2009/10/24 comex :
> Proto: The Citrine Repeals
>
FOR
--
-Tiger
2009/10/24 Elliott Hird :
> Proposal: Stoma moats of atoms
> AI: 2
> II: 1
> {{{
>
> Create a new rule titled "Molting the Moats" (Power=2) with the text:
> {{
> The End-Times are Near.
>
> Any player CAN elevate any rule by announcement that e has not
> elevated before.
>
> Seven days or later aft
2009/10/25 ais523 :
> On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 00:16 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> 2009/10/24 Elliott Hird :
>> > Proposal: Stoma moats of atoms
>> > AI: 2
>> > II: 1
>> > {{{
>> >
>> > Create a new rule titled "Molting the
2009/10/26 Sean Hunt :
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> Whereas it no longer has any duties not related to cards, I resign the
>> office of Grand Poobah.
>>
> Interested in promotion or ambassad... uh... ambassading?
>
> -coppro
>
Well, the diplomatic imm
Have I got something wrong, or did we ratify into existence in the
pool proposals that were distributed six weeks before the ratification
intent was even published? If so, is there any way to remove them
except by the authors?
--
-Tiger
2009/10/27 comex :
> I intend, without two objections in 48 hours, to effect the following Rate
> List:
> [Added new cards, changed relative deck cost and card values based on
> actual usage patterns.]
>
> asset rate (zm)
> --
>
> (...)
>
> Dunce Cap 0
>
Wha
2009/10/27 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> That was your call. To be guilty, "the Accused could have reasonably avoided
>> committing the breach without committing a different breach of equal or
>> greater severity". It would be unreasonable for the Promotor
2009/10/27 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> Barring anyone removing a proposal already made distributable, this
>> should make a complete list, right?
>
> No, it doesn't include Distributable proposals that were re
2009/10/27 Sean Hunt :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> This message serves to initiate, and assign an ID number to, the
>> decision of whether to adopt the following proposal:
>>
>> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAM
2009/10/27 Sean Hunt :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> The whole thing failed, I didn't include the options or the identity
>> of the vote collector.
>>
>>
>
> I'm making this public.
>
I didn't even realise it was private, thanks.
--
-Tiger
Proto, I don't agree to this yet:
I. Contract stuff (or You know how most of this works)
The name of this contract is Agora Fluxx.
Anyone may join or leave this contract by announcement. Any party may
amend this contract without party objection. The rest of the contract
notwithstanding, membe
2009/10/27 Sean Hunt :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> The name of this contract is Agora Fluxx.
>> Anyone may join or leave this contract by announcement. Any party may
>> amend this contract without party objection. The rest of the con
2009/10/27 Jonatan Kilhamn :
> Proto, I don't agree to this yet:
>
Still a proto:
I. Contract stuff
The name of this contract is Agora Fluxx.
Anyone may join or leave this contract by announcement. Any party may
amend this contract without party objection. The rest of t
2009/10/28 comex :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> Turn Tokens are singleton assets, named by the naming scheme "TT1",
>> "TT2" and so on. If a Turn Token is transferred to or created in the
>> possession of a playe
2009/10/28 Geoffrey Spear :
> Trying to contract-define "Rules" is probably going to fail rather
> spectacularly.
>
I guess. I'll have to rename all the card classes to include card:
Rule cards, Action cards, Goal cards and Keeper cards.
--
-Tiger
Yet another proto.
Changes:
-Removed turn tokens, streamlined the turn sequence (except the first
turn, which must first be called) to the contestmaster starting it,
the player playing the cards, and then the contestmaster ending it as
soon as the other player is out of cards. Hand and keeper limit
2009/11/1 Sean Hunt :
> Proposal: Dead Contracts (AI=2, II=1)
> (...)
> -copproh
>
What's up with tacking on extra letters to your name?
--
-Tiger
2009/11/9 comex :
>
>
> Anyone up for mafia? to avoid a repeat of Werewolves, we can increase the
> pace. One day per real-life day would be fun.
>
I'm in, but not right now. However, when NaNoWriMo ends I'll start
looking over my fluxx contest again, and I'd be happy to join other
contests.
--
-
2009/11/14 ais523 :
> On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 13:29 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I play six Your Turn cards, specifying the following players:
>> Murphy
>> ais523
>> ehird
>> BobTHJ
>> Pavitra
>> c.
>
> I play Distrib-U-Matic to make "This gets on my nerves" distributable.
