DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Sean Hunt
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble does not, I would encourage Wooble to vote, and I would encourage the Wielder

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: There are currently at least two or three endorsements of Wooble in the Tailor election. I would ask those endorsers to vote conditionally if Wooble

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, you're right, I was conufsing this with the Assessor election, which is regarding a vacant office and thus needs to be completed; whereas the resolution of this election is relatively immaterial. Accountor; Assessor isn't

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Sean Hunt
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, you're right, I was conufsing this with the Assessor election, which is regarding a vacant office and thus needs to be completed; whereas the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote: On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:46 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-13 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros

DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-08 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. I rubberstamp this decision. Anarchist(coppro, Quazie, Tiger), fails by one vote. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-08 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Yally wrote: These elections are failing quorum and will soon have to have their voting periods extended if enough votes are not cast: CotC(Arnold Bros (est. 1905), Murphy, Wooble), fails by one vote. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Attn: Elections Failing Quorum

2009-05-08 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: You can't rubberstamp elections. Meh? I thought that proposal had gone through. Maybe it's in the 6238-56 batch that I need to resolve.