Assess this, declare that, dude can't take a weekend anymore
Seriously though, maybe I should judge those CFJs on whether
the tournament even exists first? Sorry about not getting to those,
maybe tonight ( -7:00 time), definitely by tomorrow.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius
G., could you declare the winners, so that I may award the appropriate
patent titles?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:19 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only
> really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If
> it
It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only
really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If
it goes for three months, it's way overtime, perhaps because it's broken or
no one is interested enough to complete the goal condition. Under those
Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit included?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within
> within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game,
> otherwise the
R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within
within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game,
otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner."
Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :)
-Aris
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at
I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under
the current rules.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to
> see who wins on points...
>
> If I would be appointed Speaker, I request
I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to
see who wins on points...
If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be deferred
until after the PM election.
-Aris
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Yah sorry about that,
Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which
seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best
as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would
have been best.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> damn time limits!!
damn time limits!! this would have been more fun with higher
participation/longer time but congrats aris.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
> assuming eir argument is ruled VALID
Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona wrote:
>
> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
>
> You mean G.A.N. Agora?
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at
> [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
You mean G.A.N. Agora?
~Corona
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit the below argument on the third docket:
>
> Your Honor,
>
> I agree with My Fellow
11 matches
Mail list logo
