Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Infraction Reaction

Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 8, 2024, at 3:22 PM, juan via agora-discussion > wrote: > > 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2024-04-05 19:16]: >> What does take complete control of Agora mean? >> >> Is any statement that is simply "not true" sufficient? >> >> Overall I find this to be

DIS: Re: BUS: Actions (@ Dream Keeper, Collector)

> On Apr 7, 2024, at 1:21 PM, Jaff via agora-business > wrote: > > I envision my dream of wealth. This fails: dreams were repealed this morning. Gaelan

DIS: Re: BUS: (@Notary, Arbitor) A Broken Promise

> On Apr 7, 2024, at 1:19 PM, ais523 via agora-business > wrote: > > I call for judgement on the statement "Yachay CAN cash Promise Q, > either by directly cashing it, or by transferring it from the Library > to emself and then cashing it." > > I call for judgement on the statement "I CAN

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] You deserve it!

> On Apr 4, 2024, at 7:25 PM, juan via agora-discussion > wrote: > > > I want to ensure whoever will take my place during that period can use > my tools effectively. Who would like to volunteer? Incidentally, if you’d like to share your code and/or data, we’ve got the @AgoraNomic

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: yes, yes, I got the memo

> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:53 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion > wrote: > > I suggest "un-noted" to prevent all instances of noting 1 infraction > multiple times. That doesn’t fix the original issue, as an infraction can be investigated without being noted. And I don’t really think

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: yes, yes, I got the memo

> On Mar 25, 2024, at 8:06 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On 25/03/2024 19:13, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: >> Amend rule 2478 (“Justice”) by replacing: { >> A player CAN, by announcement, "note" an unforgiven inf

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: one from the archives

> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:> * > Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy >> of archival. > > hmm... the "

DIS: Proto: One from the archives

I proto-create the following proposal: {{{ Title: One from the archives Author: Gaelan AI: 1 Re-enact rule 417, with the following text: { The Archivist is an office; its holder is responsible for ensuring the continued availability of documents of historical interest. The archivist’s

DIS: Re: Rulekeeping is hard, turns out

> On Mar 11, 2024, at 1:56 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > I submit a claim of error on the most recent full logical ruleset, > specifying the following errors, most of which are not the current > H. Rulekeepor’s fault and several of which are mine: Another one (explicitly

Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] CFJ 4056 assigned to @Gaelan [Re: BUS: (@Arbitor) Recusal - CFJ 4056]

Thanks for the notes! > On Mar 18, 2024, at 12:37 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion > wrote: > > (could have failed due to, e.g., issues with CFJ 4069) Interestingly this one isn’t actually an issue in Agoran’t - it was explicitly initialized with a rule numbered 105 with specified text,

DIS: Photo: officially official

I proto-submit the following proposal: { Title: Officially Official (and Backuply Backup) Authors: Gaelan AI: 1 Create a power-1 rule titled “Forum Purposes”, with the following text: { Purpose is a public forum switch, with values Business (default), Official, and Backup.

DIS: Re: [Arbitor] CFJ 4056 assigned to @Gaelan [Re: BUS: (@Arbitor) Recusal - CFJ 4056]

> On Mar 16, 2024, at 5:38 PM, nix via agora-business > wrote: > > I assign CFJ 4056 to Gaelan. Some preliminary thoughts; arguments on any of these points (or any points I missed) are welcome. The argument for TRUE is, broadly, that message 327 created a power-4.9 rule (“SILENCE”) which

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ah what the hell (Registrar, Dream Keeper)

> On Mar 17, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:42 PM Sarah S. via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> I register, claim a welcome package, and dream of Wealth >> > > Sorry, this is R. Lee > > -- > R. Lee

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Birthday Announcement

> > Congrats on your 2th! Someone should propose the 2th fairy to grant you > some $$$! > > -- > 4ˢᵗ > > Uncertified Bad Idea Generator hey, $$$ is *my* new Agoran thing (Context for those who weren’t around: one of my first proposals was a Very Bad Proposal attempting to introduce a

Re: DIS: Request for Feedback: What's the Method Anyway?

