DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7688 and 7689

2014-07-30 Thread Chester Mealer
ID: 7689 Against
ID: 7688 Present

Chester Mealer


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:36 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  ID: 7688
   Salary is a non-singleton Switch tracked by the IADoP.
 Doesn't satisfy R2162 a) or b).
   During the nomination period of an election, each candidate CAN
 What is a candidate?
   At the beginning of each month, the Scorekeeper is
   impelled to award each officeholder a number of points equal to
   the sum of the salaries of eir offices for which the officeholder
   held the office for at least two weeks continuously in the
   previous month.
 What is impelled?  And should be Scorekeepor.

 Against.

  ID: 7689

 Against.



DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Deputy Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7685-7687

2014-07-21 Thread Chester Mealer
I vote AGAINST all proposals on which I am able to vote.



Chester Mealer


On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Edward Murphy emurph...@zoho.com wrote:

 7685   2omd  Allow Resigning the Speakership

 AGAINST

  7686   3omd  Cleanup

 FOR

 7687   1HenriDeregistration

 FOR





DIS: Re: BUS: Purge

2014-07-17 Thread Chester Mealer
If I can object to a single name, I object to my own (cdm014), otherwise I
object to the entire motion.

cdm014
On Jul 17, 2014 7:27 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:

 I intend to deregister the following players in four days:

 Bayushi
 cdm014
 Fool
 Khoyo
 Walker
 woggle
 Liberon
 Yally



Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

2014-07-02 Thread Chester Mealer
Rights and responsibilities to Agora are part of playerness. Taking up the
rights and responsibilities is synonymous with becoming a player.

Many thanks for your support, Burgundy Haze.

cdm014


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jonathan Rouillard 
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu
 wrote:
 
 
  On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Chester Mealer wrote:
  I resume my identity as cdm014 with all rights and responsibilities to
 agora associated with that identity.
  Chester Mealer
 
  Hrm, subject line registration, identity not playerness...
  I'll let someone else do the honors...

 I support and do so.

 ~ Burgundy Haze



DIS: Re: agora-official digest, Vol 1 #2454 - 2 msgs

2009-02-14 Thread Chester Mealer
I cast the following votes as many times as I am allowed

6086 AGAINST
6087 AGAINST
6088 FOR
6089 FOR
6090 AGAINST
6091 FOR
6092 AGAINST
6093 AGAINST
6094 FOR
6095 AGAINST
6096 AGAINST
6097 AGAINST
6098 AGAINST
6099 AGAINST
6100 AGAINST
6101 AGAINST
6102 AGAINST
6103 FOR
6104 FOR
6105 AGAINST
6106 AGAINST
6107 AGAINST
6108 AGAINST


cmealerjr
cdm...@gmail.com


DIS: Re: agora-official digest, Vol 1 #2455 - 9 msgs

2009-02-14 Thread Chester Mealer
In the matter of CFJ 2378, I judge the question to be undetermined.
According to cfj 1744:

[CFJ 1744 (called 18 September 2007): It is not the job of the judge
to hunt down or request the information that would be required to
render a substantive judgement.]

The callers arguments provided insufficient reference to an earlier
CFJ which the caller believes to be relevant to the case.

I also find it to be impossible to judge the qualities of a
non-existent entity, specifically rule 2238, which does not appear in
the FLR at the time of my research into the matter.  And I saw no
evidence it was in existence a the time this inquiry was called.




Chester Mealer
cdm...@gmail.com


DIS: Re: agora-discussion digest, Vol 1 #2923 - 11 msgs

2008-08-14 Thread Chester Mealer
My message of deregistering apparently was not received. It is however in my
sent e-mail. Hmmm... there might be  something interesting in that.

-cdm014


DIS: Re: agora-discussion digest, Vol 1 #2921 - 12 msgs

2008-08-13 Thread Chester Mealer
I had posted a message indicating my intent to deregister. Assuming my
deregistering was successful, I don't know why it wouldn't be, I would need
to register again.

--cdm014


DIS: trustees

2008-06-22 Thread Chester Mealer
I'm about to be busy and ehird gave me an idea.

I would announce intent to act according to the announcements unless I
specify otherwise of the following when someone creates a partnership with
the following clauses:

1. this Partnership shall be known as the cdm014 board of trustees.

2. No player may join this partnership if 5 first class players are already
party to this contract.

3. Only first class players may join this contract, they may do so by
announcing eir intent to join.

4. Parties to this contract are known as trustees.

5. No party may amend this contract without support of cdm014 and support of
a majority of trustees.

6. All trustees shall act in the best interest of cdm014 when acting
according to the terms of this contract.

7. this partnership shall act to ensure that cdm014 and this partnership
fulfill all obligations and duties under Agoran rules and laws.

8. Any party with support of a majority of trustees and without objection
from cdm014 may make an announcement about how the player cdm014 will act if
e does not declare
   intent to act otherwise by announcing cdm014's intent to act in the form
of cdm014 action the action must be one cdm014 is capable of making
according to the rules and laws of agora.

I'm buying a house and moving soon but I didn't want to deregister and I
wanted to be able to remain an active participant and so I think this is an
interesting idea, if I announce my intent to act according to the
announcements made by the partnership.

-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: proto Stock Market

2008-06-19 Thread Chester Mealer
I'll keep working on it. I thought it would be an interesting contest. I'm
glad to see others agree.

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ivan Hope wrote:

  {The name of this contract is The Corporation. This is a public
  contract. Parties to this contract SHALL ensure it fulfills all its
  obligations.
 
  Shares of stock (shares, for short) are a currency. Ownership of
  shares is restricted to players.
 
