On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 00:34 -0400, omd wrote:
But welcome to Agora! Since I think it would be a fine tradition to
NoV new players, although I can rarely find any cause to, here's one:
Bucky violated Power-3 Rule 2170 by selecting the confusing nickname
John Smith. (You should probably
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:43:20 -0400, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
A bit of readable text, followed by complete garbage.
Sorry about that, I'll send my messages in plain text from now on. =P
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Zac Sipes
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 08:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:52 PM
Hi =)
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Flameshadowxeroshin
flameshadowxeros...@gmail.com wrote:
What I meant to say was person, not citizen. That was a mistake on my
part.
I also won't be sending any more MIME messages; that was another mistake.
Also, hello!
This confirms what I understand of Agoran Politics so far:
Fun = CfJs all around. =P
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:36 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
wrote:
I think you should just scrap ergs entirely and turn marks into
That's what I meant: Fun /is/ CfJs all around. =)
(It was more of an assignement that a causality statement.)
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.cawrote:
On 10-11-16 06:32 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
This confirms what I understand of Agoran Politics so far
How can I qualify as a Watcher? I can't find the requirements in the rules,
instead finding that Watchers aren't defined there. =P
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:40, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On
NttPF - oh wait.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3 December 2010 22:17, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I want a secret currency.
There already is one, you just
Hi! =)
The specifics depend on the Nomic you're playing, but you can find a
general how-to here:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/nomic.htm#how to play
Other than that, your best bet is to lurk in a few games, watching
without playing and gathering how that game is played and what its
, Dec 12, 2010 at 21:18, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! =)
The specifics depend on the Nomic you're playing, but you can find a
general how-to here:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/nomic.htm#how to play
Other than that, your best bet is to lurk in a few
I amazes me that this actually passed. This is a /dictatorship/, for
crying out loud. =P
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:31 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
*6913 D1 1.0 omd Dictatorship
Can I claim
I intend to become a Player, so I register under the nickname Roujo.
I object, if possible.
I stand, if possible.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 14:59, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at
I wasn't sure what my initial position would be - I joined in a hurry
to object -, so I wanted to make sure I was standing. =P
~ Roujo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:14 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:16 -0500, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
I stand, if possible
This is epic. =)
~ Roujo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Kenner Gordon kenner...@gmail.com wrote:
I register.
I object to all intents made by omd in the past week.
Yay! I'm Grand Vizier!
*goes to the Ruleset to figure out what I can do now*
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I pay fees to reorder the List of Succession as follows, by moving the first
person up, then the second, then the third, and so on:
1.
FOR =P
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Proto-proto: HalfLANG
(co-author = Dan Curtis Johnson)
Amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by adding definitions for KINDA,
SORTA, ALMOST and NOT QUITE.
Amend Rule 2196 (Standard Classes of Agoran Decisions) to
Oh. Right. =P
I'm curious as to what a Nomic using that kind of boolean logic
would look like.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
G. wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Elliott Hird wrote:
Amend Rule 2152 (Mother, May I?) by adding definitions for KINDA,
SORTA,
Why should we just vote FOR? =P
I'm not enclined to vote FOR something I don't even understand.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:54 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby call a Referendum to impeach each of the following officers:
- the Promotor
- the Assessor
- the Justiciar
- the Clerk of
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On 10-12-25 02:54 AM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Why should we just vote FOR? =P
I'm not enclined to vote FOR something I don't even understand.
I could explain, but it's more fun to simply chide you for not reading
That's what I thought. Still, I wanted to try. =P
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Roujo wrote:
If I can, I vote FOR * my voting limit on both of those, too.
You can't, you didn't register until after the voting periods started.
Lol? =P
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2011 02:18, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, wow.
OUR VERSION OF HISTORY IS THAT YOU LEFT BECAUSE OF BEING BUSY AND
THANKED US ALL FOR OUR AMAZING PERFORMANCE AT THE TIME.
AND WE'RE
Way to bypass the size limit. =)
~ Roujo
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
[Two part SLR]
Why Bucky? Was that his address? =P
If so, I'll do it - I had forgotten about Co-Authors anyway.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Roujo wrote:
I submit the following Proposal (with Adoption Index 1.0 and Interest
Index 1), titled A person by any other
Aren't I already standing? One of my first game actions was to stand,
and I haven't been assigned a case since. I thought it was only
because I'm considered poorly qualified to judge anything since I'm a
new player. =P
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
Okay then, I'll sit (in another message ttPF), but why wasn't it
effective? I don't recall someone telling me it wasn't - mind you, my
memory isn't all that good right now. =P
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Roujo wrote:
Aren't I already
Not to the proper forum, and standing is never possible by
announcement, but even sitting wouldn't be because we're currently in
Emergency Session.
