Ah. Then yes, I'd definitely refile the case.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, 10:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/18/24 01:14, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 3/17/24 22:14, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> What evidence do you
On 3/18/24 01:14, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/17/24 22:14, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
>> What evidence do you have that rule numbers and Id numbers are the same?
>> Because arguing that this case is false has definitive disastrous effects,
>> so is there another way to
On 3/17/24 22:14, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> What evidence do you have that rule numbers and Id numbers are the same?
> Because arguing that this case is false has definitive disastrous effects,
> so is there another way to judge this case outside of those two options?
The earliest
I proto-submit the following proposal: {
Title: Officially Official (and Backuply Backup)
Authors: Gaelan
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled “Forum Purposes”, with the following
text: {
Purpose is a public forum switch, with values Business (default),
Official, and Backup.
What evidence do you have that rule numbers and Id numbers are the same?
Because arguing that this case is false has definitive disastrous effects,
so is there another way to judge this case outside of those two options?
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024, 6:52 PM Aris via agora-business <
On 3/17/24 20:19, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> - Snail’s dictatorship rule “Public Speaking” had at least power 3.
> - Proposal 23n’t was adopted. (messages 324)
> - The proposal was correctly distributed, despite “23n’t” allegedly not
> being
> a valid ID
> On Mar 16, 2024, at 5:38 PM, nix via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> I assign CFJ 4056 to Gaelan.
Some preliminary thoughts; arguments on any of these points (or any points I
missed) are welcome.
The argument for TRUE is, broadly, that message 327 created a power-4.9 rule
(“SILENCE”) which
Jackrabbit.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:52 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/17/24 19:25, Jackrabbit via agora-business wrote:
> > I register, grant myself a welcome package, and envision my dream as
> wealth.
>
>
> Welcome! Under what name do you wish
Janet wrote:
... Okay, so it turns out I can't read and "denial" isn't by
announcement (I could have sworn it was at some point, but I can't find
that). So the above probably did not discharge my duty.
Rule 2201 (Self-Ratification), in part (according to the latest SLR,
modulo all existential
nix wrote:
On 3/14/24 15:08, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:53 PM nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 3/11/24 17:41, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
CFJ: There exists a rule 105.
I number this CFJ 4069. I assign CFJ
On 3/17/24 15:08, nix via agora-business wrote:
> [Right now, sentences like "Blank are an asset ownable by..." is
> interpreted to adding to a default within R2576. This seems unintuitive.
> This proposal makes that default only apply if there's no mention of
> ownership.]
That doesn't belong
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:42 PM Sarah S. via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I register, claim a welcome package, and dream of Wealth
>>
>
> Sorry, this is R. Lee
>
> --
> R. Lee
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:42 PM Sarah S. via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I register, claim a welcome package, and dream of Wealth
>
Sorry, this is R. Lee
--
R. Lee
13 matches
Mail list logo
