On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:43 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 13:01 Alexis Hunt, wrote:
>
> > On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> >>
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 13:01 Alexis Hunt, wrote:
> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote:
>
>> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
>> agora-discussion, wrote:
>>
>>> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions:
>>>
>>> 1. In "any player CAN
On 3/16/20 7:48 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
> it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research effort.
> I think that to be eligible for a degree, a thesis should show more
> analysis or research
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 20:08, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion wrote:
> I'll weigh in to say that while Aris's thesis isn't a spectacular work
> of historical scholarship, e doesn't purport otherwise. I think that
> as it is, it should be considered for an A.N.
Personally, my
you should vote on behalf of em to vote as I voted, so I get a vote
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:04 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> More positivity: On behalf of o, I vote FOR every decision to adopt a
> proposal that is currently in its voting
I'll weigh in to say that while Aris's thesis isn't a spectacular work
of historical scholarship, e doesn't purport otherwise. I think that
as it is, it should be considered for an A.N.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:01 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
On 3/16/2020 5:00 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:49 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
>> it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research effort.
>> I
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:49 PM Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
> it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research effort.
> I think that to be eligible for a degree, a thesis should show more
>
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 19:48 -0400, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
> it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research
> effort.
> I think that to be eligible for a degree, a thesis should show more
>
On 3/16/2020 4:48 PM, Tanner Swett via agora-discussion wrote:
> Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
> it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research effort.
> I think that to be eligible for a degree, a thesis should show more
> analysis or
Respectfully, although Aris's thesis is interesting and well-written,
it doesn't seem to show a great amount of analysis or research effort.
I think that to be eligible for a degree, a thesis should show more
analysis or research than, say, a typical CFJ judgement.
Speaking of which, I think at
I've voted in the ongoing votes on proposals only (starting with "CFJ
setup") which i am now not eligible to vote on because I became a player
after the voting period started
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:53 AM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Except for
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 18:28, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I very much like this idea! I request that interpretations not be
> installed, at least in the first version, since those are
> controversial.
>
> Also, to clarify, would this include allowing other persons to act on
>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:57 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Now that it looks like the statute reform proposal is going to squeak
> through, I started thinking about where we might first want to create
> non-statute bodies of law. Contracts are the natural choice, but on
>
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 12:46 Alexis Hunt, wrote:
> On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion, wrote:
>
>> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions:
>>
>> 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency
>> Regulations and
Except for the last one in which e doesn't appear to have voted.
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 09:03 Jason Cobb via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/16/20 8:52 AM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> > On 3/16/20 12:56 AM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
> >> -1 Falsifian for self
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:12 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion, wrote:
> This makes a lot of sense. I really like the situation with the Prime
> Minister and Agoran consent of officeholders because it improves the
> nature of the cabinet, but I think we will need to include a
On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:06 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
agora-discussion, wrote:
> I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions:
>
> 1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency
> Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal
> itself?
>
On 3/15/2020 9:56 PM, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
> -1 Falsifian for self ratifying that I am not a player, three times.
> +1 Aris because hes epic
>
> The CFJ I judged was never judged, G has to reassign that
> None of my votes count
>
I assigned the CFJ before it self-ratified.
On 3/16/20 12:53 AM, Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion wrote:
> For Heraldic purposes, I would like to request if anyone can provide
> me with machine-readable assessment information for a large number of
> historical proposals, especially current and former Assessors. In
> particular, I'd like to
This makes a lot of sense. I really like the situation with the Prime
Minister and Agoran consent of officeholders because it improves the
nature of the cabinet, but I think we will need to include a safeguard
against concentration of offices and create some structure for waiting
people's support
I like the general idea, but I have a couple questions:
1. In "any player CAN cause this rule to repeal all Emergency
Regulations and then itself." Why do we want the rule to repeal
itself?
2. Should "notwithstanding any rule that would prohibit a single
player from holding both offices." read
oops sorry
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:00 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 00:56, Rebecca via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > -1 Falsifian for self ratifying that I am not a player, three times.
> > +1 Aris because hes epic
> >
23 matches
Mail list logo
