DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7688 and 7689
ID: 7689 Against ID: 7688 Present Chester Mealer On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:36 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote: ID: 7688 Salary is a non-singleton Switch tracked by the IADoP. Doesn't satisfy R2162 a) or b). During the nomination period of an election, each candidate CAN What is a candidate? At the beginning of each month, the Scorekeeper is impelled to award each officeholder a number of points equal to the sum of the salaries of eir offices for which the officeholder held the office for at least two weeks continuously in the previous month. What is impelled? And should be Scorekeepor. Against. ID: 7689 Against.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Deputy Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7685-7687
I vote AGAINST all proposals on which I am able to vote. Chester Mealer On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Edward Murphy emurph...@zoho.com wrote: 7685 2omd Allow Resigning the Speakership AGAINST 7686 3omd Cleanup FOR 7687 1HenriDeregistration FOR
DIS: Re: BUS: Purge
If I can object to a single name, I object to my own (cdm014), otherwise I object to the entire motion. cdm014 On Jul 17, 2014 7:27 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to deregister the following players in four days: Bayushi cdm014 Fool Khoyo Walker woggle Liberon Yally
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration
Rights and responsibilities to Agora are part of playerness. Taking up the rights and responsibilities is synonymous with becoming a player. Many thanks for your support, Burgundy Haze. cdm014 On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jonathan Rouillard jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Chester Mealer wrote: I resume my identity as cdm014 with all rights and responsibilities to agora associated with that identity. Chester Mealer Hrm, subject line registration, identity not playerness... I'll let someone else do the honors... I support and do so. ~ Burgundy Haze
DIS: Re: agora-official digest, Vol 1 #2454 - 2 msgs
I cast the following votes as many times as I am allowed 6086 AGAINST 6087 AGAINST 6088 FOR 6089 FOR 6090 AGAINST 6091 FOR 6092 AGAINST 6093 AGAINST 6094 FOR 6095 AGAINST 6096 AGAINST 6097 AGAINST 6098 AGAINST 6099 AGAINST 6100 AGAINST 6101 AGAINST 6102 AGAINST 6103 FOR 6104 FOR 6105 AGAINST 6106 AGAINST 6107 AGAINST 6108 AGAINST cmealerjr cdm...@gmail.com
DIS: Re: agora-official digest, Vol 1 #2455 - 9 msgs
In the matter of CFJ 2378, I judge the question to be undetermined. According to cfj 1744: [CFJ 1744 (called 18 September 2007): It is not the job of the judge to hunt down or request the information that would be required to render a substantive judgement.] The callers arguments provided insufficient reference to an earlier CFJ which the caller believes to be relevant to the case. I also find it to be impossible to judge the qualities of a non-existent entity, specifically rule 2238, which does not appear in the FLR at the time of my research into the matter. And I saw no evidence it was in existence a the time this inquiry was called. Chester Mealer cdm...@gmail.com
DIS: Re: agora-discussion digest, Vol 1 #2923 - 11 msgs
My message of deregistering apparently was not received. It is however in my sent e-mail. Hmmm... there might be something interesting in that. -cdm014
DIS: Re: agora-discussion digest, Vol 1 #2921 - 12 msgs
I had posted a message indicating my intent to deregister. Assuming my deregistering was successful, I don't know why it wouldn't be, I would need to register again. --cdm014
DIS: trustees
I'm about to be busy and ehird gave me an idea. I would announce intent to act according to the announcements unless I specify otherwise of the following when someone creates a partnership with the following clauses: 1. this Partnership shall be known as the cdm014 board of trustees. 2. No player may join this partnership if 5 first class players are already party to this contract. 3. Only first class players may join this contract, they may do so by announcing eir intent to join. 4. Parties to this contract are known as trustees. 5. No party may amend this contract without support of cdm014 and support of a majority of trustees. 6. All trustees shall act in the best interest of cdm014 when acting according to the terms of this contract. 7. this partnership shall act to ensure that cdm014 and this partnership fulfill all obligations and duties under Agoran rules and laws. 8. Any party with support of a majority of trustees and without objection from cdm014 may make an announcement about how the player cdm014 will act if e does not declare intent to act otherwise by announcing cdm014's intent to act in the form of cdm014 action the action must be one cdm014 is capable of making according to the rules and laws of agora. I'm buying a house and moving soon but I didn't want to deregister and I wanted to be able to remain an active participant and so I think this is an interesting idea, if I announce my intent to act according to the announcements made by the partnership. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: proto Stock Market
I'll keep working on it. I thought it would be an interesting contest. I'm glad to see others agree. On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ivan Hope wrote: {The name of this contract is The Corporation. This is a public contract. Parties to this contract SHALL ensure it fulfills all its obligations. Shares of stock (shares, for short) are a currency. Ownership of shares is restricted to players. This contract can be amended with the majority consent of all shares, where a share is considered to consent if its owner consents.} http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-May/006393.html -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: proto Stock Market
Yeah I'm beginning to see how far over my head I was. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: AAA - Mill me please