> On Mar 12, 2024, at 10:48 PM, nix via agora-discussion > wrote: > > This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all > of the arguments there. > > I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires > an "unambiguous and clear specification of the

Re: DIS: Re: [Arbitor] Assignment of CFJ 4072 to nix [Re: BUS: [CFJ] Another R105 CFJ]

> On Mar 12, 2024, at 3:04 PM, nix via agora-discussion > wrote: > > I haven't started drafting, but not sure I quite agree with this. A rule > change is defined as "any effect that falls into the above classes", so > the "full text" would be the full text of the change. Your reading seems >

Re: DIS: CFJ 4062 draft-judged TRUE

> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:39 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > wrote: > > >> On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:37 PM, nix via agora-business >> wrote: >> >> On 1/28/24 00:59, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: >>> I CFJ: "Proposal

DIS: CFJ 4062 draft-judged TRUE

> On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:37 PM, nix via agora-business > wrote: > > On 1/28/24 00:59, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> I CFJ: "Proposal 9051, as part of its effect, applied a rule change." >> > > I number this CFJ 4062. I assign CFJ 4062 to Gaelan. This is a draft judgement, as I

DIS: Re: [Arbitor] Assignment of CFJ 4072 to nix [Re: BUS: [CFJ] Another R105 CFJ]

> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:31 AM, nix via agora-business > wrote: > > On 3/11/24 19:16, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> I CFJ: "There exists an entity that is a Rule with ID number 2687." > > I number this CFJ 4072. Unfortunately, I assign CFJ 4072 to nix. > > -- > nix > A related

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

> On Mar 5, 2024, at 3:51 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 15:45 +0000, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > wrote: >> On Mar 5, 2024, at 4:37 AM, Aris via agora-business >> wrote: >>> >>> Erm... that CFJ does

DIS: Re: BUS: ѕёѦѤ ѦѯќѤѦі (ѯѴњѩћѰ ђѨѯ ѕёѪѐ ѥѰ)

> On Mar 4, 2024, at 6:55 PM, nix via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On 3/4/24 12:19, Goren Barak via agora-business wrote: >> ѣѧѤѴ ѩќѹѩ, >> Ѳ ћѧђѤѺ ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ ѓ ·њѧѯ ѯ ·ќѹѧѯ >> ё ѳњѡѧђё, ѮѲё "Ѳ ѳњѡѧђё ё ѝѦђёѹѰ њѲ ѨѐѩєѰ" >> >> ќѫћњѲ ѩќѹѩ > > A few notes on this, besides the fact it

DIS: Re: BUS: Registering

> On Mar 5, 2024, at 4:37 AM, Aris via agora-business > wrote: > > Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be > statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is > different from interpreting it in context. Without commenting on the rest of

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9046-9048

I vote as follows: > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- > 9046~ 4st, ais523, Gaelan 1.0 Crystal fix 1 FOR > 9047* 4st, Janet, ais523 3.0 Shameless copy of Adoption AI > Security with the right

DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 9032-9034

> On Dec 3, 2023, at 10:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-official > wrote: > > Each quarter, each crystal whose identity is not equal to the ID of any > rule in the current ruleset has its size increased by 3. Gah, just got around to reading this - when precisely does the increase happen? I feel

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9035-9039

…wait, that went to BUS in the first place; I swear I forgot to change the To line. Weird. Gaelan > On Nov 27, 2023, at 10:41 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > TTttPF (we’re back, baby) > >> On Nov 26, 2023, at 10:52 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-business >> wrote:

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9035-9039

I vote as follows: > 9035~ snail, 4st 2.0 Unbreaking Motions FOR > 9036* Janet, ais523 3.0 AI security revisted FOR > 9037~ Murphy 2.0 Uncrossed arms PRESENT (I don’t understand stones) > 9038~ Murphy 1.0 Ratify the Ruleset

Re: DIS: (drafts) LIME RIBBON LIME RIBBON

> On Nov 21, 2023, at 8:31 PM, 4st nomic via agora-discussion > wrote: > > { > Title: Public Emergency > Adoption Index: 3.1 > Author: > Co-author: 4st > > Amend Rule 2614 ("Eclipse Light") by replacing > { > An emergency message is one whose subject line contains the text >

