On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I mean that supporters are not allowed to perform actions restricted to
specific players. For example, only the correct officer can resolve an
officer-only intent. I'm pretty sure it still works if it's generally "any
player CAN with 2 support".
Oh.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 20:16 Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> > This is intentional, as far as I'm aware.
>
> If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know
> that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
This is intentional, as far as I'm aware.
If by "this" you mean that supporters are allowed to be performers, I know
that, but my claim is that this is actually broken due to the phrasing of
the rule. See also my proto message.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
This is intentional, as far as I'm aware.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017, 01:45 Ørjan Johansen, wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 01:03 Gaelan Steele wrote:
> >
> >> I support and do so.
> >>
> >
> > This doesn't work as
I made a proto fix:
{{{
Fix Dependent Actions (AI=3)
Amend rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) by:
1. replacing
A rule which purports to allow a person (the performer) to perform
an action by
by
A rule which purports to allow a person to perform an action by
[Dependent on
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 01:03 Gaelan Steele wrote:
I support and do so.
This doesn't work as you don't hold the office, however, with o, Aris, and
Gaelan's support, I do so.
I'm pretty sure Gaelan's action is _intended_ to work by
I’ll take it.
Gaelan
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> I don't actually.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 at 19:02 ATMunn wrote:
> I certainly don't want it.
>
> On 11/26/2017 6:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > it's not that hard guys. @trigon @atmunn @telnaior etc.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> >> Anyone at
I certainly don't want it.
On 11/26/2017 6:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
it's not that hard guys. @trigon @atmunn @telnaior etc.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
Anyone at all? Perhaps one of the candidates for Referee? I will resign the
office before any
it's not that hard guys. @trigon @atmunn @telnaior etc.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Anyone at all? Perhaps one of the candidates for Referee? I will resign the
> office before any further obligations come due; I'm not willing to do the
> work and am
Anyone at all? Perhaps one of the candidates for Referee? I will resign the
office before any further obligations come due; I'm not willing to do the
work and am only holding onto it to deny it from VJ.
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18:56 Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I don't actually.
>
I don't actually.
12 matches
Mail list logo