I wrote:
I believe Kelly maintains that we quit playing Agora when it was
decided (*not* by me) to handwave away the Annabel issue
instead of reconstructing the gamestate.
On 1/12/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I object to my Annabel is deemed to have been a separate person
all
One other aspect of Agoran common custom is that this is a legal
game before a logic/mathematical one, and we've used in the past
legal reasonableness to sidestep the more trivial paradoxes.
Especially true in the current, slimmed-down ruleset.
In legal terms, Unanimous means having the
I wrote:
And if all parties to an agreement have consented, it would
substantially abridge the rights of the Players in R101 if we
*didn't* assume prima facie that the change was valid.
Ps. It's possible, following this argument, that if *all*
indices are broken or unordered, then the
On 1/12/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
of selecting a reasonable ordering for the index. Who knows,
maybe even Kelly would like it.
I believe Kelly maintains that we quit playing Agora when it was
decided (*not* by me) to handwave away the Annabel issue
instead of reconstructing the
4 matches
Mail list logo
