I support. (Seriously, looks fine, showed up as a reply)
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 4:22 PM, Trigon via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 4/9/21 11:11 PM, reuben.sta...@gmail.com wrote:
>> sorry but i need to do more email testing
>
> It *looks* like it worked on my end but I would like to know if
On 4/9/21 11:11 PM, reuben.sta...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry but i need to do more email testing
It *looks* like it worked on my end but I would like to know if this
shows up as a reply to a previous testing message. Object to this
message if it looks incorrect on your end. This will help me
sorry but i need to do more email testing
On 4/3/21 5:35 AM, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
this is a test message, please ignore.
This was a test of my command-line SMTP client that I set up on my
raspberry pi as a response to a proto there that would have strongly
encouraged me to set up an automated mail sender.
Don't rely
this is a test message, please ignore.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 6:22 PM Collin Tir via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> forgot to say this in my joining message but call me "Jumble".
Just as a quick note, you should give your messages a title,
describing the contents in some way (the exception is replies, which
automatically have the
forgot to say this in my joining message but call me "Jumble".
I join Agora Nomic.
I intend to declare apathy without objection, with myself.
nix pointed out that the trick that allows you to cash your own
promise is a weird and counter-intuitive hack. This would allow people
to reclaim their own promises from the library more cleanly, and make
it the default behavior, while still allowing people to override it.
-Aris
---
Title: I Want
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 13:25 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> what author? only players can create proposals. (going by the
> "Registrar's assumption" on greg's personhood unless a cfj finds
> otherwise).
Now I'm wondering if it's possible for a non-person to ever take an
action
On 7/21/2020 1:21 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 13:13 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:11 PM ais523 wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:03 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business
>>> wrote:
On 7/21/20 3:56 PM, Greg P. Thomas II via
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 13:13 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:11 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:03 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > On 7/21/20 3:56 PM, Greg
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:11 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:03 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> > On 7/21/20 3:56 PM, Greg P. Thomas II via agora-business wrote:
> > > I submit the following proposal.
> > >
> > >
On 7/21/20 4:10 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:03 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 7/21/20 3:56 PM, Greg P. Thomas II via agora-business wrote:
>>> I submit the following proposal.
>>>
>>>
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:03 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 7/21/20 3:56 PM, Greg P. Thomas II via agora-business wrote:
> > I submit the following proposal.
> >
> > -
> >
> > Title: Minion Plan
> > Author: Thomas
>
Archived at https://github.com/AgoraNomic/Reporter/tree/master/weekly_summaries
For the week 2020-01-20..26:
# Victory
* G. wins the game by paying a fee of 1000 coins, and tells the story
of eir coins. Thread: "bored of liquidity, need to invest"
# Voting
* The H. Assessor resolves
Seems about right, based on other people's translations. The nice
thing about the Bible is that plenty of people have translated it. I
wouldn't know myself, as I'm only a first year Latin student, and your
Latin is almost certainly better than mine.
-Aris
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Publius
I don't think it does. Would you say my translation seems about right? I am
a bit out of practice.
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's from the Vulgate. Acts 3:15, and as far as I can tell it has nothing
> to do with anything. Am I
It's from the Vulgate. Acts 3:15, and as far as I can tell it has nothing
to do with anything. Am I missing something?
-Aris
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:06 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Rough translation, after fixing some misdeclension:
Rough translation, after fixing some misdeclension: You all have killed the
true creator of life, who god has brought to life from the dead to which we
are witnesses.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
2017-04-18 22:25 GMT-04:00 James Beirne :
> auctorem vero vitae
auctorem vero vitae interfecistis quem deus suscitavit a mortuis cuius nos
testes sumus
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:44:31 -0400
omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals (with
preliminary IDs):
Though it's of course the Promotor's prerogative to choose when to
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote:
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals (with
preliminary IDs):
Though it's of course the Promotor's prerogative to choose when to
distribute, I'm curious why you didn't distribute all of them.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
A trend/tradition of the second half of Agora's life actually.
The phrase '[x] is a player' has 80+ hits in the CFJ statement
database.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
A trend/tradition of the second half of Agora's life actually.
The phrase '[x] is a player' has 80+ hits in the CFJ statement
database.
And the Class-3
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
A trend/tradition of the second half of Agora's life actually.
The phrase '[x] is a player' has 80+ hits in the
On 9 July 2013 04:16, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Don't think CFJ about a registration attempt to discussion list is
frivolous though :P
According to the OED, 'frivolous' has a special legal sense meaning
'manifestly insufficient or futile'. Since it is well established in law
Let me stress that I'm talking hypothetically. Roujo never actually called
for Judgement (wrong forum, hehe), and so did not actually commit the
Crime. But I am interested to know what the Courts would consider a
frivolous CFJ in the sense of the last paragraph of R869.
On 9 July 2013 09:26,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
Let me stress that I'm talking hypothetically. Roujo never actually called
for Judgement (wrong forum, hehe), and so
did not actually commit the Crime. But I am interested to know what the
Courts would consider a frivolous CFJ in the
sense of the
Level confusion, Goethe. The Statement Roujo committed the Class-3 Crime
of Hazing. is not frivolous; it alleges that Roujo frivolously CFJed on
the success of a player's attempt to register.
