On 4/17/23 18:30, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> New version. Fixed most things people mentioned in response to the
> previous version, plus changed a bit how the thing works.
>
> Now, instead of Golems activating by themselves and acting on behalf of
> people, we have players activating the
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Stone fixes
Author: Jason
Coauthors: nix
Adoption index: 2.0
{
# Convergence of P8868
If Rule 2642 is not titled "Gathering Stones", retitle to "Gathering
Stones".
If Rule 2642 does not have the following text, amend it to read, in
whole:
{
A
On 11/13/22 18:15, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows (and have updated the spreadsheet):
>
>> 8866* Jason, Aspen3.0 Restricted confederation
> PRESENT (what about groups that were already grouped before, but then
> the members explicitly decide/declare
On 11/13/22 00:37, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> VOTING STRENGTHS
>
>
> Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
> ^: player has voting strength 6
Correction: the Dream of Power should give 2 voting strength, rather than 3.
This doesn't change any outcomes and is not
On 10/30/22 19:22, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> I've been working on a redesign of the website in my free time. Here it
> is: https://nixnull.github.io/agoranomic.github.io/index.html'
Oh whoops I never responded to this.
Above all, thank you for doing this!
> This set up switches away
On 10/23/22 18:50, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> EXPERIMENT 00056 RULE SELECTION
This should be 00057, my bad.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 10/16/22 23:00, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> 2022-09-04 21:10:47 Jason Sabotage 1
> 2022-09-04 21:10:47 Jason Wealth1
Whoops, these shouldn't have been included.
I don't think this makes anything fail.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Mad
On 10/16/22 16:32, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> [I don't know how this slipped past me, I'm sorry. This is late but
> still required, and the decision has met quorum now.]
>
> I hereby issue a humiliating public reminder to the following slackers
> who have not voted on the referendum on
I'm sorry to bring this up again, but I don't think this was
sufficiently addressed after recent events.
Rule 478 still attempts to grant unlimited freedom of speech rights to
players over all fora. This is obviously broken for foreign fora, but
it's unclear what (if anything) should be done for
On 9/12/22 23:18, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 12, 2022, at 10:14 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/12/22 22:31, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>>>> On Sep 12, 2022
On 9/12/22 22:31, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2022, at 9:12 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 9/12/22 20:31, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>>> There's also the clause in Rule 2630 "The Administrative State": &q
On 9/12/22 20:31, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> There's also the clause in Rule 2630 "The Administrative State": "An
> officer SHALL NOT violate eir office's administrative regulations in the
> discharge of eir office." It's not too relevant to this case, but there may
> be an issue
On 9/10/22 11:25, Sarah S. via agora-discussion wrote:
> Create the following power 0.1 rule entitled "Agora's values".
> edits/additions entirely welcome, i'm not the best writer at all.
>
> {{Nothing in this rule creates a legal obligation.
>
> Since Agora's founding over 30 years ago, Agorans
On 9/3/22 03:21, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> I vote FOR all. (They had been warned for this behavior previously,
> multiple times. When we hear an apology we can change our minds then, but I
> don't want them to be able to play again before we are ALL ready. )
>
> On Fri, Sep 2,
On 8/30/22 12:41, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> (I'm not sure where discussions are, but I think something needs to be done
> right now. A proposal will take some time to pass anyways, but at least it
> will be something to look towards as this unravels.
>
> If you are neutral in
On 8/29/22 13:23, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> We now have a player who is directly responsible for three FAGEs. I
> believe that it's time we discuss a mechanism similar to the one below.
Correction on this: directly responsible for one successful FAGE and one
attempte
We now have a player who is directly responsible for three FAGEs. I
believe that it's time we discuss a mechanism similar to the one below.
Title: Unfortunately
Author: Jason
Coauthors:
Adoption index: 3.0
{
Amend Rule 869 by appending the following paragraph:
{
Banned is a secured negative
On 8/21/22 18:10, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Jason
>
>> I respond to each petition that I am required to respond to as follows:
>> "No. For more information please reread this response.".
> Proto: Don't.
No.
--
Jason Cobb
Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 8/16/22 12:05, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 8/16/22 10:20, Rose Strong via agora-business wrote:
>> I CFJ: The Militia Court created by Madrid is a valid alternative to the
>> current CFJ system.
>
> The above is CFJ 3985.
>
> I assign CFJ 3985 to Murphy.