Re: DIS: [proto] Unforceability

> On Nov 20, 2023, at 11:44 PM, 4st nomic via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 3:43 PM nix via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On 11/20/23 12:04, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >>> A Rule that purports to designate an action as

DIS: Re: BUS: Ratification

> On Nov 21, 2023, at 9:14 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > >> On Nov 20, 2023, at 2:54 PM, Goren Barak via agora-business >> wrote: >> >> I will now ratify ratify the following document, using Rule 2202 >> (Ratification Without Objection): >>

DIS: Re: BUS: Ratification

> On Nov 20, 2023, at 2:54 PM, Goren Barak via agora-business > wrote: > > I will now ratify ratify the following document, using Rule 2202 > (Ratification Without Objection): > > Effective a immediately, Goren now has 500 radiance. > Their voting strength is now 15. > Their Base Rockiness

DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Monthly report: Arrivals and Departures

> On Aug 1, 2023, at 11:57 AM, juan via agora-official > wrote: > > For any corrections, > For any suggestions or complaints of form, > Please contact the Registrar. Happened to notice a few duplicates: - Alexis and scshunt are the same person (see

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ on appointing a Distributor

> On Aug 25, 2023, at 10:34 AM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business > wrote: > > I CFJ: "It is generally POSSIBLE to alter the holder of the office of > Distributor without objection." > > This arose in Agoran't, whose ruleset is still similar enough to Agora's > that the same question

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration, and soliloquy

> No bother :) Even if this isn't one of them, I'm sure culture has > changed in some ways since I was last here - I fully expect there to be > a bit of adjustment needed from me. Spivak is still very much the default. I (speaking for myself) am happy to use other pronouns if you (or anyone)

Re: DIS: Agoran't Draft

> On Jun 20, 2023, at 7:40 PM, nix via agora-discussion > wrote: > > = > I. Amendments > = > > Any participant CAN amend these regulations in a specified way with > Agoran Consent. For this action, only support and objections from > participants count. > >

Re: DIS: An Agoran Rebuttal

Thanks. Anti-Cleisthenes deserved an on-list response, and you worded it much better than I could have. Gaelan > On Sep 12, 2022, at 1:10 AM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Regarding the recent troubles, and in particular Anti-Cleisthenes's > Cantus Cygneus: > > In one

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8851-8856

> On Sep 2, 2022, at 5:37 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-official > wrote: > > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- > 8851* 4st 3.0 Voter Protection AGAINST, as previously discussed >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Blot Holdings

> On Aug 22, 2022, at 6:24 PM, Forest Sweeney via agora-official > wrote: > > BLOT HOLDINGS(self-ratifies) > == > Blots Person > - - > 2 Gaelen CoE: I have zero

DIS: Re: BUS: Free-for-all

> On Aug 21, 2022, at 7:54 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business > wrote: > > 100 times, I pay a fee of 0 coins to grant myself a Gaelan stamp. > I pay a fee of 0 coins to buy a beast permit. > 100 times, I pay a fee of 0 coins to buy bird food. > > Gaelan (Contex

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 8829-8836

> On Aug 20, 2022, at 11:02 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business > wrote: > > > >> On Aug 20, 2022, at 10:36 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official >> wrote: >> >> IDTitle Result >> -

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8829-8836

> reports (or, to a lesser degree, HTML reports) are fine, and a SHOULD or, to a lesser degree, email reports* Gaelan

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Spivak Standardization Act

Nitpicks: > The Spivak pronouns (e/em/eir) are hereby recognized as the standard > third-person singular personal pronouns in Agora. In official contexts, > players SHOULD use them when referring to non-specific persons or, in > the absence of a clear statement of another preference, when

DIS: Re: BUS: (@Horsened) [Motivation] The first gallop!

