Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-28 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: I mean that supporters are not allowed to perform actions restricted to specific players. For example, only the correct officer can resolve an officer-only intent. I'm pretty sure it still works if it's generally "any player CAN with 2 support". Oh.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-28 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 20:16 Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > This is intentional, as far as I'm aware. > > If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know > that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-28 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: This is intentional, as far as I'm aware. If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due to the phrasing of the rule. See also my proto message. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-28 Thread Alexis Hunt
This is intentional, as far as I'm aware. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, 01:45 Ørjan Johansen, wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 01:03 Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > >> I support and do so. > >> > > > > This doesn't work as

Dependent Actions Proto (Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?)

2017-11-28 Thread Ørjan Johansen
I made a proto fix: {{{ Fix Dependent Actions (AI=3) Amend rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) by: 1. replacing A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to perform an action by by A rule which purports to allow a person to perform an action by [Dependent on

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-27 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 01:03 Gaelan Steele wrote: I support and do so. This doesn't work as you don't hold the office, however, with o, Aris, and Gaelan's support, I do so. I'm pretty sure Gaelan's action is _intended_ to work by

Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-27 Thread Gaelan Steele
I’ll take it. Gaelan > On Nov 22, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I don't actually.

Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-27 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 19:02 ATMunn wrote: > I certainly don't want it. > > On 11/26/2017 6:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > it's not that hard guys. @trigon @atmunn @telnaior etc. > > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > >> Anyone at

Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-26 Thread ATMunn
I certainly don't want it. On 11/26/2017 6:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote: it's not that hard guys. @trigon @atmunn @telnaior etc. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: Anyone at all? Perhaps one of the candidates for Referee? I will resign the office before any

Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-26 Thread VJ Rada
it's not that hard guys. @trigon @atmunn @telnaior etc. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Anyone at all? Perhaps one of the candidates for Referee? I will resign the > office before any further obligations come due; I'm not willing to do the > work and am

Re: DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-26 Thread Alexis Hunt
Anyone at all? Perhaps one of the candidates for Referee? I will resign the office before any further obligations come due; I'm not willing to do the work and am only holding onto it to deny it from VJ. On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18:56 Alexis Hunt wrote: > I don't actually. >

DIS: Anyone want to be interim Referee?

2017-11-22 Thread Alexis Hunt
I don't actually.