On 6/27/20 9:07 PM, Ed Strange via agora-business wrote:
> Tpf
>
> On Sun., 28 Jun. 2020, 11:06 am Ed Strange,
> wrote:
>
>> I point a finger at jason for uncertain certification. Reasonable players
>> may not disagree about the operation of the current wording.
I have no reason to believe
On 6/27/20 9:26 PM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> Something must be valid in order to have binding legal effect, surely thats
> what valid means (and my judgement on notices doesnt conflict with that).
Well, this is proof that there's disagreement. I think I'm being
relatively
Something must be valid in order to have binding legal effect, surely thats
what valid means (and my judgement on notices doesnt conflict with that).
On Sun., 28 Jun. 2020, 11:23 am Jason Cobb via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 6/27/20 9:16 PM, Ed Strange via
On 6/27/20 9:16 PM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> No, i said they may not disagree. Any contention that valid and effective
> are not synonyms is, with respect, unreasonable
The argument is that "the announcement" (i.e. the message) being not
"valid" is different from the attempt not
No, i said they may not disagree. Any contention that valid and effective
are not synonyms is, with respect, unreasonable
On Sun., 28 Jun. 2020, 11:12 am Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/27/2020 6:06 PM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
>
On 6/27/2020 6:06 PM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
> I point a finger at jason for uncertain certification. Reasonable players
> may not disagree about the operation of the current wording.
Which means it's an ambiguity which is covered by CP?
-G.
I point a finger at jason for uncertain certification. Reasonable players
may not disagree about the operation of the current wording.
On Sun., 28 Jun. 2020, 11:02 am Jason Cobb via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal and certify it as a
7 matches
Mail list logo