-scshunt
Nevermind, found it. Thanks for the heads-up. =)
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com
... I don't know how I missed this - I was pretty tired last night -,
but yeah: R1769a) would be the way to go. Is there anything I can do
now that I've judged this? =P
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:57 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
10, 2011 at 12:01 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not think that this was a scam, since I do not believe it was
expected to succeed. I also do not see how this is an abuse of other
player's time
to cease being a player since his citizenship
is already set to Unregistered, so it can't be switched from
Registered to Unregistered, so he can't be deregistered until he
rejoins.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Jonathan
reason.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:04 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, omd did publish a Cantus Cygneys, but his deregistration
wasn't a Writ of FAGE but rather his own doing. I thus judge CFJ
That could be interesting! =)
~ Roujo
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Taral tar...@gmail.com wrote:
Proto-proto:
Office elections start with a player bidding X ergs for the position.
Other players can bid against them, and lowest bid wins (after a
certain amount of time? anti-sniping?).
Holy. Crap. What is this.
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
to amuse ais523:
I initiate an election for Pariah. I nominate myself as Pariah.
--Wooble
I support.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:57 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:52 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
this am a test
I object.
--
ais523
Crap... I thought the 4th Amendment had predecence... =S
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
I sell my soul to the Lord Demon of UNDEAD
Lest some of us abuse the dictatorship or, better yet, don't pass it on. =P
~ Roujo
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:50 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:21 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I intend, with notice, to cause Rule 2324 to:
a) enact a Rule with power-1,
Yay! I support such a system, be it yours or omd's. =)
I have one comment: About the Ultimate Public Servant... I think
Statistician should be added to the list of required offices.
~ Roujo
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll likely wait to propose this
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I can't be bothered to read that, but I deregister if I can.
-scshunt
I'm curious as to why do you keep doing that.
~ Roujo
Yeah... If a CFJ on the condition would be judged TRUE or FALSE (so
not UNDECIDABLE or something else), the condition is clear so I think
the intent is also clear. Of course, if the condition status is
FALSE... There's no registration. =P
That being said, if we're going on intent alone... One
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Obligatory CFJ, disqualifying omd: omd is a player.
But... If omd is a player... He can be assigned... If he's not... He
can't... Why bar him? =P
Oh. Wait. He might become a player before CFJs are assigned... Got it. (^_^)
The auction system was a nice idea. What happened to that? =)
~ Roujo
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 13:17, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Alex Smith wrote:
I can only conclude that the
Protosal: Repeal all the even numbered rules.
~ Roujo
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I don't have the patience to construct one of those magical proposals
that repeals half the game, so I'll leave the task to someone else.
But we really
Proto: Initiate an Agoran Decision to repeal each rule in the Ruleset.
Or something. My point being that we'd get to vote keeping on each rule.
~ Roujo
P.S: I'm kiddding, that would be so much paperwork and the
game could break in SO MANY WAYS! =P
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:09 AM,
I like that Acorn idea. =D
~ Roujo
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:12, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 16 February 2011 17:22, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Ok start at the endpoint. What
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 9:12 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:56 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
No activity for days, this is a test...
I object.
--
ais523
I support unless this has already self-ratified, in which case I don't.
~ Roujo
Yeah, I was wondering why I wasn't listed here even though I /did/
vote on that Proposal... =P
~ Roujo
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I deputize for the Assessor to publish
I see. =P Oh well. It was worth a try! (^_^)
~ Roujo
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Is that even possible? =P I wasn't sure, so I didn't do it. Oh well.
If possible, I change my vote on 6970
I do too. =P
Fatal Error:
lib/WikiDB/SQL.php:25 Error: Assigning the return value of new by reference
is deprecated
Warning: substr() expects parameter 3 to be long, string given (...repeated
2 times)
lib/WikiDB/SQL.php:25 Error: Assigning the return value of new by reference
is
Thanks for the info! =)
~ Roujo
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Roujo wrote:
I vote FOR all of these a number of times equal to my voting limit.
Question: If I just say I vote FOR all of these, do I implicitely do
it a number of times equal to my
Nevermind, somehow G's support didn't come up in the good thread. =P
~ Roujo
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
I support and do so, although I'm not sure how. =P
~ Roujo
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:19 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote
Whoa. I missed the last part, where you actually judged FALSE. Sorry
about that! 'was tired yesterday. =P
~ Roujo
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
Uuhhh...