>
The above is actually
On 8/15/22 22:39, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> Nitpicks:
>
>> The Spivak pronouns (e/em/eir) are hereby recognized as the standard
>> third-person singular personal pronouns in Agora. In official contexts,
>> players SHOULD use them when referring to non-specific persons or, in
>>
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:18 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I vote FOR on all proposals up for voting this period. (I have not updated
> the spreadsheet, sorry.)
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2022, 3:59 PM Edward
> Murphy via agora-business wrote:
>
> > >
On 7/24/22 20:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 12:56 AM secretsnail9 via agora-official
> wrote:
>> 8821~ nix, Jason, secretsnail 3.0 More Intuitive Rule Changes
> Opinion of the rulekeepor sought:
>
> In all previous history, the phrase:
>
> "Retitle rule
On 7/24/22 18:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Pseudo-coe: I think this is missing the Cfj called by snail with the
> subject line [Proposal?]. If so and it’s not taken I favor that one. -G.
>
Acknowledged and assigned, thank you.
--
Jason Cobb
Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor,
On 7/16/22 03:09, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> It discusses shorthand which I almost used exactly and discusses what the
>>> shorthand could mean,
>> No it doesn't. It
On 7/15/22 22:02, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> But this is still only one issue you've addressed: you can still totally
> create something that already exists, you just make it exist again,
> duplicating it. Arbitrarily restricting creation to things that don't exist
> is atextual
On 7/11/22 19:24, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 3:26 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:55 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
>> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/10/22
On 7/7/22 19:04, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 18:56 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 7/5/22 13:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>>> Repeal Rule 2618 (Promises).
>>>
>>> Repeal Rule 1742 (Contra
On 7/8/22 00:03, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> As it has no mention
On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was necessary to
> include an interpretation where a tabled action must be rules-defined as an
> action able to be performed with one of those methods. But looking at Rule
> 2125
On 7/5/22 13:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I don't think we do. Let's discuss some options.
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {
> Title: Option A
> Adoption index: 2.2
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-authors:
>
> Repeal Rule 2618 (Promises).
>
> }
>
> I submit the following
On 7/7/22 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> That is, fulfilling these requirements in order to take the action by
> announcement IS performing the action "with support", making it a tabled
> action. The same applies to all tabled action methods.
> So what's left to answer is if
On 7/3/22 18:09, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing "qualifies for" with "earns" in
> the methods of obtaining these types of Ribbon: Green (G), Platinum (P),
> Lime (L), Transparent (T).
Qualification is for continuous conditions while earns is for
On 7/3/22 14:11, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> (I want a complex subgame, for that, I think we need
> to start with setting some sort of substrate for it.
> I generally endorse further modification of the following.)
>
> I submit the following proposal:
> {
> Title: Rock Paper
On 7/2/22 00:04, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> When a stone is cascaded, the Rule defining that stone applies the effects in
> that stone's scroll.
This doesn't work due to power.
--
Jason Cobb
Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022, 9:39 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I intend to clean, each without objection, each of the following:
> correct the spelling of 'statment' in Rule 2471 "No Faking" to 'statement'
> correct the spelling of 'niether' in Rule 2661
On 6/21/22 17:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/21/2022 10:34 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 08:19 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> I don't agree with this interpretation. There are quite a few examples of
>>> using "wrong"
On 6/15/22 03:13, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
> {
> Title: Fix typo in Points
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: 4st
> Co-author(s):
> Amend the rule "Points" by changing the sentence
> "If a least one player wins the game via such an
> announcement,
On 6/13/22 20:55, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> The Winds Died Down recently, beginning the procedure described in R2658.
> As found in CFJ 3966, the process was begun even if some of the steps
> couldn't be completed. As far as I can tell, nothing blocked the repeals
> in (1) from
On 6/13/22 16:51, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
> {
> Title: Ministry of Vagabonds
> Adoption Index: 1.0
> Author: 4st
> Co-author(s): nix, Madrid, secretsnail9, Jason
As written, this proposal does nothing or something close to it. It
would need to
On 6/6/22 19:39, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 18:36 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
>> ID Author(s) AITitle
>> ---
> I vote as follows:
>> 8682& secretsnail
On 5/31/22 21:50, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> These definitions lead to at least three different reasonable possibilities
> I can see:
>
> The initiator of the device is the one who started it, or proposed it. (The
> "special rites" of proposing the device fit nicely here.)
