On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement “The Warrigal and Zachary Watterson are the same 
> person.”
>
> Until this CFJ is resolved, I intend to track eir respective budgets 
> separately. This will cause em to receive more Shinies than e otherwise 
> should for April. Should I hold off on updating the Secretary’s actual 
> reports, to avoid ratifying this possibly-incorrect state? I don’t think ten 
> Shinies is a huge issue, but I’m open to feedback.
>
> -o
>

The easiest thing to do, in my opinion, would be to release the report
with a note marking that value as provisional. If it is later
determined that they are the same person, you can release an updated
report, which will then self ratify.

-Aris

Reply via email to