Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
Assess this, declare that, dude can't take a weekend anymore Seriously though, maybe I should judge those CFJs on whether the tournament even exists first? Sorry about not getting to those, maybe tonight ( -7:00 time), definitely by tomorrow. On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > G., could you declare the winners, so that I may award the appropriate > patent titles? > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:19 PM Aris Merchant > wrote: > > > > It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only > > really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If > > it goes for three months, it's way overtime, perhaps because it's broken or > > no one is interested enough to complete the goal condition. Under those > > circumstances, I wanted it to stop automatically. The reason it shouldn't > > have been included is that there still might be players enjoying the > > tournament, and they can always terminate it by proposal. It's not actually > > a bug, and we can always fix it if it ever becomes a problem. > > > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:06 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit > > > included? > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within > > > > within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, > > > > otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner." > > > > > > > > Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) > > > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > > > > > the current rules. > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just > > > have > > > > > to > > > > > > see who wins on points... > > > > > > > > > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > > > > > deferred > > > > > > until after the PM election. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC > > > > > > > timing > > > > > which > > > > > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked > > > best > > > > > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle > > > would > > > > > > > have been best. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > > > > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius > > > > > > > > Scholasticus > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > > > > > player, > > > > > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > > > > > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius > > > Scholasticus < > > > > > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > > > > > Ambassador > > > > > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many > > > qvestion$ to > > > > > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, > > > it > > > > > must > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be > > > appointed for > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I > > > > > > > > >> > believe > > > > > that it > > > > > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each > > > Nomic, so > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the > > > > > > > > >> > foreign > > > > > Nomic. > > > > > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > > > > > Foreign > > > > > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as > > > > > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
G., could you declare the winners, so that I may award the appropriate patent titles? On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:19 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > > It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only > really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If > it goes for three months, it's way overtime, perhaps because it's broken or > no one is interested enough to complete the goal condition. Under those > circumstances, I wanted it to stop automatically. The reason it shouldn't > have been included is that there still might be players enjoying the > tournament, and they can always terminate it by proposal. It's not actually > a bug, and we can always fix it if it ever becomes a problem. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:06 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit > > included? > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant > > wrote: > > > > > > R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within > > > within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, > > > otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner." > > > > > > Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > > > > the current rules. > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just > > have > > > > to > > > > > see who wins on points... > > > > > > > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > > > > deferred > > > > > until after the PM election. > > > > > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing > > > > which > > > > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked > > best > > > > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle > > would > > > > > > have been best. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > > > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > > > > player, > > > > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > > > > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius > > Scholasticus < > > > > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > > > > Ambassador > > > > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many > > qvestion$ to > > > > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, > > it > > > > must > > > > > > be > > > > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be > > appointed for > > > > > > each > > > > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe > > > > that it > > > > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each > > Nomic, so > > > > > > that > > > > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign > > > > Nomic. > > > > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > > > > Foreign > > > > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > > > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its > > special > > > > > > historic > > > > > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If it goes for three months, it's way overtime, perhaps because it's broken or no one is interested enough to complete the goal condition. Under those circumstances, I wanted it to stop automatically. The reason it shouldn't have been included is that there still might be players enjoying the tournament, and they can always terminate it by proposal. It's not actually a bug, and we can always fix it if it ever becomes a problem. -Aris On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:06 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit > included? > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant > wrote: > > > > R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within > > within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, > > otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner." > > > > Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) > > > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > > > the current rules. > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just > have > > > to > > > > see who wins on points... > > > > > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > > > deferred > > > > until after the PM election. > > > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing > > > which > > > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked > best > > > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle > would > > > > > have been best. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > > > player, > > > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > > > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius > Scholasticus < > > > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > > > Ambassador > > > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many > qvestion$ to > > > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, > it > > > must > > > > > be > > > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be > appointed for > > > > > each > > > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe > > > that it > > > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each > Nomic, so > > > > > that > > > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign > > > Nomic. > > > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > > > Foreign > > > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its > special > > > > > historic > > > > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit included? On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > > R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within > within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, > otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner." > > Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) > > -Aris > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > > the current rules. > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > > wrote: > > > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have > > to > > > see who wins on points... > > > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > > deferred > > > until after the PM election. > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing > > which > > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best > > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would > > > > have been best. > > > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > > player, > > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > > Ambassador > > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it > > must > > > > be > > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for > > > > each > > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe > > that it > > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so > > > > that > > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign > > Nomic. > > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > > Foreign > > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special > > > > historic > > > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner." Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) -Aris On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > the current rules. > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > wrote: > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have > to > > see who wins on points... > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > deferred > > until after the PM election. > > > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing > which > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would > > > have been best. > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > player, > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > >> > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > >> > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > Ambassador > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it > must > > > be > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for > > > each > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe > that it > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so > > > that > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign > Nomic. > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > Foreign > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special > > > historic > > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under the current rules. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to > see who wins on points... > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be deferred > until after the PM election. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would > > have been best. > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > wrote: > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player, > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > >> > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > >> > > > >> ~Corona > > > >> > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > >> > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > >> > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > Ambassador > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must > > be > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for > > each > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so > > that > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic. > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special > > historic > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to see who wins on points... If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be deferred until after the PM election. -Aris On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would > have been best. > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > wrote: > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player, > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona > wrote: > > >> > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > >> > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > >> > > >> ~Corona > > >> > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > >> > > > >> > Your Honor, > > >> > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > Ambassador > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must > be > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for > each > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so > that > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic. > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special > historic > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would have been best. On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player, > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona wrote: > >> > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > >> > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > >> > >> ~Corona > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > >> > > >> > Your Honor, > >> > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of Ambassador > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must be > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for each > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so that > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic. > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special historic > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > >> > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher participation/longer time but congrats aris. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player, > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona wrote: >> >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. >> >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? >> >> ~Corona >> >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: >> > >> > Your Honor, >> > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of Ambassador >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must be >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for each >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so that >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic. >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special historic >> > status, discussed on the first docket. >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player, assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona wrote: > > > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > ~Corona > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > Your Honor, > > > > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of Ambassador > > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must be > > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for each > > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it > > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so that > > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic. > > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign > > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special historic > > status, discussed on the first docket. > >
DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
> [...] with which Agora would establish relations. You mean G.A.N. Agora? ~Corona On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > Your Honor, > > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of Ambassador > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must be > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for each > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so that > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic. > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special historic > status, discussed on the first docket. >
