Re: BUS: Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-15 Thread Jason Cobb
Whoops, this should have gone to the actual distribution. Jason Cobb On 7/15/19 8:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: CoE: Falsifian is the author of 8202 ("Police Power"), although e has listed me as a co-author.

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread Aris Merchant
Just a heads up to everyone: I’m traveling at the moment, so the report will be delayed. I was hoping to finish it up quickly today, but I had less time than I thought I would and people keep creating tons of uproposals. So, I’ll try to get it out as soon as I can, but that may take a bit. -Aris

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread D. Margaux
> On Jul 14, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > After pondering on it I'm likely going to vote against it - the stakes are > too high. I don't think it's reasonable to be able to steal all of > someone's assets via minor inattention. Well, under the current rules, players can protect

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 7/14/2019 10:48 AM, James Cook wrote: On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 16:04, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> This also gives a mechanism to trade/sell zombies - that was purposefully>> left out of the original I don't really think zombies should be a fungible>> asset.> > Why not? The zombie rules as a whole

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread James Cook
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 16:04, Kerim Aydin wrote: > After pondering on it I'm likely going to vote against it - the stakes are > too high. I don't think it's reasonable to be able to steal all of > someone's assets via minor inattention. Oh, for some reason I thought this was just for stealing

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread James Cook
Oh, that makes sense. You probably want to do something about zombies with resale value 0. Normally their master switches can't be changed to another player. On Sun., Jul. 14, 2019, 11:53 D. Margaux, wrote: > Thought it could add a fun mechanic to zombies, where we'd be trying to > catch each

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
After pondering on it I'm likely going to vote against it - the stakes are too high. I don't think it's reasonable to be able to steal all of someone's assets via minor inattention. This also gives a mechanism to trade/sell zombies - that was purposefully left out of the original I don't

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread Jason Cobb
fore the switch is flipped." Immediately following this sentence: "A zombie's master CAN flip that zombie's master switch to Agora by announcement." } Begin forwarded message: From: Jason Cobb Date: July 14, 2019 at 1:25:10 AM EDT To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org Subj

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread D. Margaux
Thought it could add a fun mechanic to zombies, where we'd be trying to catch each other off guard. Especially because people tend to have periods of higher and lower attention to Agora. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 11:28 AM James Cook wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 11:23, D. Margaux wrote: > > I

Re: BUS: Fwd: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-14 Thread James Cook
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 11:23, D. Margaux wrote: > I withdraw my AFK proposal and propose this in its place: > > Title: AFK Reform Act v1.1 What's the purpose of this proposal?

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-13 Thread Jason Cobb
Falisifian is the author of 8202 ("Police Power"), although e has listed me as a co-author. Jason Cobb On 7/13/19 11:15 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: With all of the proposals that are in the pool at the moment, errors seem likely. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. -Aris --- I hereby

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-07-13 Thread Aris Merchant
With all of the proposals that are in the pool at the moment, errors seem likely. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision,

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Jason Cobb
Ah sorry. I promise that I can read! Jason Cobb On 6/22/19 10:20 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: No, you're getting the formula wrong. Rule 879 says that "If no other rule defines the quorum of an Agoran Decision, the quorum for that decision is equal to 2/3 of the number of voters on the Agoran

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
No, you're getting the formula wrong. Rule 879 says that "If no other rule defines the quorum of an Agoran Decision, the quorum for that decision is equal to 2/3 of the number of voters on the Agoran Decision to adopt a proposal that had been most recently resolved at the time of that decision's

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Rebecca
"ha who reads things when they can just complain instead" - me On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:13 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought Proposal 8181 did that? > > -Aris > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:11 PM Rebecca wrote: > > > > uh nobody's fixed the Cold Hand of

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Jason Cobb
Why wouldn't the quorum change? The highest numbered proposal in the purported resolution had 10 voters.  With Telnaior, it would go to 11. By Rule 879, quorum is ceil(2/3*(# voters on last resolved decision to adopt a proposal)). 10*2/3=6.666..., which goes to 7. With Telnaior,

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
I thought Proposal 8181 did that? -Aris On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:11 PM Rebecca wrote: > > uh nobody's fixed the Cold Hand of Justice? > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:07 PM Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:02 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Rebecca
uh nobody's fixed the Cold Hand of Justice? On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:07 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:02 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > > > Quorum might be wrong, given this CoE on the Assessor report by G (in a > > reply to the thread): >

