I think the permanent recognition should be patent-title based.
I'm not sure I'd ever want to win as it's written if the price is
giving up all my land.
As written, doesn't have a very strong mutual goal - But that also
kind of depends on the various ways to achieve prestige (I like that
This was actually intentional - I reasoned that there might be occasions when
we'd want to award a certain amount of prestige permanently (or at least until
the recipient won via prestige) for some achievement or service. For example,
awarding a token amount (say 1) to each officer at Payday.
On Sun, 2018-08-19 at 20:29 +, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I have been drafting a proto. I haven't finished it yet, but this is
> the main part:
The switch-based wording you have here means that it's possible to have
persistent prestige changes that aren't tied to any facilities (and
there
I have been drafting a proto. I haven't finished it yet, but this is the main
part:
//
Enact a rule "Land Prestige", of power 2.0, with the following text:
Land Prestige is an integer person switch tracked by the Herald.
I probably don't have time to write the proposal myself, but we
clearly need a win condition for land if we're going to encourage
people to use it. G.'s idea sounded very interesting, as did eir
earlier three asset model. Does anyone else have any ideas?
-Aris
5 matches
Mail list logo