> (This counts as destroying
2009/11/16 Kerim Aydin :
>
>
> I play distrib-u-matic to make that proposal I submitted that adds New Zealand
> to the map of Australia distributable. -G.
>
>
Treating this as indicating the proposal Birthdayland.
--
-Tiger
2009/11/16 Sean Hunt :
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> 2009/11/16 Kerim Aydin :
>>>> I play distrib-u-matic to make that proposal I submitted that adds New
>>>> Zealand
2009/11/16 comex :
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of 3-Scroll
>> Rodney to myself.
>> I intend, without 2 objections, to create a Medal in the possession of
>> 3-Scroll Rodney.
>
> I intend, without objection, to kic
2009/11/17 comex :
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> This distribution of proposals and the subsequent assigning of ID
>> numbers initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals
>> 6567-6568 and 6570-6580. The eligible voters
2009/11/17 Aaron Goldfein :
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>>> 6578 1 1.0 Yally Green Deprioritize History
>>
>> CoE: This proposal's chamber is Red.
>>
>
> This time to the public forum.
>
Admitted, but it's not really a CoE but rather identifying s
2009/12/2 Pavitra :
> comex wrote:
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Arguments:
>>>
>>> If you think it's POSSIBLE, just try to.
>>>
>>> (In the context of R1698, is the regular democratic defense of R104
>>> the
>>> ultimate in nomic-ness or the ul
2009/12/3 Kerim Aydin :
>
> I submit the following proposal, Fast Track, AI-2:
>
> (...)
>
> Amend Rule 2261 (The Deck of Change) by replacing:
>
> * Distrib-u-Matic - Indicate an Undistributable proposal. That
> proposal becomes Distributable. Or play
>
I just realized that I left my laptop with all the proposals and stuff
in it for maintenance during the holiday, and might not get it back
this week. I don't know if this is very bad form, but I intend to wait
until I get it back and get a correct distribution a week late rather
than digging throug
2010/1/13 Sean Hunt :
> For each Proposal in the Proposal Pool, I play a Distrib-u-Matic to make it
> Distributable. If there are more than 8 such proposals, I instead make all
> of mine Distributable, plus a number to bring the total to 8 in alphabetical
> order.
>
> -coppro
>
H. Dealor, do you kn
2010/1/18 Jonatan Kilhamn :
> 2010/1/13 Sean Hunt :
>> For each Proposal in the Proposal Pool, I play a Distrib-u-Matic to make it
>> Distributable. If there are more than 8 such proposals, I instead make all
>> of mine Distributable, plus a number to bring the total to 8 in
2010/1/19 ais523 :
>
>> 6608 3 1.0 c.GreenA Terrible Proposals
> FOR, but I suspect this is not a proposal; IIRC, I'm the author of this
> one (unless c. submitted a copy of my proposal and I didn't notice).
The typo aside (should be singular 'proposal'), I got it right. A
2010/1/26 Sean Hunt
> On 01/23/2010 05:07 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> Proto: HotFix (AI=3, II=1)
>> {{{
>> Change the power of Rule 1698 (Agora is a Nomic) to 3.14159.
>> Change the power of Rule 1551 (Ratification) to 3.1.
>> [It is intentional that other Rules, in particular 105, remain at 3].
>>
2010/1/26 Sean Hunt
>
> (...)
> I play Distrib-u-Matic on the first 11 Undistributable proposals in the
> Proposal Pool in alphabetical order, except that I do not play one on a
> proposal authored by c. unless there are no Undistributable proposals
> authored by anyone else in the Pool.
>
> -c
On 30 January 2010 07:59, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 6617 0 3.0 G.* Green Fix repetition
>> 6618 0 2.0 G. Green Fix dangling reference
>> 6619 0 3.0 G. Green Encourage dependent disclosure
>> 6620 0 2.0 G. Green Regist
On 31 January 2010 21:20, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 01/31/2010 01:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> In that case I pay the fee to veto it once again. It will just raise
>> the AI one higher, right?
>>
>
> Can't do that either.
>
> -coppro
>
I
On 31 January 2010 21:30, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 01/31/2010 01:24 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> On 31 January 2010 21:20, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/31/2010 01:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In that case I pay the fee
On 7 February 2010 22:55, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On this day, one year ago, I first (and most recently) registered to
> play Agora, venturing into a game of which I knew little, and
> expecting something quite different from reality. How quickly the time
> flies.
