'kay. How about I just publish my report and fix the problem tomorrow and
we don't worry about it?
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018, 19:39 Rebecca wrote:
> Cartographer's note section doesn't work to mark something disputed unless
> there's some indication of disputation like a ! mark in the report's list
Cartographer's note section doesn't work to mark something disputed unless
there's some indication of disputation like a ! mark in the report's list
itself. Otherwise the report is internally inconsistent and doesn't
self-ratify.
(note I haven't actually checked whether this is the case here)
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 5:26 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Corona wrote:
>
> > Sorry! I withdraw my CoE.
>
> Is that actually possible? I don't see anything in my copy of the Ruleset
> allowing it, but that's from June 6...
>
> Greetings,
> Ørjan.
>
Not legally, but by custom.
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, Corona wrote:
Sorry! I withdraw my CoE.
Is that actually possible? I don't see anything in my copy of the Ruleset
allowing it, but that's from June 6...
Greetings,
Ørjan.
The Cartographor's Note section exists for a reason
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018, 15:11 Corona wrote:
> H. Cartographor, I request that the facilities owned by my zombie that were
> ratified out of existence, as noted by twg be re-ratified by including them
> in your report.
>
> I CoE this report
5 matches
Mail list logo
