DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report

On 4/9/23 01:19, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > I deputize as Referee, since this office is important for the assessor. I > investigate and nix GUILTY of weekly tardiness for 0 blots. > I publish the weekly report: I'm not sure this works. The communication standard for deputisation

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report

"I speak to the capitalists who continue to buy zombies, and to the most impoverished who don't have the money to." Best sentence in here. On 6/17/2018 6:07 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: I destroy 3 incense to expunge 3 blots from myself. My formal apology follows. Holding an office is potentially

DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report

I destroy 3 incense to expunge 3 blots from myself. My formal apology follows. Holding an office is potentially the largest responsibility any Agoran citizen can willingly take upon themselves. Abusing such a responsibility is not only an insult to the Spirit of the Game, but to fellow Agoran

DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report

'A player CAN, by announcement, destroy N incense in eir possession to expunge N of eir blots.' Since the blots didn't exist, I failed - I CAN destroy incense using this rule only if I have blots to expunge, and it's clear that I intended to use the expunging rule to destroy the incense, not the

DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report: Possibly Revision 1.

Looks good to me. Those match my records. -o > On Oct 24, 2017, at 4:14 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > If I am not the Referee, I deputise for that position and publish the > following. If I am, I accept o's CoE and publish the following. I > found the two green cards and two

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report: Possibly Revision 1.

Yeah, objection does nothing. The only way for o. to stop me would have been to publish eir own report. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I don't believe the rules respect objections to deputisation intents. > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017, 04:54 Ørjan Johansen,

DIS: Re: BUS: [Referee] Weekly Report: Possibly Revision 1.

I don't believe the rules respect objections to deputisation intents. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017, 04:54 Ørjan Johansen, wrote: > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > > > If I am not the Referee, I deputise for that position and publish the > > following. If I am, I accept o's CoE