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:02 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > Quorum might be wrong, given this CoE on the Assessor report by G (in a > reply to the thread): Thanks for pointing that out; you're right that I didn't notice. On this occasion, quorum is unchanged due to the way the rounding works out. > >

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Jason Cobb
Quorum might be wrong, given this CoE on the Assessor report by G (in a reply to the thread): CoE:  This leaves out my votes on Telnaior's behalf, which change the outcome of at least one proposal I think (8184). Also, what exactly is your "standard reward policy"? Jason Cobb On 6/22/19

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's a draft of my Promotor report. My standard reward policy for catching errors is in effect. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2019-06-11 Thread Jason Cobb
I am the author of "Not so indestructible now, eh?". This is correct in the table but not correct in the text of the proposal. Jason Cobb On 6/11/19 7:31 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: Given how long it's been, and how many proposals there are, I'd like to send out a draft rather than just getting

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2019-06-11 Thread Aris Merchant
Given how long it's been, and how many proposals there are, I'd like to send out a draft rather than just getting everything wrong. Here's that draft. There will be a small reward (plus my appreciation) for any corrections! -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2019-04-01 Thread Aris Merchant
Would someone look over this? I have a feeling I may be missing something, but it's possible activity has just been really low. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-03-02 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I don't see any errors in this draft, but I've just noticed that the previous Promotor report omitted CuddleBeam's proposal "And the next thing you know, Space Ships are going to have more rights than people", which has now been self-ratified out of existence. It was submitted in this message:

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-03-01 Thread Aris Merchant
Salvete omnes! Here's my not very weekly draft. I'm sorry it's so late. I've been busy IRL (and still am, actually). If everyone's okay with it, I'll publish it soon. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-02-09 Thread Madeline
That draft is missing my proposal, quoted below: On 2019-02-04 13:58, Telnaior wrote: Title: No Contract Reporting Rewards Author: Telnaior Co-Author: G. Adoption Index: 2 { Add the following line to Rule 1006 ("Offices") after "If the holder of an office is ever not a player, it becomes

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-02-08 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's my weekly draft. D Margaux, you can stop worrying about deputizing for me now... -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-01-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 2:15 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Oh gosh, I'd completely forgotten about the tangelo thing. Out of curiosity, > does anyone think it will actually have any effect on anything at all? (Given > that Powerful Tangeloes almost certainly won't pass.) .a'u .iacu'i > Title

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-01-21 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Oh gosh, I'd completely forgotten about the tangelo thing. Out of curiosity, does anyone think it will actually have any effect on anything at all? (Given that Powerful Tangeloes almost certainly won't pass.) Title and AI for 8142 are wrong in the full text section. So is AI for 8143. I've

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-01-21 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:25 PM Aris Merchant wrote: > > Here's a draft. I'm sorry if you're not twg and you submitted a > proposal. I haven't been bribed, I assure you; this is just all I > could find after poking around a bit. > > -Aris Oops, revision. -Aris I hereby distribute each listed

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2019-01-20 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's a draft. I'm sorry if you're not twg and you submitted a proposal. I haven't been bribed, I assure you; this is just all I could find after poking around a bit. -Aris I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-11-23 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Looks correct to me, but note that I just submitted another proposal. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, November 23, 2018 8:40 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Okay, everyone, I am not technically late for a change, so here's a > draft of my Promotor report. Corrections are, as

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-11-23 Thread Aris Merchant
Okay, everyone, I am not technically late for a change, so here's a draft of my Promotor report. Corrections are, as always, appreciated. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft A

2018-09-23 Thread Kerim Aydin
Huh. I agree that our usual Agoran method of interpretation would be (most likely) to treat this literally (i.e. broken). On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > I noticed an issue with the Points proposal. > > >> For a player to 'lose' a point is for it to be destroyed (if e has one). >

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft A

2018-09-23 Thread D Margaux
I noticed an issue with the Points proposal. >> For a player to 'lose' a point is for it to be destroyed (if e has one). There’s a possible bug here. It should say “if e has any,” otherwise (taken literally) a player can lose points only when e has a single point left (“one”). On Sun, Sep 23,

DIS: [Promotor] Draft B

2018-09-23 Thread Aris Merchant
This is the draft for all new proposals. Comments and corrections are, as always, appreciated. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor,

DIS: [Promotor] Draft A

2018-09-23 Thread Aris Merchant
This is the draft for all of the old proposals that have been re-added after they failed quorum. Comments and corrections are, as always, appreciated. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-09-09 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
TTttDF -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:46, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Crap, you're right. I even wrote the resolution message, just never clicked > send. My bad. > > -twg > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Monday, 10 September 2018 00:41, Aris