> I suspect this fails – the rules state that you CAN do this, but don't > state how, so there's no reason to expect that sending a message to a-b > that says you do so is sufficient. (It is possible to do this via > proposal or via ratification-without-objection, which satisfies the CAN >

DIS: Re: BUS: [DoV?] Apathy resolution

> On Mar 5, 2022, at 6:31 PM, nix via agora-business > wrote: > > CFJ: Jason's purported apathy intent was sent to all players. > > CFJ: Jason's purported apathy intent contained a "clear designation of intent > to be public.” Grat.: Rule 1728/43 requires a declaration of intent to

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] RTRW Recording

I’ll take these: The tabled action rules (1728 and 2124) 2603, switch responsibility Happy to do as many more as is necessary. Gaelan > On Feb 8, 2022, at 8:16 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official > wrote: > > Well it looks like we're going with recording people reading the ruleset. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (@treasuror, @promotor) [proposal] basic scoring

> On Jan 24, 2022, at 9:34 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Further, if it's trying to take into account past-only but forcing the > assessor to calculate "instantaneous" results (e.g. the assessor has to > calculate whether something would pass at every given moment) seems

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (@treasuror, @promotor) [proposal] basic scoring

> On Jan 23, 2022, at 10:02 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Yup, and if more than one person have that idea and all change at about > the same time, the proposal might fail - that's part of the fun of it... > (at least, that strategy was by design in my mind, it's possible

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Outside assistance

> On Jan 23, 2022, at 8:52 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business > wrote: > > Proposal: Outside assistance > (AI = 4) > > Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is A Nomic) by replacing "players" with > "persons". > > [Explicitly avoids the interpretation suggested on CFJ 8591 that > the "players making

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Splat Market] Order Book

…oops, please disregard that completely empty reply. What I meant to say was: Guess I should start tracking the order book again, shouldn’t I? Gaelan > On Jan 13, 2022, at 12:02 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > >> On Jan 12, 2022, at 4:55 PM, Falsifian via agora-b

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Splat Market] Order Book

> On Jan 12, 2022, at 4:55 PM, Falsifian via agora-business > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 03:30:48PM -0700, Gaelan Steele via agora-official > wrote: >> The following orders (as defined by the Splat Market contract) exist: >> >> Victory

Re: DIS: Proto: PodNomic Correspondent

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 6:54 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion > wrote: > > The "may" should be a "CAN". Otherwise lgtm. Bah! I’ve been away for too long. Gaelan

Re: DIS: Proto: PodNomic Correspondent

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 1:30 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > wrote: > > PodNomic is a new podcast-based nomic in which me, Jason, and Rose, among > others I may have forgotten, are participating in. Oh, and some links for anyone curious about PodNomic: The rules

DIS: Proto: PodNomic Correspondent

PodNomic is a new podcast-based nomic in which me, Jason, and Rose, among others I may have forgotten, are participating in. There’s a proposed rule there that calls for other nomics to appoint correspondents, who submit reports of recent happenings to be aired on the podcast. The proposal, if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: humble agoran farmer makes more deals

> On Oct 8, 2021, at 8:13 PM, Sarah S. via agora-discussion > wrote: > > I think the contract still works without you being a party to it Pretty sure it doesn’t: [Rule 1742/23, in part] A party to a contract CAN perform any of the following actions as explicitly and

DIS: [Proto] Independence Day

 [This is a draft based on our team’s Survivor entry. It’s a bit rough, not sure if some of the changes I made are worth the trouble, but better to get something out there and not keep sitting on it] Title: Independence Day Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: Gaelan Co-authors: G., Telna, nix,

DIS: Timing experiment

I am sending this email with the following procedure, using my normal mail client (Apple Mail): 1. Turning off my computer's wifi connection 2. Sending this message, allowing it to sit in the Outbox, at around 10:52 AM Pacific 3. A while later, turning on my wifi I suspect this message's Date

Re: DIS: proto on datestamps

> On Jul 22, 2021, at 3:17 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > wrote: > > "credible" can relate to the sender as well: "wait e's done that > really suspicious timing thing 3 times now." Hmm, this has potential to retroactively fail actions if evidence comes to light that the time stamps

