Should clarify that this doesn’t include year. Like the idea.
Gaelan
> On Nov 9, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> it is
> the exact date e did so
The word players is is plural, the word eir is singular.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:02 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> -
> Title: Happy Birthday To You
> Author: Trigon
> Coauthors:
> AI: 1
>
> Enact a new rule entitled "Birthday Gifts", power=1, with the
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 2:41 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> * Having a Thesis pass peer-review and be granted a Degree based
> on its merit: 20 shinies
Apparently we call these "coins" now.
-twg
Invariably, I have made a mistake in the following proposal. So I'm
asking for contributions before submitting it.
-
Title: Reinstituting Rewards
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Coauthors:
[ COMMENT: For those of you who know that I really liked the rewards
system from last year, this shouldn't come
Once again, Ørjan is correct. I retract my most recently submitted
proposal and submit the following one:
-
Title: High-level asset verbs
AI: 3
Author: Trigon
Coauthors:
[ COMMENT: This terminology is ripped from the coins rule and applies to
all assets. I really like this one. ]
Amend R
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Is this really what you want?
Gaelan
On Nov 1, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or
more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were
levied on em for ei
Is this really what you want?
Gaelan
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> 2. For each office, if a single player held that office for 16 or
> more days in the previous month and no unforgivable fines were
> levied on em for eir conduct in that office during tha
Retracting doesn't un-pend it, it removes it from the proposal pool. See
rule 2350, the last paragraph:
"The author of a proposal in the Proposal Pool CAN remove (syn. retract,
withdraw) it from the Pool by announcement."
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 00:17 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Pending’s gone, so can
Pending’s gone, so can you retract?
Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Right you are, Ørjan. I retract the two proposals I have most recently
> submitted and instead submit the following two:
>
> -
> Title: Only proposals should be distributed
> AI: 1
> Author
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
Repeal Rule 2505 "Distributing Assets".
That should be 2515.
Amend Rule 1728 "Dependent Actions" by:
replacing the following:
2. If the action is to be performed Without N Objections, With N
Agoran Consent, or With Notice, if the in
10 matches
Mail list logo