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-09-09 Thread Aris Merchant
Was Proposal 8089 ever resolved? I can't seem to find an resolution, which would make quorum 2 from Proposal 8087. Also, I have only a week to add them back to the pool, and that time has been expended. We could add them back by proposal though. I'll write one to do that. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-09-09 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I make quorum 4. Voters on proposal 8089 were Aris, G., Murphy, Trigon, twg and Kenyon, making 6 valid ballots. Also, Aris, it would be helpful if you could redistribute proposals 8082-8089, except 8086 which doesn't exist. (8077A-8081A haven't met quorum yet either, but the CFJ on whether you

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-09-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid quorum is 3 I think.

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-09-09 Thread Aris Merchant
Does this look right to everyone? It's been a while (entirely my fault), so I'm probably missing something, but this is the best I've got right now. With apologies, Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-08-10 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
In the full-text-of-proposals section, proposal 8085's title is incorrect. Also, you missed the proposal Kenyon submitted here: https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32486.html Otherwise, it looks good to me! -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 10, 2018

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2018-08-10 Thread Aris Merchant
This is a draft report. Corrections are appreciated, as always. I have marked the proposals that are being distributed a second time A, as noted in the key. This identifies the distribution; the proposal is still the same and thus has the same ID. The distribution-qualified form should be useful

Re: Email again (Re: BUS: Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft)

2018-07-06 Thread Ørjan Johansen
I reenabled delivery, but I think messages to me are still bouncing, my options page on mailman still complains about it and I see archive messages I haven't received (although I received some around when I sent my last message, including my own.) I did get a message successfully from GitHub,

Email again (Re: BUS: Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft)

2018-07-05 Thread Ørjan Johansen
*Sigh* I hadn't seen that previous message. Apparently my email from the lists was disabled because of bounces around July 1, and messages from a-o and a-b only started arriving again today. a-d was still disabled when I checked on the web. I just thought you were being really quiet... Given

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-07-05 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's a draft. Attn. G. and twg: you have proposals you may wish to pend. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5.0

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
Thank you! -Aris On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:38 AM Ned Strange wrote: > Oh I'm very sorry, yes. I missed that it was a draft. I retract my > proposal in the proposal pool > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > It's a draft, so I can do whatever I want. I'm simply

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
It's a draft, so I can do whatever I want. I'm simply requesting that you withdraw it, given that my proposal, which contains a fixed version of yours and lists you as a coauthor, will probably pass, and yours has several bugs in it, as previously mentioned, which would prevent it from ever

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-06-22 Thread Ned Strange
youre obligated to make a weekly proposal pool report, simply saying that it contains a proposal you wish would be withdrawn doesn't count On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Here's a draft. I have a bad feeling that I'm missing something, but > there's been a ton of traffic

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-06-22 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's a draft. I have a bad feeling that I'm missing something, but there's been a ton of traffic and I'm rather busy, so hopefully someone can point it out. Also, a warning: I'll be out of state next week, and, while I can hopefully still devote some time to the game, will be commenting at a

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2018-02-23 Thread Aris Merchant
Sorry this has taken so long. I was buried in work for the weekend and the first half of the week, and I've been recovering since. Anyway, here's my draft report. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2017-12-17 Thread ATMunn
Looks fine to me. On 12/17/2017 2:53 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: A draft Promotor's report follows. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2017-12-16 Thread Aris Merchant
A draft Promotor's report follows. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 7.0, the voting method is AI-majority and the

Re: DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-12-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
Coe: I submitted a proposal called ribbon fix a week ago, in the same message where I called the CFJ. On Sun, 3 Dec 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > Can someone goddamn fix ribbons please? > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > My

Re: DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-12-03 Thread VJ Rada
Can someone goddamn fix ribbons please? On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > My not-very-weekly draft follows. > > -Aris > > --- > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing

DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-12-03 Thread Aris Merchant
My not-very-weekly draft follows. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6.0 [1], the voting method is AI-majority and

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-11-26 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: I retreat Re-opening the Door. ITYM "retract". Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-11-26 Thread ATMunn
I don't really like the look of 7983 and 7889, I think something like this would work better: - Somehow Both Of ... [2] ADoP Obligation ... [6] or alternatively: SBotGT [2] AOC [6] (or ADoPOC [6]) On 11/26/2017 3:24 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: Does this look fine?