Gratuitous arguments:
A. Any /person/ identified by the author as a co-author
I support a number of times equal to the number of bears in Canada, or
12000 times if that number is unclear or unknown.
~ Roujo
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:50 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011,
I don't think it's relevant: a vote is a vote! =D
~ Roujo
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
In what election?
I don't.
~ Roujo
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate an election for Scorekeepor, nominating myself and Wooble.
I nominate myself.
—Tanner L. Swett
It's probably my lack of experience speaking, but I don't get how
these are disturbing. =P
~ Roujo
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I find the precedent of CFJs two-nine-nine-one and two-two-nine-two
(my number keys are broken) disturbing,
I support and do so.
~ Roujo
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:06 +, ais523 wrote:
This is a test.
Whoops, wrong year...
(I was checking to see if there was some sort of firewall preventing me
just sending email by hand
Tu ne parles pas français certain, sinon tu saurais que la français,
ça ne se dit pas. =P
Also, Nomic is still Nomic in French. At least, I've never seen it
refered to as Nomique.
~ Roujo
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I submit a proposal, titled
Je sais que ça n'est pas du beau français international. =P
Ça ressemblait plus à du Québécois parlé, ce qui était voulu. (^_^)
~ Roujo
2011/5/8 Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca:
On 11-05-08 04:01 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Tu ne parles pas français certain, sinon tu saurais que la
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I think the word nomic was coined from the Greek nomos
(managing) by analogy to logic, from the Greek logos (reason).
I'm continuing the analogy.
—Tanner L. Swett, who would sound dumber without the Internet
Maybe that
Probablement. =P Until they deliberate on the matter, I'll stick with Nomic.
~ Roujo
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote
I don't, actually. =P
~ Roujo
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:50 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:47 -0400, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
I intend, without objection, to inactivate myself.
I object to the preceding intention.
I object, to avoid ambiguity. (You
Nice find, Murphy. =)
~ Roujo
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
On 5/18/2011 2:55 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
Tsáʼásziʼ bideeʼí éí Naakaii Bikéyah dóó Shádiʼááhjí W.B.A.di hólǫ́;
bineestʼąʼ éí adeeʼ nahalin. Díí tsáʼásziʼ éí bitʼąąʼ 10–40 inch
áníłnéez
Hmmm... I change my vote on all open Proposals I've voted on to AGAINST.
~ Roujo
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote FOR all of these.
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
(omd, I see
Oh, sorry.
I change my vote on all open Proposals I've voted on to AGAINST.
~ Roujo
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:44 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Hmmm... I change my vote on all open Proposals I've voted on to AGAINST.
NttPF
Yeah, I know. If I can just manage to send it to the right list...
I change my vote on all open Proposals I've voted on to AGAINST.
~ Roujo
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:56 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Oh, sorry.
I change my
Which is actually why it leads to an objection. What CFJ was that again?
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/07/2011 06:46 AM, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 19:43 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
On 06/06/2011 07:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote
Why shouldn't we? =P
~ Roujo
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/09/2011 12:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, omd wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
7076 1 omd No harm in knowing
And I'm back. So yeah. =P
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:03 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to make Droowl inactive.
I intend, without objection, to make Roujo inactive.
Gmail ftw. Also, oh hai. Welcome to this wonderful land of Nomickiness. =)
Disclaimer: I object to Math321's registration. Having received no
objection, I do so.
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:11 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:03 -0700, Joshua Murphy
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:54, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Are any other Gmail users getting an annoying This message may not
have been sent by: at the top of all of their own messages to the
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm now seeing this on the first message in any thread to the lists if
it was posted by a gmail user. I wonder if gmail's suddenly not liking
how the mailing list is resending messages from gmail users.
That must be
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Happy 18th birthday, Agora!
Since Agora is now a legal adult in most countries, I think it's
appropriate that we stop telling it what to do and let the game decide
for itself how to alter its ruleset, gamestate,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On 06/29/11 12:45, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Agora can make its own decisions. If, at any time, Agora wishes to
counteract a decision, then that decision, rules to the contrary
notwithstanding, has no effect. The game
Yay! That's nice. =)
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/litigants.php
http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/judges.php
I do so.
~ Roujo
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:11 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip the Speed to Fast.
I object.
I weakly
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately you are already inactive.
--
Charles Walker
When did that happen? The last Census, dated August 5th, lists me as
active and I didn't see a message go through since then that
inactivated me. Did I
Whew. =P
~ Roujo
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 August 2011 18:16, Jonathan Rouillard jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately you are already
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Proto: Default posture is sitting. Players dinged for failing to judge
should be sentenced DISCHARGE if within 3 months of first registration.
