Re: DIS: Re: BUS: payday fix

I tend to agree that some way of making patch proposals free is worthwhile. Writing such proposals is entirely a public service. If anything, people should be paid for them. -Aris On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:14 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On one hand several of us were

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: payday fix

On one hand several of us were proposing far more than 2 a month, especially those of us who did a lot of bug-finding - at 2 a month I'd personally save for proposals that are "interesting" rather than bug fixes. On the other hand, others of us weren't, and maybe a contract could automate

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: payday fix

We all already get 2 paper a month, so I'm worried about reintroducing without objection and making mills worthless. I'm gonna try and write a contract to coordinate the altruism but I don't know if it'll work. On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: payday fix

That is v. annoying. I'm not feeling altruistic (I mean I might once, but not against an ongoing defect in the rules) - I wonder how if people will pay for bugfixes? Anyway, I don't plan to pay to pend it - not asking anyone else to but feel free if you like :P On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Kenyon

DIS: Re: BUS: payday fix

PAoaM amends 2445 by removing Without Objection as a method of pending a proposal. Want me to pend it with paper? On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I submit the following proposal, Paydays Fix, AI-2. > > I intend to pend it without objection