>
Damn, I just missed my annivers
On 11 February 2010 23:10, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> ID: 6638
>> Title: Canceling Charge
>> Author: Yally
>> AI: 2.0
>> II: 1
>> Chamber: Red
>>
>> Append the following text to Rule 2284 (Fee-based actions)
>>
>> - A player CAN destroy an erg in the possession of a specified
>> player for a
It has restarted, and can be found here:
http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=54710&start=200
I know the nomics over there don't have the best track record of staying
alive, but I thought maybe the ambassador should know.
On 22 February 2010 00:49, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I resign Promotor.
>>
>> --
>> -Tiger
>>
>
> Do you have any up-to-date records of proposals submitted since your
> last distribution?
>
On 22 February 2010 14:45, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 22 February 2010 00:49, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
>> wrote:
>>> I resign Promotor.
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Tiger
>>>
>>
>> Do y
On 1 March 2010 19:43, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I indicate reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
> intends to become a player at that time.
>
It doesn't seem very clear, since you don't specify who "e" is nor at
what time e intends to become a player.
--
-Tiger
On 29 May 2010 14:34, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> Okay, I come off hold. Maybe just until I'm out of office, but maybe longer.
>
> You weren't on hold. If you had been, you wouldn't have been eligible
&g
On 2 June 2010 00:14, Sean Hunt wrote:
> List of Succession (no particular order):
>
You're right. I haven't been able to follow any particular order in
this list for a long time now. Could we please bring back that system
we had before, despite whatever was the problem with it? I think I
remember
Here follows the proto of a D-Proposal. Some of the fragments might be
a bit forced, but not too so in my opinion.
--
The Shuttle
The Shuttle is an object In Space, and it is a class Sitting Duck
space exploration vessel, where all active players are stationed. It
has three Stations: the
On 10 June 2010 22:09, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Space Flight:
>
> At the start of each day, the following procedure is performed:
> i) The Shuttle performs the action associated with the buttons pushed
> during the previous day. These are performed in the order the button
>
On 11 June 2010 18:48, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, ais523 wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 22:10 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> I create a Fragment with the following text:
>>> [[[
>>> @->---@
>>> ]]]
>>
>
On 10 June 2010 23:05, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>
>> At any time during the journey
>> may he create a Threat by specifying the following:
>
> "At any time" may be a bit generous. The Enemy could watch
On 13 June 2010 23:41, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 06/13/2010 02:37 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2805
>>
>> === CFJ 2805 (Interest Index = 0)
>>
>> Tiger created a Fragment in the above-quoted message.
>>
On 14 June 2010 19:35, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> Space Alert
>> II: 3
>> AI: 1
> General comment: The wording is not very precise, which makes the
> proposal more w
On 15/06/2010, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> On 14 June 2010 19:35, comex wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
>>> wrote:
>>>> I submit the following proposal:
>>>>
>
> Any comments? Any obvious flaws? Shall I write this up as a proper
> proposal? Would people be interested in this / fear this?
>
> - --
> ais523
I would definitely be interested. We've been lacking points for a long time now.
---
-Tiger
On 1 July 2010 15:45, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 14:27 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Happy 17th birthday, Agora!
>>
>> I award myself a Magenta ribbon.
>
> Gah, does this mean I've missed Agora's birthday twice, in the three
> Agoran birthdays I've seen?
>
> Happy birthday anyway, Agora!
>
On 17 July 2010 19:34, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, ais523 wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 00:21 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> LEFT IN A HUFF
>>> Waggie, Gecko, Kelly (x3!), Swann, KoJen, Zefram,
>>> Vlad, Andre, G., BobTHJ, P1-P10
On 19 July 2010 00:28, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I initiate elections for IADoP, Chroniclor, Herald, PSM, and Ship Computor.
>
> For IADoP, there was only 1 valid option, Wooble. The IADoP is now
> Postulated.
>
> For Chroniclor, there was
On 23 July 2010 21:14, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote:
>>> I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token."
>>
>> I disfavor this case.
>
> Me too. Also, comex, no. Don't do it. The whole Space A
On 23 July 2010 22:00, comex wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Aaron Goldfein
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, comex wrote:
I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token."
>>>
>>> I disfavor this case.
>>
On 26 July 2010 18:54, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> ..."where Lower Deck is adjacent to Enginge Room
> which is also adjacent to Bridge."
>
> Which is adjacent to what now? I can parse "which is also" as applying
> to either Engine Room or Lower Deck.
>
> -G.