DIS: Re: BUS: Slightly Inefficient Blot Removal Acquisition

> On Jul 4, 2021, at 8:32 PM, Telna via agora-business > wrote: > > On 2021-07-05 10:57, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: >> I create the following promise in the Library's possession: { >> Cashing conditions: The bearer has transferred to Gaelan, in the sa

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Propopsal] Glitter is too valuable

> On Jun 30, 2021, at 7:53 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion > wrote: > > By precedent, that list item is not a paragraph, just a part of one. > Also, first person in proposals is weird, but probably works. I think this would work as intended—it may use the term unconventionally, but it’s

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract & Promise Cleanup

> On Jun 25, 2021, at 1:39 PM, ATMunn via agora-business > wrote: > > On 6/18/2021 11:50 AM, ATMunn wrote: >> I intend, without 2 objections, to terminate the contract "Contract No. 1: >> GIFT". > > Having received no objections, I do so. >> I intend, without 2 objections, to terminate the

Re: DIS: [Proto] Ribbons are not switches

> On Jun 16, 2021, at 10:05 PM, Rebecca Lee via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Ribbons being switches is very dumb. Read this sentence and weep: "For each > type of Ribbon, Ribbon Ownership is a secured negative boolean > person switch, tracked by the Tailor in eir monthly report.". It makes

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [@Referee] What is the Unit of Flotation?

> On Jun 15, 2021, at 8:47 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On 16/06/2021 03:34, Telna via agora-business wrote: >> I Point my Finger at Trigon for not tracking the Unit of Flotation in eir >> weekly report as directed by Rule 2635 "Floating Rate Fleet". > > Is failure to track

Re: DIS: [proto] The Firm

> On Jun 13, 2021, at 3:24 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion > wrote: > > No risk for the bottom-most employee, then, though e may still sit out a > strike if e prefers the post-failure Org Chart to the post-success one. Nothing to lose but your chains, I suppose. Gaelan

Re: DIS: [proto] The Firm

> On Jun 11, 2021, at 10:11 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Proto: The Firm As I said on Discord, the idea looks fun. > [A change in the way vote cards lead to votes] > > Enact a Rule, "The Firm" (Power 2), with this text: > The Firm is a secured ordered list of

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: humble agoran farmer something something TIME MACHINES

> On Jun 9, 2021, at 3:25 PM, Cuddle Beam via agora-business > wrote: > > { > Scenario A: A player has taken over the economy since April 16 2021 and at > least four days ago.In this scenario, I grant the bearer a victory card. If > I do not have any victory cards, I instead create 3 blots

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8561-8572

> On Jun 8, 2021, at 9:17 AM, ais523 via agora-business > wrote: > > I intend, with 2 Agoran Consent, to make this proposal democratic. I support. Gaelan

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Pending is not Co-authorship

> On Jun 5, 2021, at 7:15 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > > the Promotor aren't you…

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Determinacy is a Good Thing

> On Jun 5, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > > I submit the following proposal. > > -Aris > --- > Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing > Adoption index: 1.7 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > [Note that Gaelan's win should have been processed by the time > this

DIS: Re: [CFJ] BUS: CFJ 3907 Judged PARADOXICAL

> On Jun 5, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business > wrote: > > CFJ, barring Gaelan: For the purposes of R2553, CFJ 3907 is about the > effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a change in the gamestate. The fact that I violated the rules has a direct impact on the

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Gauntlet announcement patch

> On Jun 4, 2021, at 2:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business > wrote: > > I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal: > > Title: Gauntlet announcement patch > > Adoption index: 2.0 > > Author: Jason > > Coauthors: > > { > > Amend Rule 2644 (The Gauntlet) to read, in whole: > > {

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Emergency Regulation Clarification

> On Jun 4, 2021, at 1:28 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business > wrote: > > Title: Emergency Regulation Clarification The proposal seems fine, ofc, but this reminds me: do we even want emergency regulations? They just seem like a huge pile of very flammable scam fuel (as G. et all so helpfully

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Anti-AI escalation

> On Jun 4, 2021, at 9:17 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business > wrote: > > Amend rule 1950 by appending the following to the first paragraph: " If > a referendum has an adoption index less than the adoption index of its > associated proposal, the referendum's adoption index is immediately set

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Crime & Punishment

> On May 23, 2021, at 5:47 PM, ATMunn via agora-business > wrote: > > On 5/23/2021 7:59 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-official wrote: >> PENDING FINGERS (do

DIS: Re: BUS: @Referee I did a crime!