>
> The
On 5/30/22 21:02, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> So it's more unclear, and potentially ambiguous, which would just make
> deactivation fail. Also, that CFJ didn't address the contradiction of being
> able to activate the device while it's already on.
The only communication standard
On 5/30/22 17:23, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> After the first device assignment, "the Device changes, following which
> each active player gains 1 card of each type and eir grant (if any)". What
> does it mean for the device to change? We actually have a definition for a
> device
On 5/1/22 23:09, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Any suggestions? I'm partial to changing "As this title..." to "As this
> Device...", but maybe you have a better idea.
FOR
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 4/30/22 10:34, nix via agora-official wrote:
> We missed award season, which was this month. As Herald, I take
> responsibility. However, I believe I have a solution. Through
> regulations, I can grant untimed authorization to the officers to award
> the titles. I request these officers
On 4/18/22 11:57, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> I vote FOR in both referenda.
Not to the public forum.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 4/11/22 13:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of
>> judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent
>> exists. Generally
On 4/11/22 08:46, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> It should be clear enough. It's in a thread concerning a single proposal.
> Also, it directly answers a comment regarding that proposal. Also, I only
> have one proposal up. I'd argue it's unambiguous.
>
> On April 10, 2022 11:41:31 PM
On 4/8/22 14:05, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:54 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit, but do not pend, the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: No finger pointing on behalf
> FWIW, I'd prefer to expand the set of actions-on-behalf rather than
>
On 4/8/22 14:21, Madrid via agora-discussion wrote:
> Ive been looking into mailbots for officerless game tracking.
>
> If Contracts/Acting on Behalf gets repealed I'm up for using the same tech
> for bots that can replace it.
>
> Actually, they could be useful too for secret "contracts",
On 4/5/22 18:10, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-04-05 at 18:07 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 4/5/22 18:03, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 00:00 +0200, nethack4.org dicebot via agor
On 4/5/22 18:03, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 00:00 +0200, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> This is an automated selection of a random rule from Agora's ruleset,
>> as part of the Mad Engineer's weekly duties.
>> Randomizing from 145 rules.
> This
On 4/4/22 10:30, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> I create six copies of the following promise, named "Promise me", and
> transfer them to the Library:
> {{{
> Cashing condition: In the message in which e cashes this promise, the
> bearer transfers me a promise with text "For each tabled intent
On 4/3/22 21:21, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2022-04-03 20:10, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> CoE: either none of these Snailpoints exist, or they are all owned by
>> the Lost and Found Department. Any purported creation of Snailpoints
>> would result in their ownership being
On 4/3/22 11:07, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> On 4/3/2022 8:04 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Ministor's Monthly Report for 03 April 2022
>>
>> Focus Switches (self-ratifies)
>>
>> Compliance (3):
>>Madrid, ais523,
On 3/27/22 20:07, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 02:05 +0200, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> The dice roll was: 124
>> This is R2629, Victory Auctions.
> Another duplicate. For reference, again:
> {{{
>The Treasuror CAN conduct an auction (a
On 3/27/22 17:39, Trigon via agora-official wrote:
>Contract(00) cn wcjclcvcwsbgpdvt
> == ==
> ATMStash [0] 17538 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> CB Locker [1]
Drafted this on discord, there was some disagreement about whether this
was a good idea at all, but I think this wording fixes the identified
problems:
Amend Rule 2449 by appending the following paragraphs:
{
The above notwithstanding, persons do not win the game if conduct in
violation of the
On 3/24/22 17:37, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 17:28 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I transfer all of my win cards and winsomes to ais523 for the sole
>> purpose of depositing them into Obstructive Pooling.
> Just to confirm, is this 1 Win Card and 3
On 3/21/22 20:15, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 01:12 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> Assignment of dice rolls to rules:
>> 106:R2579; 107:R2581; 108:R2582; 109:R2585; 110:R2603; 111:R2605;
> [I added a special case in the randomization
On 3/23/22 12:38, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: The Hexeract
> AI: 1.0
> Author: secretsnail
> Coauthors:
>
> Create a rule with title "Grids" and the following text:
> {
>
> A grid has D dimensions, where D is a positive integer, and where
On 3/16/22 18:09, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> El 16/03/2022 a las 22:05, Jason Cobb via agora-official escribió:
>> Hot Potato gain 8 coins if transferred to a player who has not
>> owned the stone since the last time Agora owned it.