Good idea. =D
~ Roujo
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I support.
~ Roujo
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:58 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
You can. This deregistration mechanism is basically to clear out players
who are no longer paying attention to the game; in fact, it's usual and
intended for the player targeted to be the player who objects.
Along
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Ozymandias Haynes
ozymandias.hay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Also, TRUE is an incorrect judgement, because you have not won the
game, regardless of what the judgement says. If I CFJ'd
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Ozymandias Haynes
ozymandias.hay...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, hello Agora! I really like the game you have going here. The
FLR is a beautiful work with many elegant solutions to difficult
philosophical and logical problems.
Hullo to you, and welcome. Agora
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:50 AM, Arkady English wrote:
1. A new round of Brainfuck Golf. Timing set up to garner more
entries.
Pardon my ignorance, but what is this? Or is it playing code golf in
an obscure language,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
First, it was ruled in CFJ 3287 that it is impossible to cash ais523's
promises to give ais523 trading cards in exchange for other trading
cards. The result is that Max Schutz, scshunt, and I gave trading
cards to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:18 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, no point in rebutting this since it's already opined, but for
the record, I still strongly disagree with this line of reasoning... I
believe that it gratuitously changes what the rules say into what
they're meant to say,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
These acronyms are all in the rules. VC stands for voting credit. VVLOP
doesn't officially stand for anything.
VVLOP is defined in Rules 2389-2390.
Well, yeah. However, what
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I would happily give up this extremely-low-effort office to anyone
who would like it, especially anyone more involved in foreign nomics
than I am. -G.
There's only one, really. =P
I guess I could take it. Seems simple
I know it *should* be possible but I tend to put these disclaimers
anyway at times. I'm afraid that one day I won't put one and end up in
trouble for the Class 3 Crime of Attempting the Impossible. Or
something. =P
Thanks for the clarifications, anyway. =)
~ Roujo
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:07
Gratuitous:
Yes, Rule 2380 could have changed itself, but that would have read
something like I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause Rule 2380 to
change the text of Rule 2380 to [...]. or I intend, with Agoran
Consent, to cause Rule 2380 to cause Rule 2380 to read [...].. The
way he said it, it
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Max Schutz maxschutz...@gmail.com wrote:
isn't that statement paradoxical in nature
Yes. Yes is it.
I call a CfJ on the following statement: AGAINT should never, by
definition, be precisely defined.
I call a CfJ on the following statement: The statement
Oh, and about Deepnomic... It seems the game is still in progress,
although there's just a single person submitting proposals and voting
on them. Which brings me to the following...
I submit the following proposal, Legally Insane:
{{
In Rule 2369, Foreign Relations, add the following paragraph
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip B Nomic's recognition to
Abandoned. I haven't heard from those guys in a looong while now - I
don't think the gamestate reconstruction ever
,
discussed at spoon-disc...@nomic.net.
~ Roujo
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
AMBASSADOR-AT-LARGE Recognition-of-Nomics Report
Nomic
Acknowledged. I'll wait a bit to see if B's gamestate problem gets
resolved, then I'll make another batch.
~ Roujo
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote
Yeah, and I had to defend Agora on that matter when OmNomNomic's
Inquisitor started to question me on our beligerent attitude during
that period. It was most pleasant.
Well, he also questionned me on why Agora had a distinct lack of hats,
so take from that what you will. =P
~ Roujo
On Fri, Apr
, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Max Schutz wrote:
hilariously enough i saw both of those things on reddit
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, and I had to defend Agora
It might be because of Rule 2378, Court Protector. Since the AaL
seems to be the backup CotC, maybe you wanted to tag him in your
reports.
~ Roujo
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Roujo wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Ed Murphy
Sounds awesome. Some of the offices listed don't exist anymore, though.
~ Roujo
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes:
- G. and Murphy's suggestions
- Now Ruble is replaced with Yak in Plutocratic Chamber
A handy list of rewards and
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
What I'm trying to do is shorten the full phrase SHALL in a timely
manner and CAN by announcement. (so, including the most common
time frame and method in the abbreviation). We don't want to extend
SHALL to mean *all*
You CAN taunt the police. It's just also a crime if you do. =P
Basically, it's a way making sure you'll respect a deal. To make
people sure that you won't do X, just make a promise that says I
taunt the police specifying 10, with the condition for cashing being
I did X. If you don't do X, all is
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