> On May 2, 2021, at 9:15 AM, Falsifian via agora-business > wrote: > > I Point my Finger at myself for failing to publish a weekly report as > Editor of the Agoran Press contract for the week of April 19-25, 2021. > > Relevent text: > >> The Editor is the recordkeepor for Credits. The

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Registrar] Deregistrations of Inactive Players

> On May 1, 2021, at 3:43 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > >> I intend, without 3 objections, to deregister Nathan. > > Without 3 objections, I do so. This fails, as Nathan just became active. Gaelan

Re: DIS: [Proto] Players, Past and Present

> On Apr 10, 2021, at 10:40 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > It's a bit weird that to get a comprehensive list of all current and > former players, one has to consult two different reports. I've fixed > that by adding information on the registration dates of former players

Re: DIS: (no subject)

I support. (Seriously, looks fine, showed up as a reply) > On Apr 9, 2021, at 4:22 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On 4/9/21 11:11 PM, reuben.sta...@gmail.com wrote: >> sorry but i need to do more email testing > > It *looks* like it worked on my end but I would like to know if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [RWO Intent] 25000 coins

Right, I misread. (/me wonders if we need rules about obfuscated non-objections) Gaelan > On Apr 8, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On 4/8/21 7:53 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: >> Er, my mail client says Jason objected on

DIS: Re: BUS: [RWO Intent] 25000 coins

Er, my mail client says Jason objected on April 2, 10 PM PDT in a message to BUS. > On Apr 8, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Trigon via agora-business > wrote: > > On 4/2/21 11:07 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote: >> RWO might not work, but this is important enough to try. >> I intend to ratify

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Re: [Arbitor] Voting on the Indictment of Cuddlebeam

> On Apr 3, 2021, at 6:31 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business > wrote: > > > >> On Apr 3, 2021, at 6:29 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business >> wrote: >> >> I find G. guilty of violating Rule 2168/9 by Being Too Polite. I levy a fine

Re: DIS: [Proto] Archimedes' Principle

> On Apr 3, 2021, at 3:20 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Title: Archimedes' Principle > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): Trigon, nix > > > [Changes: > -The Treasuror sets a target for the Total Buoyancy every week; > the most recent target takes

DIS: CFJ 3901 draft-judged PARADOXICAL

At question is a promise that purports to recursively create and cash a promise with identical text, causing G's vote on proposal 8543 to fluctuate indefinitely between two values. # What does it mean to cash a promise? 2618/2: { A promise's bearer CAN, by announcement, cash the promise,

DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] We care after the first time

> On Mar 19, 2021, at 12:17 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business > wrote: > > { > > Amend Rule 2465, "Victory by Apathy", by replacing the final "." > character with the following: ", except for those who have won the game > through this Rule in the past 14 days." > > } This is an important

DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Election

I become a candidate. (Jason also seems perfectly qualified; I’m assuming from this message e isn’t interested in keeping the role long term?) Gaelan > On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official > wrote: > > As Referee, I initiate an election for Referee. > > -- > Jason

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3901 Assigned to Gaelan

> On Mar 7, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official > wrote: > > The below CFJ is 3901. I assign it to Gaelan. > > status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3901 > > > === CFJ

DIS: Re: OFF: [Ministor] Focus Report

> On Mar 4, 2021, at 6:43 PM, nix via agora-official > wrote: > > Legislation (4): ATMunn, Gaelan, Jason, Trigon I grant myself a legislative card by announcement. Gaelan

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: (@notary, @assessor) A vote, a promise, and a [cfj]

The minimal fix would be to prevent promises from cashing promises created after they began to be cashed—that would allow promises to create and cash promises, just not recursively. Gaelan > On Feb 28, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business > wrote: > > > On 2/28/2021 3:58 PM,

DIS: Re: BUS: Judiciary Four Thousand (contest)