>> Escape risk:
On 3/13/22 16:13, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> Power Jason2021-10-04
Correction: the Power Stone was wielded by Jason on 2022-03-08. This
will be reflected in future reports.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 3/6/22 20:28, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 7:13 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> If I send an email to your email address, but all of your devices are
>> offline for the 4 da
On 3/6/22 20:10, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> In the usual case I would have been emailed or messaged in some way which
> means I would be able to see the message. I was offline the whole time this
> message was unedited. It can't be to me if it never reached me at any point.
If I
This is a proto to re-establish foreign relations. PodNomic (a podcast
about nomics that is also a nomic) had a system where other nomics could
appoint correspondents who could submit news items, which would be
included in the podcast (this was recently repealed but would probably
be re-enacted if
On 3/1/22 00:41, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> I would strongly suggest that this only restrict rule changes in the
>>> minimal modification, and not any later changes following logically from
>>> it. Otherwise the discrepancies between the intuitive interpretation of
>>>
On 2/28/22 22:11, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> I present the following draft to clean up the ratification rule.
>>
>> The only intended semantic change is securing all retroactive
>>
I present the following draft to clean up the ratification rule.
The only intended semantic change is securing all retroactive
modification, everything else is just mean to make the existing text
much more clear.
Title: Temporal Incursion Modification and Exclusion Act
Author: Jason
Coauthors:
On 2/20/22 20:49, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-02-21 at 02:47 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> The dice roll was: 41
>> This is R2137, The Assessor.
> For reference:
> {{{
> The Assessor is an office; its holder is responsible for
>
On 2/8/22 15:28, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/8/2022 15:16, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>> Well it looks like we're going with recording people reading the ruleset.
>>
>> Reading will be done using the Short Logical Ruleset published on 8 Feb
>> 2022, which has 146 rules.
>>
On 2/2/22 14:18, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 14:07 -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Title: Deputisation rwrite
> I'd prefer to go down a bit of a different path – I agree with barring
> deputisation for very old duties, but think t
Title: Deputisation rwrite
Author: Jason
Coauthors: G.
Adoption index: 3.0
{
Amend Rule 2160 ("Deputisation") by replacing the sole list with the
following:
{
1. the rules require the holder of that office, by virtue of holding
that office, to perform the action (this requirement is fulfilled
On 2/1/22 16:38, Rose Strong via agora-discussion wrote:
> Unless I am completely misunderstanding the CFJ 3938 ruling a quorum can
> never be 1.
>
That's under the current rules, due to the clause that would be changed
here. There's nothing inherently saying quorum can't be 1, that's just
what
On 1/31/22 17:08, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> The R2175/9 methods noted above cause something to "cease being a cfj".
> But it's not clear that this "destroys" it as an "entity". It could
> easily be called a "former cfj" and continue to exist. Furthermore, even
> if a cfj is
Read the Ruleset Week approaches once more.
On Discord, there was some discussion of making a recording of the SLR
being read, in the spirit of PodNomic. I'm happy to coordinate this if
there's the will to do it.
If that's not preferred, I'm don't have any better ideas than running a
contest.
On 1/26/22 17:02, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> On 1/26/2022 1:47 PM, Rose Strong via agora-business wrote:
>> I support.
> With 2 support, I group-file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3938.
>
> Gratuitous arguments:
>
> CFJs on the ratification of playerhood without consent:
>
>
On 1/24/22 22:28, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>
>> I create the following proposal, then pay a fee of one pendant to cause
>> it to become pending.
>>
>> Title: Auction Self-Ratification
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author:
On 1/23/22 16:53, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-23 at 13:49 -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> * Having submitted an unconditional ballot AGAINST a referendum to
>> adopt a sponsored proposal, provided that the ballot is valid at
>> the
On 1/21/22 11:38, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> I temporarily deputise for the Arbitor to recuse Madrid from CFJ 3938.
>
> I point a finger at Madrid for failing to judge this cfj in a timely
> fashion, as per R591. I wouldn't do this normally, but e favored it so it
> seems like
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 2:12 PM ais523 via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> The Device is on.
>
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause rule 2655 to amend the rule
> "The Device" by appending the following as a list item to the "When the
> device is off:" list:
> {{{
>
On 1/5/22 12:31, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> That's definitely interesting on its own (irrespective of the device) I'd
> forgotten all entities have voting strength though can't cast ballots.
