Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Flair

2013-08-07 Thread comex
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 7 August 2013 22:57, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: (The precise definition of text is generally left to the Registrar's discretion, but should be conservative; no emoji.) Please just allow

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Flair

2013-08-07 Thread Elliott Hird
On 8 August 2013 00:29, comex com...@gmail.com wrote: The quoted paragraph is intended to be explicitly mostly silent on the matter, only using emoji as an example. Em⭕️ji is annoying, but so is z̸̨̜͈̦̹̜͕̥͈̱̟̙̰͍͈̻̠̩̝͈͝a̵̱̳̣̗̳̣͍̭̣̝̲̠͚̤̞͢͠ͅl̨̨̢̙̫̣̖̭̖͍̦̞̠̹͞g̢̛̻͇̜̙̟̗̲͇̬̫͘̕o͔͇̺͎͍̞̦͖̥͔̝̕͢͟ͅ,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Flair

2013-08-07 Thread omd
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: I don't see why we should care about this in flair but nowhere else. It seems completely irrelevant to me. Well... we have CFJs and proposals, which naturally go out of circulation after a limited amount of