Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-15 Thread Aris Merchant
Fair. However, submitting a proposal is a way of making it available to pend. You're basically putting it out into the world, and saying that you're ready to have it passed with your name on it. It serves no other intrinsic purpose, and indeed creates extra work for the Promotor. That's why, IMHO,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-15 Thread Alexis Hunt
If you aren't sure it's ready, you shouldn't pend it! On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 19:08 Aris Merchant, < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a general rule, if you aren't sure that something is read it should > be a proto, not a proposal. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:05 PM,

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-15 Thread Aris Merchant
As a general rule, if you aren't sure that something is read it should be a proto, not a proposal. -Aris On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I withdraw it; I had some revisions to do and it isn't ready. > > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 18:27 Aris Merchant, >

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-15 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: Amend Rule 105, bullet 2 to read "When a rule is repealed, it ceases to be a I'm not sure the HLR is good for pasting directly into email. Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
Oh that's just a typo. On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 21:55 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > After rereading it, I don't understand the need for both a "to" and a > "for". I think either would work on its own. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
After rereading it, I don't understand the need for both a "to" and a "for". I think either would work on its own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On Sat,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 19:02 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Amend Rule 105, bullet 3 by appending "Unless specified otherwise by the > > re-enacting instrument, a re-enacted rule has power equal to the power it > > had at the time of its repeal (or power 1, if

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 19:54 Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Set the power of all entities other than Rules, Regulations, and this > Proposal to 0. > > > > [This is a general cleanup that catches repealed rules and other > entities. I

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Set the power of all entities other than Rules, Regulations, and this > Proposal to 0. > > [This is a general cleanup that catches repealed rules and other entities. I > believe > that this actuall depowers old proposals, but that's probably a good

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Amend Rule 1023 by appending "The same applies, mutatis mutandis, to for >> determining whether two points in time are within N months of each other, >> for N greater than or

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Typo, see below. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal: > > Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3) > {{{ > Text in square brackets is not a

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

2017-10-14 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal: > > Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3) > {{{ > Text in square brackets is not a substantive part of this proposal and is > ignored when it takes effect. > > Amend Rule 105, bullet