>
Really? I'm not a na
First off, the story of the wild asteroid: it was created just before
midnight on a saturday. Before the day was over, ais523 had pushed the
Turbo button. The start of the next day, all Shuttle actions were
performed, meaning the Shuttle Turbo'd past the asteroid. (also before
midnight Yally had pu
On 4 August 2010 10:55, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> First off, the story of the wild asteroid: it was created just before
> midnight on a saturday. Before the day was over, ais523 had pushed the
> Turbo button. The start of the next day, all Shuttle actions were
> performed, meaning
On 5 August 2010 01:08, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I press the Turbo button.
>
> Not quite over, since the Shuttle can't disappear!
>
It can be warped though, and that's what triggers the happy ending.
--
-Tiger
On 5 August 2010 00:00, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 4 August 2010 23:42, comex wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
>> wrote:
>>> I take it you can actually afford all those threats? I will calculate
>>> their costs and your initial sup
On 14 August 2010 03:56, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, I don't really understand why Space Alert exists at
>> all...
>
> It has to exist! Where would all the fragments go?
>
The proposal had to be submitted, because where would all the
fragments go? It didn't have to be
Didn't see anyone else comment on this: the report seems to be pasted
in double. Probably a one-time error, but some of you guys use those
fancy "automations" and "python" that I've heard about so if this had
anything to do with that I thought I'd give you a heads up.
--
-Tiger
On 17 August 2010 22:21, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Having given Notice, I initiate a Journey.
>
> The map is:
>
> @>--@
>
> --Enemy Wooble
>
This causes all previous threats to be destroyed, and all active
players to be drafted to the Bridge.
Quick guide for players who haven't cared before
On 25 August 2010 09:34, Alex Smith wrote:
> --- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> OIC.
>>
>> Proposal: Mother says not to run on the concrete
>> (AI = 3, II = 1, co-author = omd, distributable via fee)
>>
>> Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing this
>> text:
>>
>> If the Ru
> And, from the rulest of 5 years ago today:
>
> Proposal: Church and State (AI=1, II=0)
> {{{
> Enact a new rule entitled "Church and State" reading
> A cardinal is an active, ready player who is neither the current
> Speaker nor the Associate Director of Personnel.
>
> While there
On 27 August 2010 22:06, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> On 26 August 2010 23:22, Keba wrote:
>> > I submit a Proposal "Journey fix" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
>>
>> I'd personally prefer a fix th
On 27 August 2010 22:15, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 22:09 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> The shuttle has completed two very short journeys in quick succession.
>> For each journey, every player who was active and not the enemy at the
>> start of it has earned one
On 1 September 2010 15:08, Warrigal wrote:
> Sgeo and I have created an informal alliance, which we're calling the
> FSCN. The goal of the FSCN is to bring its own members a
> disproportionate amount of power within Agora, and keep it. We shall
> accomplish this by promoting proposals giving power
On 1 September 2010 21:53, Keba wrote:
> Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> I vote for Keba.
>
> Thanks, seems I could have taken the office, if I showed more interest
> for it.
>
> But the voting period had ended about a quarter hour before you
> submitted your vote, so it
On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I am, though I'm not sure of what I have to offer the FSCN.
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Keba wrote:
>> I would like to join, as I like team play.
>
&
On 8 September 2010 14:08, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2010 04:05, Warrigal wrote:
>>> So, what shall we do first? I guess I can draft a proposal to create
>>> an accumulable currency that you can tur
On 9 September 2010 15:31, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I CFJ on {{Tiger is a pope.}}
>
> Arguments: "pope" is not defined by the rules, and is not primarily
> used in a mathematical or legal context, so we need to determine the
> ordinary language definition in use in the rule created by P6832.
>
> Co
On 9 September 2010 16:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> Gratuitous arguments (even though I would very much like to be a pope):
>> The fact that the 5th position in our "major arcana" is called the
>> Crown
On 9 September 2010 20:59, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 20:24 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Warrigal wrote:
>>
>> > (CotC Murphy, I'm curious what your reasoning is for assigning H.
>> > ais523 to all of these cases.)
>>
>> Aglets.
>
> I'm just happy someone used my actual gamestate-defined
On 9 September 2010 23:50, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Tiger wrote:
>
>> On 9 September 2010 09:01, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Voting results for Proposals 6830 - 6833:
>>>
>>> [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the
>>> following proposals. For each decision, the options available
On 22 September 2010 21:11, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 09/22/2010 12:19 PM, Keba wrote:
>>
>> Proposal "No Voting Limit Timing Scams" (AI=2, II=1, distributable via
>> fee)
>> {{{
>> Amend Rule 2279 "Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions" by replacing
>>
>> Take the Influence Level associated wit
On 7 October 2010 23:05, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 23:00 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> Only up to a certain point, right? If enough people do not rebel, the
>> small chance of being put really high (as one of few non-rebels)
>> outweighs the great probability
On 7 October 2010 23:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend, with notice, to Bestow Favors.
