I'm a big fan of maps with more than two dimensions on them, and would like
to suggest that Agoran lands be at least in part locatable on an axis
between gooey and prickly, in addition to the normal compass points.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 3:54 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> The map is going to be
The map is going to be repealed soon. Also if it wasn't, there's still only
two dimensions on it.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 14:52 David Nicol wrote:
> You seem to have limited your board to two dimensions, which might be by
> design instead of oversight. On the other hand, Agora Lands are probably
>
You seem to have limited your board to two dimensions, which might be by
design instead of oversight. On the other hand, Agora Lands are probably 2D.
see http://tipjar.com/games/CHESS/FullBoardStrongKnights.html which was of
course inspired by
FRC round 256, which involved playing chess in a
On 6/23/2018 6:07 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Any party to this contract MAY, by announcement, move a chess
piece.
I think in place of MAY you want "CAN, subject to the restrictions
of this contract,"
Ah, I hadn't read rule 2152 carefully enough - I hadn't realised MAY
and CAN were subtly
On June 23, 2018 10:07 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Ah, that's a misconception I hadn't realised I had - that switches are
> necessarily tracked by the same person as their entities. Looking over this
> that's actually the root cause of many of the other problems with this. I'll
> read the
Awesome, thanks for the feedback!
On June 21, 2018 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Define who tracks these switches or are they untracked? (being the
> recordkeepor for chess pieces doesn't mean recordkeepor for the switches).
Ah, that's a misconception I hadn't realised I had - that switches are
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> PREAMBLE. This contract is to be interpreted as if it were capable of
> defining switches.
> If the Cartographor is a party to this contract, e is the recordkeepor
> for chess pieces.
Define who tracks these switches or are they untracked?
I hadn't really paid much attention to contracts before the discussion last
week, but I figured it would be fun to enter V.J. Rada's competition, if only
for practice with writing legalistic documents. (I get the impression that
subgames like this are probably better suited to actual rules, or
8 matches
Mail list logo
