Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy] Arbitor Assignments

2018-10-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 19:55 -0400, D. Margaux wrote: > Argh. I think I forgot to give a number to the Left/Right CFJ. Is > the standard practice to renumber all of the CFJs so that they are in > chronological order, or is it OK to give it the next available > number? Any thoughts about what the

DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy] Arbitor Assignments

2018-10-21 Thread D. Margaux
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 9:05 AM, D. Margaux wrote: > > I think I got all of the unassigned CFJs here. Hope I am doing this right; > please let me know if I made a mistake. Argh. I think I forgot to give a number to the Left/Right CFJ. Is the standard practice to renumber all of the CFJs so

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy] Arbitor Assignments

2018-10-20 Thread ATMunn
oh duh, ok On 10/20/2018 8:47 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: The last Arbitor report has a list of relevant messages On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, 18:46 ATMunn wrote: Where do I need to look for the related messages for my CFJs? On 10/20/2018 9:05 AM, D. Margaux wrote: I think I got all of the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy] Arbitor Assignments

2018-10-20 Thread Reuben Staley
The last Arbitor report has a list of relevant messages On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, 18:46 ATMunn wrote: > Where do I need to look for the related messages for my CFJs? > > On 10/20/2018 9:05 AM, D. Margaux wrote: > > I think I got all of the unassigned CFJs here. Hope I am doing this > right; > >

DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy] Arbitor Assignments

2018-10-20 Thread ATMunn
Where do I need to look for the related messages for my CFJs? On 10/20/2018 9:05 AM, D. Margaux wrote: I think I got all of the unassigned CFJs here. Hope I am doing this right; please let me know if I made a mistake. First, per my previously announced intent, I deputise for Arbitor to assign

DIS: Re: BUS: [Deputy] Arbitor Assignments

2018-10-20 Thread D. Margaux
Two quibbles: First, the correct link for “my email” where I stated the intent is this one: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-September/039218.html In that email, the intent actually is not preceded by “>” marks. It’s freestanding. The text around it is