Re: DIS: [Proto] Competitive Finger Pointing
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 22:14, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a very early proto, but I figured I'd throw it out there for > consideration while other criminal reforms are being discussed. > > The idea is: > > * Shenanigans is a 0+X crime, where X is the number of times in the last > 7 days e has previously committed Shenanigans. > > * The player who did the most fingerpointing that resulted that results > in fines in the last calendar week may once create a Blot-B-Gone card in > eir possession. If their is a tie, only the first player to attempt to > do so is successful. I love it. Let's enforce the rules! - Falsifian
Re: DIS: [Proto] Competitive Finger Pointing
On 6/10/20 5:24 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/10/20 6:21 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion > wrote: >> I'd be interested in both of these proposals, but I think that there >> should be some number, probably 1, of free Shenanigans because I don't >> want to be in a position where I have to punish someone regardless of >> the outcome. > > My reading is that on the first finger-point, the "number of times in > the last 7 days e has previously committed Shenanigans" is 0, since > there were no previous finger-points. That would mean it's not punishable. > > -- > Jason Cobb > That's correct and intentional.
Re: DIS: [Proto] Competitive Finger Pointing
On 6/10/20 6:21 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > I'd be interested in both of these proposals, but I think that there > should be some number, probably 1, of free Shenanigans because I don't > want to be in a position where I have to punish someone regardless of > the outcome. My reading is that on the first finger-point, the "number of times in the last 7 days e has previously committed Shenanigans" is 0, since there were no previous finger-points. That would mean it's not punishable. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: [Proto] Competitive Finger Pointing
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:14 PM nch via agora-discussion wrote: > > This is a very early proto, but I figured I'd throw it out there for > consideration while other criminal reforms are being discussed. > > The idea is: > > * Shenanigans is a 0+X crime, where X is the number of times in the last > 7 days e has previously committed Shenanigans. > > * The player who did the most fingerpointing that resulted that results > in fines in the last calendar week may once create a Blot-B-Gone card in > eir possession. If their is a tie, only the first player to attempt to > do so is successful. > > I'd be interested in both of these proposals, but I think that there should be some number, probably 1, of free Shenanigans because I don't want to be in a position where I have to punish someone regardless of the outcome.
DIS: [Proto] Competitive Finger Pointing
This is a very early proto, but I figured I'd throw it out there for consideration while other criminal reforms are being discussed. The idea is: * Shenanigans is a 0+X crime, where X is the number of times in the last 7 days e has previously committed Shenanigans. * The player who did the most fingerpointing that resulted that results in fines in the last calendar week may once create a Blot-B-Gone card in eir possession. If their is a tie, only the first player to attempt to do so is successful.