Re: DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-11-26 Thread VJ Rada
I retract "clear statement rule" On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Does this look fine? > > -Aris > > --- > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the

DIS: Promotor Draft

2017-11-26 Thread Aris Merchant
Does this look fine? -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5.0, the voting method is AI-majority and the valid options

DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-11-12 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's my intermittent weekly draft. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Distribution

2017-11-05 Thread VJ Rada
Ah, only to a-d. On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:25 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Pretty sure I retracted that version of Community Chest Repeal and > replaced it with a version that amended the two rules in sequential order. > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Distribution

2017-11-05 Thread VJ Rada
Pretty sure I retracted that version of Community Chest Repeal and replaced it with a version that amended the two rules in sequential order. On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have trouble believing that this is it, but these are all

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Distribution

2017-11-05 Thread Aris Merchant
I have trouble believing that this is it, but these are all the proposals I could find. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2017-10-29 Thread Aris Merchant
Now that's an error you could reasonably yellow card me for, if I did it again. Fixed, with my sincere apologies. -Aris On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 8:19 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > This has already been pointed out twice. I STILL didn't write HTML > Scrubbing or No List Prefixes. > >

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2017-10-29 Thread VJ Rada
This has already been pointed out twice. I STILL didn't write HTML Scrubbing or No List Prefixes. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Here's a draft. This should work properly, right? > > -Aris > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal,

DIS: [Promotor] Draft

2017-10-29 Thread Aris Merchant
Here's a draft. This should work properly, right? -Aris I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2017-10-23 Thread VJ Rada
o. is a co-author of I Demand Faster Auctions, which you do not list here. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Also my two proposals about the mailing lists. > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 09:17 Alexis Hunt wrote: >> >> I believe my high power

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2017-10-23 Thread Alexis Hunt
Also my two proposals about the mailing lists. On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 09:17 Alexis Hunt wrote: > I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote: > >> Looks good to me. >> >> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2017-10-23 Thread Alexis Hunt
I believe my high power cleanup proposal is missing. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017, 09:11 ATMunn ., wrote: > Looks good to me. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed

Re: DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2017-10-23 Thread ATMunn .
Looks good to me. On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again. > > -Aris > > --- > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it,

DIS: [Promotor] Draft Report

2017-10-23 Thread Aris Merchant
Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again. -Aris --- I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 8.0 and the valid

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > To be clear, I think your proposed fix of "making lots of simple ways to > earn shinies" would work just as well as a fixed basic income, as long as > there are enough of those things from the beginning for non-officer players > to do, that they can have

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday > >>> would mostly benefit the already successful players. > > This is where I disagree,

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Nicholas Evans
I withdraw the proposal titled Debts. On Sep 1, 2017 1:21 AM, "Aris Merchant" wrote: > nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as > in the next day or two). > > -Aris > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-09-01 Thread Aris Merchant
nichdel, is debts being pulled? I should be releasing fairly soonish (as in the next day or two). -Aris On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:30 PM Nic Evans wrote: > > > On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > >>> I'm opposed to anything

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-31 Thread Nic Evans
On 08/31/17 16:50, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >>> I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday >>> would mostly benefit the already successful players. > This is where I disagree, primarily. We've never had a system that didn't > allow

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-31 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > > I'm opposed to anything that doesn't scale with need. A regular payday > > would mostly benefit the already successful players. This is where I disagree, primarily. We've never had a system that didn't allow a base level of activity on a weekly or

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-31 Thread Nic Evans
On 08/31/17 16:17, Nic Evans wrote: > (I've been a bit distracted lately but I'm keeping up with conversation.) > > The current economy was designed with the idea of coupling economics > closely to productivity. Creating work costs, and resolving work pays. > It's intentionally difficult to

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-31 Thread Nic Evans
On 08/29/17 13:00, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: IDAuthor(s) AI Title ---

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-29 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> IDAuthor(s) AI Title >>> --- >>> pp1 nichdel, o, grok, Aris 3.0

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-29 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > IDAuthor(s) AI Title > > --- > > pp1 nichdel, o, grok, Aris 3.0 Debts > > pp2 nichdel 1.0 Better Accounting > > I pend each of these

DIS: Promotor draft report

2017-08-28 Thread Aris Merchant
I'm trying something new with my draft this week. I have attempted pleading, and begging and the like, and my previous reports have still had occasional errors. I check all my reports numerous times, and then do this whole drafting thing. Still occasional errors. So this week, I decided to