E is only allowed to create or destroy land according to the contract. (I'm assuming) The contract states in order to create the land e must revoke 3 points. Ergo, there is an argument to be made that announcing the creation of the land, is also a de jure announcement that e has revoked the points. The later announcement that the points have been revoked might not be false depending on if an on or about clause was present and if the about could extend backwards to the point of the announcing the land had been created. In this case it would be the same as making the two announcements via separate emails and having the second arrive first. However, I'm not the judge on the CFJ (yet). -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Office of Greeter
my statement should satisfy CFJ 712 as unambiguous enough to refer to em. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DIS: proto Stock Market
, the symbol of shares they wish to exchange, and the number of shares they wish to exchange. The player posting the message shall be the recordkeepor of eir own desire to exchange SMDs for shares. 29. Two players may exchange SMDs for shares with SEC approval by announcing eir intent to do so. The SEC President shall then effect the exchange and record its occurance. 30. Negotiation between players for rate of exchange between shares with a certain symbol and SMDs is unregulated except neither player may offer any consideration other than a number of shares or SMDs. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: proto Stock Market
Broker by announcement that e is placing a SELL ORDER. The announcement must contain the number of symbol stocks e is wishing to trade and the pricer per symbol stock e wants. 24. The Stock Broker CAN and SHALL with SEC support reconcile BUY ORDERS with SELL ORDERS and notify the SEC President of the changes in symbol stocks and SMDs according to the procedures herein. 24. A. The Stock Broker may adjust the price on BUY ORDER or SELL ORDER to match that on a SELL ORDER or BUY ORDER respectively provided the ORDER e is matching it to is the ORDER of that type with a price closest to the one e is adjusting. 24. B. If the last ORDER the stock broker adjusted was a BUY ORDER the next order e adjusts must be a SELL ORDER. If it was a SELL ORDER the next order e adjusts must be a BUY ORDER. 24. C. If the adjustment to a BUY ORDER would mean the ORDER has a total cost higher than the previous total cost the Stock Broker CAN and SHALL adjust the number of symbol stocks such that the total cost is less than or equal to the original total cost. 24. D. If the Stock Broker reconciles part of an ORDER e shall create a new order of the same type for that player to satisfy the difference in the number of symbolstocks at the original price per stock. 24. E. Following this E shall request support for the reconciliation from SEC members. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: registration
no relation that I know of On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Welcome to Agora! Any relation to ais523? -root -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DIS: 1st proposal
This is just an idea I'm playing around with at the moment and does not meet the requirements of rule 106 yet to be a proposal. Anyone have thoughts on this: Amend rule: 1922 To append the following text: (g) Official Greeter, to be awarded by the IADoP, to any player who announces eir intent to become a greeter with Agoran consent (ratio 1). This title is to be revoked by the IADoP only following a judgement of TRUE on a CFJ on the statement X did not perform duties one would expect of a greeter, where X is a player currently holding the patent title of Official Greeter. Should one or more offices with duties of greeting and helping new players be created, any player not currently holding that office will lose the title of Official Greeter, and any player holding that office shall gain the title of Official Greeter. Thereafter, the title shall be granted and revoked as necessary to ensure that all holders of that office shall also have the title and all players not holding that office shall not have the title. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: Re: BAK: Proto-proposal: Chambers
It seems like your proposal should say with Agoran Consent where it says without. Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran consent. Unless I missed a rule where CAN = cannot this would mean at any time a player could simply declare a chamber as not a chamber. so shouldn't it read: Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber with Agoran consent. or Any player CAN cause a chamber to cease to be a chamber without Agoran objection. ? cdm014
Re: DIS: 1st proposal
Because it wasn't well enough thought through, that's why i made sure it was not a proposal. I figured the patent title would let it be only semi-official and allow for multiple greeters. I was under the impression only one player could fill an office. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: 1st proposal
(Still not a proposal) revised after some discussion now version 2.1 Agoran Welcoming Committee 1. This creates an office called Agoran Greeter. 2. This office is an imposed office. 3. This office shall remain vacant until imposed upon a partnership entitled Agoran Welcoming Committee. Should a partnership be so named, and meet the other requirements for eligibility, this office shall be imposed upon that partnership. 4. To be eligible for this office the partnership's obligations must include all of the following: A. Greet all new players. B. Engage in contact with new players to assist them. C. Engage in contact with new players to ensure a positive experience. There now this should provide for an office for greeters and ensure they have the proper obligations. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DIS: rules?
On the business thread I noticed there was some talk of harvesting and crops and what not. I saw no rules for such in the SLR and as a potential player I'm interested in learning where I can find out more? It is possible they are referring to some contract or contest, so mainly my question is does the SLR contain all rules that would apply in the absence of any contracts or anything like that. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DIS: rules?
I understand now. -- Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED]