On 9/17/24 4:52 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
I don't like the perverse incentives that crystals create. If someone
else writes a proposal that touches a lot of rules, then I'm
incentivized to vote AGAINST that proposal for economic reasons, even if
it's good. I try not to do that,
Much obliged. I tip my knitted cap to you.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 7:16 PM ais523 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-09-17 at 00:53 +0100, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
> official wrote:
> > I recuse 4st from CFJ 4094 on grounds of lateness.
> >
> > I ass
On 9/17/24 16:48, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 3:23 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>>> 9183~ snail 1.0 Creation Crystals
>> AGAINST. I continue to not like crystals.
>>
>>
> Do you have any sug
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 3:23 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 9183~ snail 1.0 Creation Crystals
>
> AGAINST. I continue to not like crystals.
>
>
Do you have any suggestions on how to make crystals better?
--
snail
On Mon, 2024-09-16 at 19:39 +0100, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
wrote:
> I find trivially FALSE, per qenya.
>
> I self-file a motion to reconsider, because that’s a cop-out and we all know
> it.
>
> (Apologies for the extended delay in judgement; I’ll try to deliver a
> substantive judgeme
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 4:23 PM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Also rule creation doesn't come with IDs until the rulekeepor assigns them,
> so I don't think it'd even work?
>
> --
> 4st
> putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
>
Crystals
Also rule creation doesn't come with IDs until the rulekeepor assigns them,
so I don't think it'd even work?
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 2:21 PM 4st nomic <4st.no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Against! The purpose of crystals is to encourage rule
Against! The purpose of crystals is to encourage rule destruction, rule
creation is heretical!!
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 1:55 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
I push the boulder whist doing a handstand
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Edward Murphy via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2024 5:10:12 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: Edward Murphy
Subject: BUS: Second star to the right (attn Absurdor)
I push
Tracked by who? The Absurdor, like the Boulder’s Height? If so, please state
that.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 16:35, 4st nomic via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 16:35, 4st
nomic via agora-business < wrote:
> The Boulder's Abstrusity is a singleton
On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 12:00 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> If snail has won the game and I can do so, I grant them the patent title of
> Champion.
> (I think this is trivially true, but there is an open CFJ).
The CFJ has been judged; snail did win the game and this is EFFECTIVE.
~qe
On 9/8/24 5:16 PM, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
I wield the Minty Stone, specifying myself
*sigh* this failed, as the Minty Stone was still hot.
--
Mischief
Collector
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: ghostly
Bang holdings: 0
On 9/8/24 6:08 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-business wrote:
I CFJ on the statement "I owe Janet and Mischief one spendie each."
I bar Janet from this CFJ due to eir obvious conflict of interest (I would
bar Mischief as well, but I can only bar one person...)
Something worth pointing out to the e
Mischief wrote:
On 9/1/24 11:49 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
CoE: The ownership of the Recursion Stone is disputed, and depends on
the outcome of CFJ 4093. (I know you know this, but as far as I can
tell snail would self-ratify as the owner if I didn't CoE, because the
report doesn't m
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 11:20, juan via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion [2024-09-06 06:29]:
>> Example: I push the boulder.
>
> It is ambiguous if your are exemplifying the action itself or simply the
> phrasing of the action, so the announcement is not unambiguo
Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion [2024-09-06 06:29]:
> Example: I push the boulder.
It is ambiguous if your are exemplifying the action itself or simply the
phrasing of the action, so the announcement is not unambiguous, and fails.
--
juan
Absurdor
If I’m not mistaken, e already tagged the relevant officers in a reply to this
message.
- oliver.n
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 07:29, Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 07:29, Agora
amdw42 via agora-discussion < wrote:
> Send to Agora
behalf of
Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 2:22:56 AM
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Cc: Oliver Nguyen
Subject: DIS: Re: BUS: Juggling
Good. That means I own the Hot Potato Stone, and therefore, have owned at least
one stone.
Also, how did you push the
Good. That means I own the Hot Potato Stone, and therefore, have owned at least
one stone.
Also, how did you push the boulder?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 22:54, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 22:54, Katherina
Walshe-Grey via
No, I knew this, I just wanted to make my intent to object public.
On Tue, 3 Sept 2024, 12:01 pm Aris via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 6:23 PM Matt Smyth via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 2, 2024,
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 6:23 PM Matt Smyth via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > > On Sep 2, 2024, at 18:00, secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I intend, with notice, to make mqyhlkahu inactive.
> >
> I object to this inten
On 9/2/24 6:13 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-business wrote:
Who is LiterallyAmbibuous?
That one fails obviously
Or maybe it's literallyAmbitious. E was quite an infamous go-getter back
in the day.
--
Mischief
Collector
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: alive
Bang holdings: 1
it’s obviously LiterallyAmbidextrous
Sent from my teakettle
> On Sep 2, 2024, at 18:12, Mischief via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> On 9/2/24 5:59 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
>
>> I intend, with notice, to make LiterallyAmbibuous inactive.
>
> Is that literallyAmbiguous, lite
On 9/2/24 5:59 PM, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
I intend, with notice, to make LiterallyAmbibuous inactive.
Is that literallyAmbiguous, literallyAmphibious, or someone else?
FWIW, l-Ambiguous just did a stamp / Gray ribbon trade with Murphy a
couple days ago.
--
Mischief
Collecto
I vote as follows:
> 9168~ Kate2.0 Erosion in Geological Rhyme
As a newcomer here, there's not much I can say
For a long-standing piece such as Stones; but to play
With some fresh toys, and steer their unfolding, is tempting.
I'm sorry to ais, as I aid in preempting
eir
As I see it, I have two options:
* Wait for you to clear the office and then deputise; or
* Deputise immediately before you can clear the office.
Which do you recommend?
On Monday, 2 September 2024 at 11:49, Mischief via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 9/2/24 5:54 AM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-dis
On 9/2/24 5:54 AM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
Would that interfere with my intent to deputise or not?
On Saturday, 31 August 2024 at 01:35, Mischief via agora-business
wrote:
I announce my intent to cause the office of Spendor to
become vacant without 2 objections, per rule 10
Would that interfere with my intent to deputise or not?
On Saturday, 31 August 2024 at 01:35, Mischief via agora-business
wrote:
> I announce my intent to cause the office of Spendor to
> become vacant without 2 objections, per rule 1006.
I knew it wasn’t that simple…
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:04, secretsnail9 via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:04,
secretsnail9 via agora-business < wrote:
> I reveal this secret number (24), specifying its plaintext as "the secret
> number is 24 t
Did you mean SHA-256, or just SHA-56?
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 00:57, secretsnail9 via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 00:57,
secretsnail9 via agora-business < wrote:
> I declare a secret number, with the following fingerprint (SHA-56):
>
> 2b4e9191a8
I think you forgot to appoint winners to the position of speaker, so that
is at least one valid reason to not vote for you? :p
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024, 6:24 PM Jimmy via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I become a
But I like chaos... No vote from me.
On Mon, 2 Sept 2024, 11:24 am Jimmy via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I become a candidate in the ongoing election for prime minister. Hey man. I
> didnt do anything bad last time. A vote for me is a vote for peaceful
> times.
>
With panache
> On Sep 1, 2024, at 17:32, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> Yes, but how?
>
>> On Mon, 2 Sept 2024, 5:47 am Lily Long via agora-business, <
>> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>>
>> I push the boulder.
>>
Yes, but how?
On Mon, 2 Sept 2024, 5:47 am Lily Long via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I push the boulder.
>
On 9/1/24 11:49 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
CoE: The ownership of the Recursion Stone is disputed, and depends on
the outcome of CFJ 4093. (I know you know this, but as far as I can
tell snail would self-ratify as the owner if I didn't CoE, because the
report doesn't make it clear that
I push the boulder horizontally
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Edward Murphy via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2024 1:10:23 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: Edward Murphy
Subject: BUS: Vertical speed, GO! (attn Absurdor)
I push the boulder.
--
On 9/1/24 6:58 AM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
This fails. You spent 20 spendies on stones in your message at 00:00 (UTC),
leaving you with none.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 01:03, se
This fails. You spent 20 spendies on stones in your message at 00:00 (UTC),
leaving you with none.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 01:03,
secretsnail9 via agora-business < wrote:
> i pay a fee of 10 sp
You should have tagged @Spendor, but it doesn’t really matter now, because of
the reset
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 00:57, secretsnail9 via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 00:57,
secretsnail9 via agora-business < wrote:
> I have 18 spendies as far as I
On 8/31/24 8:16 AM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
Do you think I should deputise for Spendor or not?
I don't think you can at the moment -- that was the crux of CFJ 4083 [1]
and the reason for proposal 9161. If the Spendor had other duties you
could deputise on one of them, but it
Do you think I should deputise for Spendor or not?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 12:42, Mischief via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 12:42,
Mischief via agora-discussion < wrote:
> On 8/31/24 4:50 AM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Th
On 8/31/24 4:50 AM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
The intent will become ripe in 4 days, then it’s 7 days for a sortition, so
there will be at least 11 days between now and when Spendies actually start
working again. That’s a bit too long…
I think I have 30 Spendies, but who knows
The intent will become ripe in 4 days, then it’s 7 days for a sortition, so
there will be at least 11 days between now and when Spendies actually start
working again. That’s a bit too long…
I think I have 30 Spendies, but who knows?
Also, with regards to the (probable) upcoming sortition:
> Any
> (Alive, 2 Bangs)
How do you have 2 Bangs?
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 4:36 AM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 3:52 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > The CFJ muddled things a bit, but
On 8/29/24 6:10 PM, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion wrote:
If crystal liquidation fails and this passes, that would not be good
I assume most voting against crystal liquidation would vote against this
too.
Or maybe folks want a tighter money supply
--
Mischief
Collector
Hat: steampunk ha
If crystal liquidation fails and this passes, that would not be good
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 21:42, Mischief via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 21:42, Mischief
via agora-business < wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> "Adjusting the Money
That is true. Should it be applied together with the other balancing change or
should the new change replace the old change?
- oliver.n
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 15:55, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 15:55, 4st
nomic via agora-dis
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:55 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I perform these actions, in this order:
>
> * I withdraw the proposal "Crystal liquidation".
>
> * I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
>
> Title: Crystal liquidation
>
> Adoption index:
On 8/29/24 03:49, Oliver Nguyen via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {{{
>
> Title: Crystal liquidation
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: oliver.n
> Co-author(s): 4st
>
> Amend Rule 2685 "Crystals" by inserting the following text after the end of
> the rule:
>
> {
> Once
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Crystal liquidation
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: oliver.n
Co-author(s): 4st
Amend Rule 2685 "Crystals" by inserting the following text after the end of the
rule:
{
Once per week, a player CAN liquidate a specified crystal that they own by
announcement. Do
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:37 PM Oliver Nguyen via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: Crystal liquidation
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: oliver.n
> Co-author(s): 4st
>
> Amend Rule 2685 "Crystals" by inserting the following text aft
> On Aug 28, 2024, at 17:43, Mischief via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> What if I cast a ballot for 4st > LiterallyAmbiguous?
>
> What if I cast a ballot for 4st > LiterallyAmbiguous >
> yet-to-be-announced-candidate?
>
> Voting "for" someone can be a slippery concept if you're not using
>
On 8/28/24 5:34 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote:
Oh dear...
But how does the voting method being instant runoff make problems for me?
What if I cast a ballot for 4st > LiterallyAmbiguous?
What if I cast a ballot for 4st > LiterallyAmbiguous >
yet-to-be-announced-candidate?
Vot
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:37 PM Mischief via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Maybe there's another out in the rules that I'm not aware of, though.
>
Nah I definitely painted myself into a corner on that one.
On 8/28/24 5:23 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote:
Does it? If I run out, it becomes impossible for me to uphold the next
instance of the pledge, even if I try to. Surely if it's impossible to
uphold a pledge, one can't be considered to have broken it.
Rule 2531 (Defendant's Rights)
Oh dear...
But how does the voting method being instant runoff make problems for me?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:31 PM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 17:23 -0400, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at
On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 17:23 -0400, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:01 PM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > If you run out of spendies, that’s a massive issue
> >
>
> Does it? If I run out, it becomes impossi
On 8/28/24 4:24 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-business wrote:
If I have not already made a binding pledge to bribe... I mean *reward*
everyone who votes for me with one spendie each, I do so now. Spendies will
be paid to each recipient within one Agoran week of their vote being cast.
