Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Once it's sent to Buisness - yep On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 16:48 Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Would someone mind doing Violet ribbons for everyone? (I'd do it, but > while persons can qualify, only players can award). > > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Would someone mind doing Violet ribbons for everyone? (I'd do it, but while persons can qualify, only players can award). On Thu, 25 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I resolve my intent to grant the Badge of the Great Agoran Revival. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

>I resolve my intent to grant the Badge of the Great Agoran Revival. I'm not sure you can do that on Discussion.

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I resolve my intent to grant the Badge of the Great Agoran Revival. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On May 21, 2017, at 6:10 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I hereby initiate a Victory

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning (fwd)

On Mon, 22 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > > Now, sometimes I read things 100% wrong, so I'll take advice from others > > reading > > that; if most of you took it as a currently-empty (but forward-looking) set, > > I'm happy to withdraw the CFJ because that's on me. If it's a split > > opinion,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning (fwd)

I should add that either way we should probably amend the rule and have a pre-decision period where non-players can be declared, to remove all ambiguity. On 05/22/17 16:33, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> While any individual ​non-player

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning (fwd)

On 05/22/17 16:33, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> While any individual ​non-player person can not begin as options, the class >> of >> non-player persons who have become options by announcement is a valid option >> from the beginning, it

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning (fwd)

On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > While any individual ​non-player person can not begin as options, the class of > non-player persons who have become options by announcement is a valid option > from the beginning, it just begins empty. In recent context, "announced"

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning (fwd)

While any individual ​non-player person can not begin as options, the class of non-player persons who have become options by announcement is a valid option from the beginning, it just begins empty. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Kerim Aydin

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I believe, according to 2127, the first half is a valid condition. It is determinable by information readily available to all players and the value of the condition will be determinable at the end of voting. That said, a closer reading of 2127 tells me that the "else" statement probably has to be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I don't believe this is a valid condition. Gaelan > On May 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, caleb vines wrote: > >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> True, the CoE having been successful, I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Given my recent attempt to "announce" OscarMeyr, I wonder if this is ambiguous? Also, in past, listing "all members of set S" without specifying the individual set members has been seen as ambiguous, IF it is beyond a reasonable effort of an average player to dig back and find that list (as

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On 05/22/17 14:03, Josh T wrote: > > I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced > non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I > would be in favor of all watchers (Ørjan and others) and G. putting > emselves into the race. The ballots should be cast

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On Mon, 22 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: > On 05/22/17 12:36, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Is there consensus that "A person can... by announcement" means that > > only that person can announce for emself? Or that anyone can announce > > for anyone else? > I'm fairly certain that they'd have to be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On 05/22/17 12:36, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> People can stop objecting because it is already dead. > People can remove objections, so it's prudent not to rely on a single > person's (I only saw one person object to every one of them,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Wow - super weird, e-mail client did something super funny there - sorry. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:56 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Er, according to both by sent-mail and inbox return, it went to > Business... Can > someone confirm? > > Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:36:16

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Er, according to both by sent-mail and inbox return, it went to Business... Can someone confirm? > Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) > From: Kerim Aydin > To: Agora Business On Mon, 22 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > Not a public

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Not a public forum - Please resend G. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > People can stop objecting because it is already dead. > > People can remove objections, so it's prudent not to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

People can stop objecting because it is already dead. As to the Victory Election, G. is not yet an option. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Quazie wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:10 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < >

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:10 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced > non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I would > be in favor of all watchers (Ørjan

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I am, in fact, tired of winning. > On May 21, 2017, at 6:10 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced > non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I think if we don't COE that will become part of the ruleset. On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 20:17 Gaelan Steele wrote: > This was my wording: > > The following section is not a portion of the report: > For the purposes of this section, The Sentence is “I intend, > without objection,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

This was my wording: The following section is not a portion of the report: For the purposes of this section, The Sentence is “I intend, without objection, to declare [word], specifying myself.” I execute The Sentence, substituting [word] for a word beginning with “ap” that is a synonym for “not

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On Mon, 22 May 2017, Quazie wrote: I am unsure if you can make actions inside a report? In fact I believe you can't. I am pretty sure there was a precedent one way or the other. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I am unsure if you can make actions inside a report? In fact I believe you can't. On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 20:04 Gaelan Steele wrote: > Darn it all, I snuck one into the middle of the FLR. > > Gaelan > > On May 21, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM Alexis Hunt wrote: > hi Hello! Welcome back! I hope you're feeling better. -Aris >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

hi On Sun, May 21, 2017, 20:00 Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced > > non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I > would > > be

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Darn it all, I snuck one into the middle of the FLR. Gaelan > On May 21, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > > I object to all intentions to declare winner by apathy that currently exist, > except for those that intend to declare me as winner by apathy. smime.p7s

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On Sun, 21 May 2017, Nic Evans wrote: On 05/21/2017 05:10 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I would be in favor of all watchers (Ørjan and others) and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

I vote in the Victory Election for {Ørjan, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus}. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Since I can award it without objection,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

Since I can award it without objection, I see no harm in going ahead and establishing it. I would cast a vote for you, if you would enter. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2017, Publius Scribonius

DIS: Re: BUS: [Herald] Let us begin the winning

On Sun, 21 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I hereby initiate a Victory Election with all players or announced non-players as valid options and the Herald as the vote collector. I would be in favor of all watchers (Ørjan and others) and G. putting emselves into the race. The