Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (@Promotor) No Taxation Without Representation

2024-02-15 Thread 4st nomic via agora-discussion
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 9:44 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 2/15/24 12:41, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > { > > Title: No Taxation Without Representation > > Adoption Index: 2.0 > > Author: 4st > >

DIS: Re: BUS: (@Promotor) No Taxation Without Representation

2024-02-15 Thread Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 2/15/24 12:41, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > { > Title: No Taxation Without Representation > Adoption Index: 2.0 > Author: 4st > Co-author(s): > > [Currently, democratic proposals can pass even if the quorum is much lower > than the number of active

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9058-9061

2024-02-15 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 2/15/24 09:48, nix via agora-business wrote: >> 9059~ Maloney 1.0 Ambiguity Amendment > AGAINST; Aris' seems to fix the problem in a more clear way, IMO. I > think there's a lot of potential debate over "alter the function". > >> 9060~ Maloney 1.0

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 9053-9057 [attn. Arbitor]

2024-02-15 Thread Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 2/14/24 20:16, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > Counterarguments/Gratuitous arguments TRUE: >> 1. Does text specify a rule change? >> 2. If so, is it unambiguous what the text of the rule to be enacted is? >> As to 1, the text makes no mention of a "rule", only "enact[ing]" >> something.