> Furthermore, it's not clear to me (at all) that R683 precludes
> lower-powered rules from
On 1/2/22 21:52, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> El 03/01/2022 a las 02:10, Aspen via agora-business escribió:
>> Last year, there were a few days that held great personal significance
>> for me. As of the 13th of September, I had been a player for five
>> years. Just over a month later, on
On 12/28/21 05:22, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 11:21 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
> business wrote:
>> The dice roll was: 27
>> This is R1681, The Logical Rulesets.
> For reference:
> {{{
> The Short Logical Ruleset (SLR) is a format of the ruleset.
On 12/20/21 15:50, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> An entity submits a ballot on an Agoran decision by publishing a
> notice satisfying the following conditions:
>
> 1. The ballot is submitted during the voting period for the
> decision.
>
> 2.
On 12/17/21 08:30, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote:
> Create a power-1 rule, titled “Foreign Bureaux”, with the following text: {
> PodNomic Correspondent is an office.
>
> For the purposes of PodNomic, Agora Nomic’s PodNomic Corespondent is the
> holder of the office PodNomic
On 12/7/21 21:53, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:18:28PM +, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
>> El 06/12/2021 a las 18:51, ais523 via agora-discussion escribió:
>>> On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 19:48 +0100, nethack4.org dicebot via agora-
>>> business wrote:
On 11/21/21 00:00, Aspen via agora-business wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:13 PM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/21 14:36, Aspen via agora-official wrote:
>>> CONTAINS A REVISED PROMOTOR'S REPORT, EFFECTIVE AS OF RIGHT NOW.
>>>
>>> I hereby
On 11/3/21 19:45, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2021, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
>
>> THE BILLBOARD ROCK CHART (STONEMASON'S WEEKLY REPORT)
>> Summary of stone functions:
> This summary seems to miss the new stones.
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
It does sorry.
I've set up a self-hosted zulip server for testing. I've never run or
used zulip before, so I can't guarantee that it will be stable and I
can't guarantee that I won't have to wipe the whole thing (though I'll
try hard not to, now that there's a little bit of actual stuff on it).
There is, of
On 10/31/21 20:59, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 17:47 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> The self-destruct timer is hard to resist:
>>>The time window of a device is W days, where W is the value
>>>explicitly stated by the device, or 60 if the
On 10/18/21 12:16, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 10/18/2021 9:11 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 10/18/21 06:18, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> We fixed the case where a proposal might be applied twice:
>>
>>> 4. (if the
On 10/18/21 06:18, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 21:43 -0400, Jason Cobb wrote (to
> m...@agoranomic.groups.io):
>> RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 8607-8629
>> =
> CoE: You did this already, to agora-official.
>
> (I don't think there's anything
This message contains no game actions.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 10/7/21 22:29, Ørjan Johansen via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Here's a proto to not erase player's festivity when they win by ribbons:
>>
>> Amend Rule 2438 by appending the following to the paragraph begi
Here's a proto to not erase player's festivity when they win by ribbons:
Amend Rule 2438 by appending the following to the paragraph beginning "For each
type of Ribbon":
{
Laudability is a person switch with non-negative integer possible values,
defaulting to 0, tracked by the
On 10/6/21 19:27, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> Power G.40% EEscapes
Whoops, this is Jason's stone. I don't think this affects anything.
--
Jason Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
On 10/5/21 22:22, Shy Owl via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Yeah, you definitely shouldn't blot yourself.
>> --
>> R. Lee
> I'm pleased that it's possible though.
>
> Seems that that sentence wasn't intended to be
> used for self-blotting, but I like that I can.
>
> Seems appropriate somehow.
>
> --
On 10/5/21 05:48, Shy Owl via agora-discussion wrote:
> Hi I believe I have found a citation error in the current FLR.
>
> In the annotations for Rule 1742/23, CFJ 3869 is listed as:
>
> {
>
> CFJ 3869 (called 18 Jul 2020): A contract cannot automatically create
> another contract, because the
On 10/4/21 14:25, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
>> 8612& Jason, G., Ørjan1.0 Tournament Conclusion Fixes v2
> AGAINST. It's a reasonable limit, and this tournament was abandoned as
> evidenced by the complete lack of finale activity - no win is deserved
> here (if anyone had
1 - 100 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