>
> -coppro
>
Can you do that?
--
-Tiger
On 7 October 2010 23:23, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I intend, with 3 support, to cause Space Alert to cease to be a
>> contest. Or has someone succeeded with this yet? Because last time I
>> didn't even get the supp
On 8 October 2010 00:19, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 06:13 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> On 7 October 2010 23:57, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/07/2010 05:23 PM, Jon
On 8 October 2010 00:29, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 06:28 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>
>> Okay, sorry.
>>
>> The Shuttle's Position is 6, as it has moved 6 times since last report
>> (when it was 0).
>>
>
> Isn't the Shuttle destroye
On 11 October 2010 23:12, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
>> > Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
>> > had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
>> >
On 12 October 2010 14:47, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> I spend a fee to move myself a position up the list, as many times as I can.
>
> I CFJ on: {{Tiger moved at least one position on the List of
> Succession as a
On 31 July 2011 02:18, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 30 July 2011 23:21, woggle wrote:
>> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deregister.
>
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to withdraw all
> previous support or objection to this intent, and to then support i
I tried to register Agora as a player of BlogNomic a few minutes ago,
but didn't think the e-mail adress through very well. First I tried my
own address, since I will be playing on Agora's behalf anyway, but it
was taken since I registered myself a long time ago. I then entered
agora-discussion whi
On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construct in the rules
> allowing it to; the only affect this will have is to spam the lists.
>
Well, obviously the game of agora, now an entity capable of taking
action within itself, couldn't really do such a
On 11 August 2011 16:26, Arkady English wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 15:20, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 11 August 2011 14:57, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> On 11 August 2011 00:09, Elliott Hird
>>> wrote:
>>>> Agora cannot play BlogNomic without some construc
On 11 August 2011 17:03, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 15:42, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> I don't see why it can't be the mission of the Ambassador to act in
>> Agora's best interest. That's pretty much what an ambassador used to
>> be about:
rm for Player. So when registering, I said that I
(the person Jonatan Kilhamn) wanted to join with the screen name Agora
Nomic, playing on Agora's behalf.
/Tiger
On 11 August 2011 19:25, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that Tiger violated the power-1
>> Rule 2352 by failing to attempt to cause Agora to become a player of
>> BlogNomic as soon as possible after e became Ambassador.
>>
On 11 August 2011 19:41, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 11 August 2011 19:25, omd wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that Tiger violated the power-1
>>> Rule 2352 by failing to attempt to cause
On 11 August 2011 19:06, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that Tiger violated the power-1
> Rule 2352 by failing to attempt to cause Agora to become a player of
> BlogNomic as soon as possible after e became Ambassador.
>
> Unfortunately, it's beyond the scope of this cas
On 12 August 2011 12:38, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 19:48 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> On 11 August 2011 19:06, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> > I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that Tiger violated the power-1
>> > Rule 2352 by failing to attempt to cause
On 12 August 2011 12:48, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 12 August 2011 12:38, ais523 wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 19:48 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> On 11 August 2011 19:06, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> > I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that Tiger violated
On 12 August 2011 16:08, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> Doesn't the ordinary-language definitions of "affairs of state (of
>> Agora)" and "ambassador" mean anything? When a rule says that
>&
On 15 August 2011 11:13, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:02, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> b) The goals the Ambassador SHOULD strive to fulfill when acting
>> on Agora's behalf in that nomic
>>
>> c)The limits on what actions the Ambass
On 15 August 2011 12:25, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 03:22, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>>
>> Right, maybe the SHOULD quoted ought to be a SHALL?
>>
>> - Tiger
>>
>
> Yeah, that makes sense. Originally I thought it didn't for s
On 17 August 2011 21:06, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> The Ambassador generally CAN act on behalf of Agora to cause
>> it to register and take actions in foreign nomics.
>
> This is useless unless the other nom
On 18 August 2011 08:16, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Honestly a lot of this/almost all of this is up to the other Nomic.
>
> Not necessarily. In Tiger's BlogNomic post:
>
>> I now wish to leave the game, but use this account to re-enter
>> the game with m
301 - 400 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