Breaking this
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:01 PM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> If you run out of spendies, that’s a massive issue
>
Does it? If I run out, it becomes impossible for me to uphold the next
instance of the pledge, even if I try to. Surely if it's impos
If you run out of spendies, that’s a massive issue
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 21:24, Paul McDowell via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 21:24, Paul
McDowell via agora-business < wrote:
> If I have not already made a binding pledge to bribe... I mean *r
Oh yeah?! Pledge it. Bind yourself to the arcane Agoran law thru the
demonic power of the Pledge. :P
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, 12:43 PM Paul McDowell via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> That's far too much power f
I think that holding four offices at once (eir three existing ones, in addition
to Prime Minister) would impair eir ability to perform all of them effectively.
- oliver.n
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 20:21, 4st nomic via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:55 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Becoming a candidate fails, as the election has not yet been initiated.
>
oops, that makes sense
NttPF.
Is that even permitted?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 17:27, Lily Long via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 17:27, Lily
Long via agora-discussion < wrote:
> I object to this, and all future motions to declare Apathy in which I am
> not specifi
On 8/28/24 12:27, Lily Long via agora-discussion wrote:
> I object to this, and all future motions to declare Apathy in which I am
> not specified.
So, unfortunately this was sent to agora-discussion, so it doesn't do
anything. Additionally, even if it was sent to agora-business, you can't
object
I object to this, and all future motions to declare Apathy in which I am
not specified.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 4:00 PM Paul McDowell via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Without objection, I declare Apathy, specifying myself and the following
> players:
> murphy
> amdw42
Besides which, I had reason to believe it would pass, since everyone
benefits. Who would object to a free win, I thought? nomicsare fun to test.
--
juniper
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024, 7:35 am Matt Smyth via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Oh. I just wanted to see if it woul
Oh. I just wanted to see if it would work, I agree that everyone winning
isn't really winning...
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024, 7:33 am Agora amdw42, wrote:
> I object
> A win feels cheap if shared with everyone.
>
> ——
> Ben
> --
> *From:* agora-business on behalf
> of Matt
I object
A win feels cheap if shared with everyone.
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of Matt
Smyth via agora-business
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 5:30:56 PM
To: agora-business
Cc: Matt Smyth
Subject: BUS: What
I declare apathy, including all registere
What sort of bribe are you looking for?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:33, ais523 via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:33, ais523
via agora-discussion < wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 15:07 +, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Yo
If someone declared apathy, but with you as a beneficiary, would you continue
to object?
- oliver.n
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 21:30, Mischief via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 21:30, Mischief
via agora-business < wrote:
> I object to any and all
Agreed.
I declare empathy.
(Not really)
> On Aug 27, 2024, at 16:39, Mischief via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 8/27/24 4:35 PM, Agora amdw42 wrote:
>> I intend to declare victory by apathy pursuant to rule 2465.
>
> I object.
>
>
> Unless someone has a fresh take on this, could we move
Does this work? Is “declaring victory by apathy” different than “declaring
apathy”?
> On Aug 27, 2024, at 16:35, Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> I intend to declare victory by apathy pursuant to rule 2465.
>
> ——
> Ben
>
> From: agora-business
I intend to declare victory by apathy pursuant to rule 2465.
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Mischief via agora-business
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 4:30:51 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: Mischief
Subject: BUS: Precaution
I object to an
I tag this (with flair), because I forgot to do so.
On 8/27/24 21:39, lare290 via agora-business wrote:
I push the boulder. (with style)
At the very least, I've learned a lot from this!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:49 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 11:39 -0400, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:34 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 11:39 -0400, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:34 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > An overt intent to declare Apathy, however, is likely to be
> > objected to by pretty much everyone, so there's n
> An overt intent to declare Apathy, however, is likely to be objected to
by pretty much everyone, so there's not much point in trying.
Fair point. 'Tis a silly rule, then.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:34 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-08-2
>
> "Declaring Apathy" is the action that resolves the intent.
Is it? By my reading of Rule 2124, the intent would resolve when it becomes
mature and ripe, so 14 days from now.