> On Feb 26, 2021, at 8:38 PM, Falsifian via agora-business > wrote: > > for i in [1-9][1-9]*; do sed -nE "s/.*[Cc]alled.*((19|20)[0-9][0-9]).*/$i > \\1/p" "$i" | sed 1q; done | sort -k2nr -k 1n | awk 'BEGIN { y=2021; printf(" > CFJ |800 |1600 |2400 |3200 |4000");

DIS: Re: BUS: [@Treasuror] Possible Wealth Accumulation

Update: I did; this fails. > On Feb 21, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business > wrote: > > I wield the wealth stone, specifying myself. > > [This may fail; I don't remember if I already did so this week. We're very > near the end of the week, so I'm sending

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] You CAN, CAN'T You?

> On Feb 20, 2021, at 11:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > > I submit the following proposal. > > -Aris > --- > Title: You CAN, CAN'T You? > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: > > > [Currently, there are a bunch of CANs without a method that thus fail.] > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Draft judgement of CFJ 3899

> On Feb 16, 2021, at 5:50 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 8:46 PM Falsifian via agora-business > wrote: >> >> I file a motion to extend CFJ 3899. >> >> Here is my draft. Could anyone point me to precedent about what it >> means for information

DIS: Re: BUS: [Promise] Guess That Agoran!

Some thoughts: I think it's safe to assume this person wants this to be an interesting puzzle, not impossible, so I doubt e tried to actively insert red herrings, so I'm inclined to believe that anything that seems like a valid clue probably is. The Date: header is in UTC-8. The message looks

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Emergency] [Proposal Distribution] Dictator Dethronement

> On Feb 7, 2021, at 7:23 AM, ATMunn via agora-business > wrote: > > On 2/3/2021 10:16 AM, ATMunn wrote: >> I intend, with 3 Agoran Consent, to repeal all existing Emergency >> Regulations. > > Having received support from Jason and no objections, I do so. > > -- > ATMunn > friendly

DIS: Re: BUS: a hobbit-style birthday

> On Feb 3, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business > wrote: > > > It is my 20th Agoran birthday!! > > Unfortunately, just for me, the discord wizards discovered a day or so > back that the birthday rule is broken, can you spot the missing text? > >>During a player's Agoran

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] All Good Things Must Come to an End

I support each intent. > On Feb 3, 2021, at 12:28 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > > I submit the following proposal. For N from 2 to 5, I intend with N > support to certify this proposal (that is, cause it to become > pending). > > Justification for certification: The current

DIS: Re: BUS: Agorans for a Democratic Society [attn. Notary]

I consent and join this contract. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 2, 2021, at 8:50 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business > wrote: > > I agree to and become a member of the following contract. > > { > Agorans for a Democratic Society > > Aris CAN, by announcement, nominate a specified player

DIS: Re: BUS: Order Book Maintenance

I don't think you do, but hey, it converges the gamestate in case I screwed up any record keeping. Gaelan > On Feb 2, 2021, at 6:21 PM, ATMunn via agora-business > wrote: > > On 2/2/2021 7:35 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: >> I destroy all my orders on the Spla

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3893 Assigned to Gaelan

> On Jan 22, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official > wrote: > > The below CFJ is 3893. I assign it to Gaelan. > > status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3893 > > === CFJ 3893 === > > There

Re: DIS: [Proto] The Great Rollback

> On Jan 28, 2021, at 12:55 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > wrote: > > > >> On Jan 27, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion >> wrote: >> >>> Unless I’m missing something, this repeals the definition of instrume

Re: DIS: [Proto] The Great Rollback

> On Jan 27, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > >> Unless I’m missing something, this repeals the definition of instruments and >> adds a new one. > > That's intentional, yes. Instruments would fill the hole that statutes do now. Bah, I meant to say that it

Re: DIS: [Proto] The Great Rollback

> On Jan 27, 2021, at 12:02 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > wrote: > > The time has come for us to undo Statutory Instrumentation and return > to the noble design of the past. Comments are, as always, welcome, > even if I can't promise I'll agree with them. :) > > -Aris > > --- >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >