, omd is right. This may be covered already. Additionally, since it is without objection, any issues this may cause would (hopefully) be seen in advance by the

Re: DIS: On Cleanliness

2019-06-04 Thread omd
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:36 AM Jason Cobb wrote: > Given that Rule 2221 ("Cleanliness") permits correcting the > capitalization of a rule, would that, for example, permit changing a > rule from saying "shall" to "SHALL" (or vice versa)? > > Note: I'm not planning anything, the question just

Re: DIS: Plot twist: new proto-judgements of CFJs 3726 and 3727

2019-06-04 Thread Charles Walker
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 03:27, James Cook wrote: > Having established that, here is the hypothetical timeline: > > * D. Margaux publishes correct Astronomor and Clork reports. > * omd Points eir Finger at D. Margaux for publishing inaccurate > information in those reports. > * D. Margaux

Re: DIS: [Referee] Ritual Finger Pointing Proto-Decision

2019-06-04 Thread D Margaux
From the beginning, this issue was always going to become a CFJ. I’m not an interested party in the outcome, in the sense that the decision doesn’t give me any particular benefit in the game. And the caller of the CFJ isn’t appealing my reasoning, but instead agrees with it. I did give my

Re: DIS: [Referee] Ritual Finger Pointing Proto-Decision

2019-06-04 Thread Aris Merchant
I’m not sure how I feel about assigning you an appeal against your own reasoning. I generally intend to respect the favoring of cases, but I'm not sure that it's appropriate in this instance. -Aris On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM D. Margaux wrote: > I favour this CFJ > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at

Re: DIS: [Referee] Ritual Finger Pointing Proto-Decision

2019-06-04 Thread D. Margaux
I favour this CFJ On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:49 AM Rebecca wrote: > This is an interesting case. Although I believe that the best reading of > the rule holds all players liable, I call for judgement on the following > question, barring Aris > {If no player activates Rule 2596 'The Ritual' in a

DIS: On Cleanliness

2019-06-04 Thread Jason Cobb
Given that Rule 2221 ("Cleanliness") permits correcting the capitalization of a rule, would that, for example, permit changing a rule from saying "shall" to "SHALL" (or vice versa)? Note: I'm not planning anything, the question just crossed my mind. -- Jason Cobb

DIS: Apologies

2019-06-04 Thread ATMunn
Sorry for my lack of participation in recent events. Here's why in a nutshell: recent events -- -- -- -- - my - head | | / \

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Temporary Deputy-ADoP] Initiation of Election for Prime Minister

2019-06-04 Thread Charles Walker
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 02:09, Kerim Aydin wrote: > [Also: good to see you in the game again Walker, and welcome Jason Cobb!] Thanks G., and good to see you're still around! -- Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 3644 judged TRUE

2019-06-04 Thread Rebecca
Never mind, this was really 36_6_4. On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:22 PM Rebecca wrote: > Okay, there are two CFJ 3644s. This one and the one regarding Humiliating > Public Reminders (which appears as an Annotation in the FLR). Was this > resolved? > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:24 PM Timon

Re: DIS: Fake Zombies

2019-06-04 Thread omd
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:15 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > As a person, you possess one and exactly one Citizenship switch. Sending > messages from fake emails stating intent to register when you already > have registered would not change the value of your personal Citizenship > switch. For some fun

Re: DIS: [Referee] Ritual Finger Pointing Proto-Decision

2019-06-04 Thread omd
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:21 PM Rebecca wrote: > > We do interestingly have a clause that says "The Rules SHALL NOT be > interpreted > so as to proscribe unregulated actions.". I suppose under my > interpretation, anyone who so interprets the rules in any circumstance will > be criminally liable,

Re: DIS: (Attn omd) mailman.agoranomic.org HTTPS certificate error

2019-06-04 Thread omd
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 6:54 PM James Cook wrote: > When I try to load https://mailman.agoranomic.org/, I see a certificate error: Sorry about this! Despite the "Attn omd" in the subject, my eyes saw the "DIS:" and jumped over the rest; I was putting off reading Agora list messages so I didn't