A rule purporting to allow a person to perform a tabled action
> allows em to do so by announcement, if, consideri
On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 15:07 +, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion
wrote:
> You should have specified Janet as well. If you did this, e would be
> less likely to object.
In general, if you're planning to run some sort of scam that involves
nobody noticing what you're up to, it's best to bribe a
Will you continue objecting to any intents to declare Apathy, even if they
include you in the list of beneficiaries?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:27, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:27, Janet
Cobb via agora-discussion < wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:22 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think e intended to create a new intent to declare Apathy, not resolve
> the previous one, which you objected to.
E likely did, but e didn't write it as an intent.
On 8/27/24 11:23,
I did, yes. In my view it's a new intent because the list of beneficiaries
is different.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:22 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think e intended to create a new intent to declare Apathy, not resolve
> the previous one, whi
I think e intended to create a new intent to declare Apathy, not resolve the
previous one, which you objected to.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:19, Janet Cobb via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:19, Janet
Cobb via agora-business < wrote:
> On 8/27
How often are you allowed to attempt to declare Apathy? Because if there isn’t
a limit, you should try to declare it right now!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:11, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:11, Paul
McDowell via agora-disc
indeed...
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:07 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> You should have specified Janet as well. If you did this, e would be less
> likely to object.
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:05, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion <[
> agora-
You should have specified Janet as well. If you did this, e would be less
likely to object.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:05, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:05, Paul
McDowell via agora-discussion < wrote:
> Drat.
>
> Well, i
Drat.
Well, it was worth a shot!
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:02 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 8/27/24 10:59, Paul McDowell via agora-business wrote:
> > Without objection, I declare Apathy, specifying myself and the following
> > players:
> > murphy
I think the link broke sorry
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 13:05, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 13:05, Oliver
Nguyen via agora-discussion < wrote:
> It does not, apparently
>
> - oliver.n
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 13:03, Agora a
It does not, apparently
- oliver.n
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 13:03, Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion
<[agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 13:03, Agora
amdw42 via agora-discussion < wrote:
> Yes but does this cause you to go plaid?
>
> ——
> Ben
Yes but does this cause you to go plaid?
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of Paul
McDowell via agora-business
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 5:38:29 PM
To: agora-business
Cc: Paul McDowell
Subject: Re: BUS: [Absurdor] Boulder stuff
> On Aug 26, 2024, at
I push the boulder at a moderate speed.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 22:28, Matt Smyth via agora-business
<[agora-busin...@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 22:28, Matt
Smyth via agora-business < wrote:
> I push the boulder, extremely quickly.
> --
> juniper
But, how quickly?
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024, 4:04 pm Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I push the boulder
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 11:39 PM Paul McDowell via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Aug 26, 2024, at 17:29, M
wait no this is discussiojn
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:59 PM Celeste Drummond
wrote:
> Can I grant myself a welcome package within this thread?
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:57 PM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I think you should grant yourself a w
Can I grant myself a welcome package within this thread?
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:57 PM 4st nomic via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I think you should grant yourself a welcome package. Before someone else
> does it for you! :p
> --
> 4st
> putting jesters cap back
I think you should grant yourself a welcome package. Before someone else
does it for you! :p
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, 7:47 PM Celeste Drummond via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I register for Agora. My name is C
For each intent to declare Apathy that doesn't include me in the list of
beneficiaries, I object to it.
Just covering my bases
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Edward Murphy via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2024 4:10:54 PM
To: Agora Business
I push the boulder. (Slowly)
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Edward Murphy via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2024 4:11:09 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: Edward Murphy
Subject: BUS: Uppies (attn Absurdor)
I push the boulder.
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:
So, is e the webmastor?
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024, 6:49 am Edward Murphy via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I petition nix (who I believe is still is maintaining agoranomic.org) to
> update the following when time permits:
>
>* Join - mention the additional discussion for
On 8/25/24 9:50 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
but I can't see a good reason *not* to respond to it
The fact that it was (deliberately) posted to a-d and thus wasn't an
announcement?
Also, you submitted that document, but no one has documented that
submission. Tsk tsk.
--
Mischief
1 - 100 of 2910 matches
Mail list logo