  This contract can be amended with the majority consent of all shares,
  where a share is considered to consent if its owner consents.}


 http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-May/006393.html




-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: proto Stock Market

2008-06-19 Thread Chester Mealer
Yeah I'm beginning to see how far over my head I was.
-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Mill me please

2008-06-18 Thread Chester Mealer
E is only allowed to create or destroy land according to the contract. (I'm
assuming)

The contract states in order to create the land e must revoke 3 points.

Ergo, there is an argument to be made that announcing the creation of the
land, is also a de jure announcement that e has revoked the points.

The later announcement that the points have been revoked might not be false
depending on if an on or about clause was present and if the about could
extend backwards to the point of the announcing the land had been created.
In this case it would be the same as making the two announcements via
separate emails and having the second arrive first.

However, I'm not the judge on the CFJ (yet).

-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Office of Greeter

2008-06-18 Thread Chester Mealer
my statement should satisfy CFJ 712 as unambiguous enough to refer to em.


-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


DIS: proto Stock Market

2008-06-18 Thread Chester Mealer
, the symbol of
shares they wish to exchange, and the number
of shares they wish to exchange. The player posting the message shall be
the recordkeepor of eir own desire to
exchange SMDs for shares.

29. Two players may exchange SMDs for shares with SEC approval by announcing
eir intent to do so. The SEC President shall
then effect the exchange and record its occurance.

30. Negotiation between players for rate of exchange between shares with a
certain symbol and SMDs is unregulated except
neither player may offer any consideration other than a number of shares
or SMDs.



-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: proto Stock Market

2008-06-18 Thread Chester Mealer
 Broker by
announcement that e is placing a SELL ORDER. The announcement must contain
the number of symbol stocks e is wishing to trade and the pricer per
symbol stock e wants.

24. The Stock Broker CAN and SHALL with SEC support reconcile BUY ORDERS
with SELL ORDERS  and notify the SEC President of the changes in symbol
stocks and SMDs according to the procedures herein.

24. A. The Stock Broker may adjust the price on BUY ORDER or SELL ORDER to
match that on a SELL ORDER or BUY ORDER respectively provided the ORDER e is
matching it to is the ORDER of that type with a price closest to the one e
is adjusting.

24. B. If the last ORDER the stock broker adjusted was a BUY ORDER the next
order e adjusts must be a SELL ORDER. If it was a SELL ORDER the next order
e adjusts must be a BUY ORDER.

24. C. If the adjustment to a BUY ORDER would mean the ORDER has a total
cost higher than the previous total cost the Stock Broker CAN and SHALL
adjust the number of symbol stocks such that the total cost is less than
or equal to the original total cost.

24. D. If the Stock Broker reconciles part of an ORDER e shall create a new
order of the same type for that player to satisfy the difference in the
number of symbolstocks at the original price per stock.

24. E. Following this E shall request support for the reconciliation from
SEC members.

















-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration

2008-06-17 Thread Chester Mealer
no relation that I know of

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Welcome to Agora!  Any relation to ais523?

 -root




-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


DIS: 1st proposal

2008-06-17 Thread Chester Mealer
This is just an idea I'm playing around with at the moment and does not meet
the requirements of rule 106 yet to be a proposal.

Anyone have thoughts on this:

Amend rule: 1922

To append the following text:

 (g)  Official Greeter, to be awarded by the IADoP, to any player who
announces eir intent to become a greeter with Agoran consent (ratio 1). This
title is to be revoked by the IADoP only following a judgement of TRUE on a
CFJ on the statement X did not perform duties one would expect of a greeter,
where X is a player currently holding the patent title of Official Greeter.
Should one or more offices with duties of greeting and helping new players
be created, any player not currently holding that office will lose the title
of Official Greeter, and any player holding that office shall gain the title
of Official Greeter. Thereafter, the title shall be granted and revoked as
necessary to ensure that all holders of that office shall also have the
title and all players not holding that office shall not have the title.


-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: Re: BAK: Proto-proposal: Chambers

2008-06-17 Thread Chester Mealer
It seems like your proposal should say with Agoran Consent where it says
without.

Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran
consent.

Unless I missed a rule where CAN = cannot this would mean at any time a
player could simply declare a chamber as not a chamber.

so shouldn't it read:

Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber with Agoran consent.

or

Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran
objection.

?

cdm014


Re: DIS: 1st proposal

2008-06-17 Thread Chester Mealer
Because it wasn't well enough thought through, that's why i made sure it was
not a proposal.

I figured the patent title would let it be only semi-official and allow for
multiple greeters. I was under the impression only one player could fill an
office.



-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: 1st proposal

2008-06-17 Thread Chester Mealer
(Still not a proposal)
revised after some discussion  now version 2.1
Agoran Welcoming Committee

1. This creates an office called Agoran Greeter.

2. This office is an imposed office.

3. This office shall remain vacant until imposed upon a partnership entitled
Agoran Welcoming Committee. Should a partnership be so named, and meet the
other requirements for eligibility, this office shall be imposed upon that
partnership.

4. To be eligible for this office the partnership's obligations must include
all of the following:
A. Greet all new players.
B. Engage in contact with new players to assist them.
C. Engage in contact with new players to ensure a positive experience.

There now this should provide for an office for greeters and ensure they
have the proper obligations.



-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


DIS: rules?

2008-06-16 Thread Chester Mealer
On the business thread I noticed there was some talk of harvesting and crops
and what not. I saw no rules for such in the SLR and as a potential player
I'm interested in learning where I can find out more?

It is possible they are referring to some contract or contest, so mainly my
question is does the SLR contain all rules that would apply in the absence
of any contracts or anything like that.


-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DIS: rules?

2008-06-16 Thread Chester Mealer
I understand now.

-- 
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]