On 9 July 2013 10:10, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
Level confusion, Goethe. The Statement Roujo committed the Class-3 Crime of
Hazing. is not frivolous; it alleges that Roujo
frivolously CFJed on the success of a player's attempt to register.
No, I meant if I personally (independent of Roujo) CFJ'd
I register. I support Fool's intent to found the Serious party, and I do so.
On 8 Jul 2013 01:15, Lindar Greenwood lindartheb...@gmail.com wrote:
I register. I support Fool's intent to found the Serious party, and I do
so.
Welcome!
NttPF (Not to the Public Forum): which is agora-business. All in-game
actions must be taken there.
Also, your attempt to do so fails
Welcome! =D
I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Lindar is a player. }
Arguments: While he claimed intent to register, he did not submit it
to the right forum. Something something R101, something something
R2397.
~ Roujo
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Lindar Greenwood
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
On 8 July 2013 10:35, Jonathan Rouillard jonathan.rouill...@gmail.comwrote:
Welcome! =D
I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Lindar is a
player. }
Arguments: While he claimed intent to register, he did not submit it
to the right forum. Something
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Steven Gardner
steven.gard...@monash.edu wrote:
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
Not usually. Class-1 is already a bit much for me.
~ Roujo
On 07/07/2013 8:46 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Steven Gardner
steven.gard...@monash.edu wrote:
Class-3 Hazing, Roujo?
Not usually. Class-1 is already a bit much for me.
~ Roujo
Besides pantyhose are so uncomfortable in the summer.
On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:35 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
Welcome! =D
I submit the following CFJ to the Ambassador-at-Large: { Lindar is a player. }
Arguments: While he claimed intent to register, he did not submit it
to the right forum. Something something R101, something something
R2397.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
Pretty sure the Gerontocracy is irrelevant. The only things that matter
(pretending Lindar's message was effective) are that Fool announced intent
within the correct time period, Fool is authorized to perform the action,
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
Pretty sure the Gerontocracy is irrelevant. The only things that matter
(pretending Lindar's message was effective) are that Fool announced
intent within the correct time period, Fool is
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
Did 4 days pass since the declaration of intent already, and if it did so,
given the strong precedence claims, does that mean the action can now be
performed? (Since no Elders have objected yet.)
Yes. In fact, it could
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
Did 4 days pass since the declaration of intent already, and if it did so,
given the strong precedence claims, does that mean the action can now be
performed? (Since no Elders have objected
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Ørjan Johansen oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
Um no, if Elders object _before_ the attempt to act, Rule 2357 says that
Agora is not Satisfied with the intent, and so point (c) of Rule 1728 would
not be complied with.
What I'm unsure of is whether, and how long, it
I do not register. I propose repealing rule 327.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:27 PM, The UNDEAD theagoranund...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not register. I propose repealing rule 327.
Well... even though there are supposed to be a few days left, I don't
want to delay this further lest someone else beat me to it :)
I invoke judgement on the statement
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, omd wrote:
I submit that either I or my brother sent this message, but I won't
reveal which one. My brother is not a Voter, so the move is legal iff
I was the one who sent it.
I put 10 doubloons in the coffer to post a Black Hand, specifying omd.
(I apologize for being
On 25 Jun 2013 22:18, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, omd wrote:
I submit that either I or my brother sent this message, but I won't
reveal which one. My brother is not a Voter, so the move is legal iff
I was the one who sent it.
I put 10 doubloons in the
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, omd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:27 PM, The UNDEAD theagoranund...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not register. I propose repealing rule 327.
Well... even though there are supposed to be a few days left, I don't
want to delay this further lest someone else beat me to it
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
On 25 Jun 2013 22:18, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, omd wrote:
I submit that either I or my brother sent this message, but I won't
reveal which one. My brother is not a Voter, so the move is legal iff
I was
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 15:58 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
I have heard of the UNDEAD a few times before, but may I ask what it is?
You can certainly ask, but if the above action was at all successful, I dare
not say.
Well, given that I have no
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 15:58 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Charles Walker wrote:
I have heard of the UNDEAD a few times before, but may I ask what it is?
You can certainly ask, but if the above action was at all successful, I dare
On 25/06/2013 8:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The fact that it was known to exist, but secretive, generated a surprising
amount of paranoia in some non-member Agorans. There were a couple genuine
witch hunts looking for members, for a short time Agora was genuinely like
a game of werewolf.
You
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013, Fool wrote:
On 25/06/2013 8:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
The fact that it was known to exist, but secretive, generated a surprising
amount of paranoia in some non-member Agorans. There were a couple genuine
witch hunts looking for members, for a short time Agora was
This is another test.
I'm starting to worry that Yahoo! can't send truly
plain-text messages at all...
--
ais523
2009/7/5 Alex Smith callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk:
Just use gmail.
what to do
On 26/02/2008, Ankica Zilic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what to do
Read the rules, become a player, have fun, I suppose. The rules are at
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/agora/current_slr.txt
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:45 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the rules, become a player, have fun, I suppose. The rules are at
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/agora/current_slr.txt
Not the SLR! Try the FLR, it's tastier.
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/agora/current_flr.txt
Joshua Boehme wrote:
I'm assuming players fall under the definition of Rule-defined entities.
What's interesting is that there are patent titles which still exist under
the rules and are assigned to Chuck, so it's possible e is still defined to
some degree in relation to those.
60 matches
Mail list logo