DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-20 Thread Alex Smith via agora-discussion
On Tuesday, 19 May 2020, 16:55:10 GMT, nch via agora-business wrote: > By my math this eliminates 108 words from the rules, and more importantly > makes announcement default so it doesn't need to be included in new rules (and > therefore can't accidentally be left out). I think this needs some

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-20 Thread James Cook via agora-discussion
> > That could probably be fixed, but it does seem to change the way at > > least I was thinking of dependent actions. My understanding was: > > dependent actions are methods; R2595 says how the method works; > > R2595's implementation happens to defer to the "by announcement" > > method. > > > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-20 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 5/19/2020 2:56 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote: >> I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ >> judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone >> (especially G.) thought it was a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 5/19/2020 4:01 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > (There are also fee-based actions. I don't know if we have any right > now other than winning under R2483. Also, Agora currently CAN transfer > zombies to their owners, which is not done by announcement.) Also: Initiating Agoran

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 6:01:39 PM CDT James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > I suppose that's true, but with the change you proposed, I think it's > a little unclear how to interpret current rules that describe things > you can do with dependent actions. > > For example, R2465: "A player CAN

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread James Cook via agora-discussion
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 22:15, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 5:07:51 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-discussion wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion > > > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 5:07:51 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion > > wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote: > > > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote: > > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ > > judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone > > (especially G.) thought it

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote: > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ > judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone > (especially G.) thought it was a terrible idea, and they persuaded me. CAN > has a very sensible

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

2020-05-19 Thread Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:14 AM nch via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 11:55:03 AM CDT nch via agora-business wrote: > > By my math this eliminates 108 words from the rules, and more importantly > > makes announcement default so it doesn't need